scholarly journals Solar Polar Field Reversals and Secular Variation of Cosmic Ray Intensity

1980 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
H. S. Ahluwalia

The profile of the well-known 11-year variation of the cosmic ray intensity appears to depend upon the emerging solar polar magnetic field regime in a very characteristic manner. During the solar activity cycle 19, the cosmic ray intensity takes about seven years to recover to its solar activity minimum level. But during the solar activity cycle 20, the recovery takes place in only about two years. It appears that these characteristic recovery modes are obtainable every other solar activity cycle. We are led to suggest two model configurations for the heliosphere. We believe that an “open” heliosphere model applies to solar activity cycles 18 and 20. A “closed” heliosphere model is obtainable during solar activity cycles 17 and 19. Our results are discussed.

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Krainev ◽  
G. A. Bazilevskaya ◽  
M. S. Kalinin ◽  
A. K. Svirzhevskaya ◽  
N. S. Svirzhevskii

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (S328) ◽  
pp. 130-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael R. S. de Mendonça ◽  
Carlos. R. Braga ◽  
Ezequiel Echer ◽  
Alisson Dal Lago ◽  
Marlos Rockenbach ◽  
...  

AbstractIt is well known that the cosmic ray intensity observed at the Earth's surface presents an 11 and 22-yr variations associated with the solar activity cycle. However, the observation and analysis of this modulation through ground muon detectors datahave been difficult due to the temperature effect. Furthermore, instrumental changes or temporary problems may difficult the analysis of these variations. In this work, we analyze the cosmic ray intensity observed since October 1970 until December 2012 by the Nagoya muon detector. We show the results obtained after analyzing all discontinuities and gaps present in this data and removing changes not related to natural phenomena. We also show the results found using the mass weighted method for eliminate the influence of atmospheric temperature changes on muon intensity observed at ground. As a preliminary result of our analyses, we show the solar cycle modulation in the muon intensity observed for more than 40 years.


1974 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
O. Filisetti ◽  
G. Lovera ◽  
C. Oldano ◽  
P. G. Tedde

Author(s):  
Valery L. Yanchukovsky ◽  
◽  
Anastasiya Yu. Belinskaya ◽  

The relationship of Earth's seismicity with solar activity is investigated using the results of continuous long–term observations of cosmic ray intensity, solar activity and the number of strong earthquakes. Modulation of the flux of cosmic rays is used as information on the level of solar activity, processes on the Sun and interplanetary medium. The distribution of the number of sunspots, the intensity of cosmic rays and the number of strong earthquakes in the solar cycle is presented.


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (29) ◽  
pp. 6669-6671
Author(s):  
G. A. BAZILEVSKAYA ◽  
V. S. MAKHMUTOV ◽  
Y. I. STOZHKOV ◽  
A. K. SVIRZHEVSKAYA ◽  
N. S. SVIRZHEVSKY

The homogeneous series of primary cosmic ray intensity with energy > 100 MeV is obtained in the long-term balloon measurements of charged particle fluxes performed by Lebedev Physical Institute. Supplementing these data with those of neutron monitors enables us to study the cosmic ray modulation on the wide energy base during more than four solar activity cycles. In the periods of solar activity maximum a transition from cosmic ray decrease to recovery occurs. Changes in fluxes of cosmic rays of lower energy lag behind the changes in fluxes of cosmic rays of higher energy producing an energy hysteresis. After a while cosmic ray fluxes of all energies start to recover. In the cycles 20 and 22 the periods of transition from decline to recovery were shorter than in the cycles 21 and 23. This may be indicative of more complicated passage from the cosmic ray drift in the A > 0 conditions to the drift in the A < 0 conditions than vice versa.


JETP Letters ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (12) ◽  
pp. 769-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. Krymsky ◽  
P. Yu. Gololobov ◽  
P. A. Krivoshapkin ◽  
S. K. Gerasimova ◽  
V. G. Grigoryev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document