scholarly journals Risk of COVID-19 hospital admission among children aged 5–17 years with asthma in Scotland: a national incident cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Shi ◽  
Jiafeng Pan ◽  
Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi ◽  
Colin McCowan ◽  
Steven Kerr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Incident Cohort

scholarly journals Treatment with a DPP-4 inhibitor at time of hospital admission for COVID-19 is not associated with improved clinical outcomes: data from the COVID-PREDICT cohort study in The Netherlands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick I. Meijer ◽  
Trynke Hoekstra ◽  
Niels C. Gritters van den Oever ◽  
Suat Simsek ◽  
Joop P. van den Bergh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Diabetes Severity ◽  
Outcome Mortality

Abstract Purpose Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-)4 could reduce coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity by reducing inflammation and enhancing tissue repair beyond glucose lowering. We aimed to assess this in a prospective cohort study. Methods We studied in 565 patients with type 2 diabetes in the CovidPredict Clinical Course Cohort whether use of a DPP-4 inhibitor prior to hospital admission due to COVID-19 was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Using crude analyses and propensity score matching (on age, sex and BMI), 28 patients using a DPP-4 inhibitor were identified and compared to non-users. Results No differences were found in the primary outcome mortality (matched-analysis = odds-ratio: 0,94 [95% confidence interval: 0,69 – 1,28], p-value: 0,689) or any of the secondary outcomes (ICU admission, invasive ventilation, thrombotic events or infectious complications). Additional analyses comparing users of DPP-4 inhibitors with subgroups of non-users (subgroup 1: users of metformin and sulphonylurea; subgroup 2: users of any insulin combination), allowing to correct for diabetes severity, did not yield different results. Conclusions We conclude that outpatient use of a DPP-4 inhibitor does not affect the clinical outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes who are hospitalized because of COVID-19 infection.

scholarly journals Predictive value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for disease deterioration and serious adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Yong Zeng ◽  
Shao-Dan Feng ◽  
Gong-Ping Chen ◽  
Jiang-Nan Wu
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

Abstract Background Early identification of patients who are at high risk of poor clinical outcomes is of great importance in saving the lives of patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the context of limited medical resources. Objective To evaluate the value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), calculated at hospital admission and in isolation, for the prediction of the subsequent presence of disease progression and serious clinical outcomes (e.g., shock, death). Methods We designed a prospective cohort study of 352 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 between January 9 and February 26, 2020, in Yichang City, Hubei Province. Patients with an NLR equal to or higher than the cutoff value derived from the receiver operating characteristic curve method were classified as the exposed group. The primary outcome was disease deterioration, defined as an increase of the clinical disease severity classification during hospitalization (e.g., moderate to severe/critical; severe to critical). The secondary outcomes were shock and death during the treatment. Results During the follow-up period, 51 (14.5%) patients’ conditions deteriorated, 15 patients (4.3%) had complicated septic shock, and 15 patients (4.3%) died. The NLR was higher in patients with deterioration than in those without deterioration (median: 5.33 vs. 2.14, P < 0.001), and higher in patients with serious clinical outcomes than in those without serious clinical outcomes (shock vs. no shock: 6.19 vs. 2.25, P < 0.001; death vs. survival: 7.19 vs. 2.25, P < 0.001). The NLR measured at hospital admission had high value in predicting subsequent disease deterioration, shock and death (all the areas under the curve > 0.80). The sensitivity of an NLR ≥ 2.6937 for predicting subsequent disease deterioration, shock and death was 82.0% (95% confidence interval, 69.0 to 91.0), 93.3% (68.0 to 100), and 92.9% (66.0 to 100), and the corresponding negative predictive values were 95.7% (93.0 to 99.2), 99.5% (98.6 to 100) and 99.5% (98.6 to 100), respectively. Conclusions The NLR measured at admission and in isolation can be used to effectively predict the subsequent presence of disease deterioration and serious clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

Cohort study of corticosteroid use and risk of hospital admission for diverticular disease

2014 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Hjern ◽  
M. W. Mahmood ◽  
M. Abraham-Nordling ◽  
A. Wolk ◽  
N. Håkansson
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Diverticular Disease

scholarly journals Association between home insulation and hospital admission rates: retrospective cohort study using linked data from a national intervention programme

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m4571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Fyfe ◽  
Lucy Telfar ◽  
Barnard ◽  
Philippa Howden-Chapman ◽  
Jeroen Douwes
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Rate Ratio ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Relative Rate ◽  
Intervention Programme ◽  
Admission Rates

Abstract Objectives To investigate whether retrofitting insulation into homes can reduce cold associated hospital admission rates among residents and to identify whether the effect varies between different groups within the population and by type of insulation. Design A quasi-experimental retrospective cohort study using linked datasets to evaluate a national intervention programme. Participants 994 317 residents of 204 405 houses who received an insulation subsidy through the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority Warm-up New Zealand: Heat Smart retrofit programme between July 2009 and June 2014. Main outcome measure A difference-in-difference approach was used to compare the change in hospital admissions of the study population post-insulation with the change in hospital admissions of the control population that did not receive the intervention over the same two timeframes. Relative rate ratios were used to compare the two groups. Results 234 873 hospital admissions occurred during the study period. Hospital admission rates after the intervention increased in the intervention and control groups for all population categories and conditions with the exception of acute hospital admissions among Pacific Peoples (rate ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 0.98), asthma (0.92, 0.86 to 0.99), cardiovascular disease (0.90, 0.88 to 0.93), and ischaemic heart disease for adults older than 65 years (0.79, 0.74 to 0.84). Post-intervention increases were, however, significantly lower (11%) in the intervention group compared with the control group (relative rate ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.90), representing 9.26 (95% confidence interval 9.05 to 9.47) fewer hospital admissions per 1000 in the intervention population. Effects were more pronounced for respiratory disease (0.85, 0.81 to 0.90), asthma in all age groups (0.80, 0.70 to 0.90), and ischaemic heart disease in those older than 65 years (0.75, 0.66 to 0.83). Conclusion This study showed that a national home insulation intervention was associated with reduced hospital admissions, supporting previous research, which found an improvement in self-reported health.

Abstract 57: Risk Factors For Severe Reductions In Blood Pressure After Treatment Of Severe Inpatient Hypertension

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lama Ghazi ◽  
Fan Li ◽  
Eric Chen ◽  
Michael Simonov ◽  
Yu Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Antihypertensive Treatment ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
P Value ◽  
Antihypertensive Medications ◽  
Black Race ◽  
Oral Medications

Background: Incident severe HTN during hospitalization is far more common than admission for HTN, however treatment guidelines are lacking. Severe inpatient HTN is poorly studied, therefore our goal is to characterize inpatients who develop severe HTN and assess BP response to antihypertensive treatment. Methods: This is a cohort study of adults admitted for reasons other than HTN and developed severe HTN within a single healthcare system. We defined severe inpatient HTN as the first documentation of BP elevation (>180 systolic or >110 diastolic) at least 1 hour after hospital admission. Treatment was defined as receiving antihypertensive medications within 6 hours of BP elevation. We studied the association between treatment and BP drop ≥30%. Results: Among 224,265 hospitalized adults, 23,147 developed severe HTN of which 40% were treated. Compared to inpatients who did not develop severe HTN, those who did were older, more commonly women and Black, and had more comorbidities. Of the treated and untreated patients, 45.5 and 46.4% had a MAP drop ≥30% (p-value= 0.2). Risk factors for severe MAP drop include older age, Black race, HTN, and diabetes. Additionally, treatment vs. no treatment and treatment with intravenous vs. oral medications were associated with greater odds of MAP drop ≥30% ( Table 1 ). Conclusion: While there was no difference in the proportion of treated and untreated patients with severe MAP reduction, after adjustment for factors independently associated with HTN we found that treatment was associated with severe BP drop. Further research is needed to phenotype inpatients with severe HTN to help establish treatment guidelines.

scholarly journals 65ANTICHOLINERGIC BURDEN IN PARKINSONISM: RELATIONSHIP WITH MORTALITY AND COGNITION. EVIDENCE FROM A PROSPECTIVE INCIDENT COHORT STUDY

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii24-iii24
Author(s):  
A D Wood ◽  
J Guillot ◽  
A D Macleod ◽  
C E Counsell ◽  
P K Myint
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Incident Cohort
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document