How we do it: ‘tonsil swabs please’ – an alternative use in open neck surgery

Author(s):  
E Mathew ◽  
D Nair ◽  
T Rourke ◽  
R Corbridge

Abstract Background Thyroid and parathyroid surgery often involves the use of heated instruments for dissection. Whilst these are beneficial, accidental thermal damage to the exposed skin edges can occur, resulting in an unsatisfactory cosmetic outcome. Tonsil swabs can be used in head and neck surgery intra-operatively to control bleeding. This paper describes an alternative use for them in protecting wound edges during the procedure. Method Damp tonsil swabs are sutured onto the wound edges after the initial skin incision. They remain present for the duration of the surgery and are removed at the time of skin closure. Results The tonsil swabs provide protection and help avoid accidental injury to the skin. No complications with this technique have been experienced. Conclusion This paper describes a simple, effective and practical technique for protecting the skin during neck procedures using resources readily available in a standard ENT operating theatre.

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. e125
Author(s):  
Donal McAuley ◽  
Raeed Sheikh ◽  
Jeremy McMahon ◽  
Stuart Hislop ◽  
Colin MacIver ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 119 (10) ◽  
pp. 813-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
A S Banerjee ◽  
F W Stafford

The Norfolk and Norwich retractor is a vital tool in head and neck surgery. It is of great aid in training junior surgeons and has become an integral part of the standard neck dissection instrument set in our unit. This retractor enables good exposure of the carotid sheath, its atraumatic blunt tip retracting the carotid sheath without damage. It makes a single skin incision for neck exposure possible, rather than a Y, T or wine glass incision, avoiding a three-point junction, especially in the post-irradiated neck. In thyroid surgery it reduces the need for manual retraction thereby relieving the assistant surgeon and enhancing the quality of the learning experience.


Author(s):  
Farhan Zubair ◽  
Jeremy McMahon ◽  
Eva Carson ◽  
James McCaul ◽  
W. Stuart Hislop ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. e61
Author(s):  
Jeremy McMahon ◽  
Donal MacAuley ◽  
Stuart Hislop ◽  
James McCaul ◽  
Colin MacIver ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-60
Author(s):  
Diva Shrestha

Background: Many studies have shown the benefits of diathermy over scalpel for making skin incisions in terms of post operative pain and post operative analgesics requirement. The objective of the study is to compare the pain following incision by scalpel and diathermy for skin in ENT surgery.Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized study and compared early post operative pain and analgesics requirement in patients undergoing ENT and Head and Neck surgery in Department of ENT at Kathmandu Medical College from September 2016 to August 2017. The statistical analysis was done using MS Excel and SPSS software.Results: Out of 65 participants, 31 were allocated in scalpel group and 30 were allocated in diathermy group. The mean VAS score was significantly greater in scalpel group as compared to diathermy group in post operative 12, 24 and 48 hours (P<0.05). The mean ketorolac requirement was significantly more in scalpel group than in diathermy group in post operative 24 hours. Conclusions: The early post operative pain is less in ENT-Head and Neck surgery patients with skin incision by diathermy as compared to the patients with skin incision by scalpel.


2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 412-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Rimmer ◽  
A Singh ◽  
P Banwell ◽  
PM Clarke ◽  
P Rhys Evans

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document