Receptive-field properties of displaced starburst amacrine cells change following axotomy-induced degeneration of ganglion cells

1995 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph J. Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Membrane Properties ◽  
Optic Disk ◽  
Receptive Field Properties ◽  
Tungsten Microelectrode ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cell

AbstractStarburst amacrine cells in the rabbit retina were labeled following an intraocular injection of the fluorescent dye, 4, 6, diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). From each eye a strip of retina was removed, mounted on a platform beneath an epifluorescence microscope, and superfused with a physiological solution. The tip of a tungsten microelectrode (for extracellular recording) was visually positioned near the cell body of a DAPI-labeled starburst amacrine cell that was located in the ganglion cell layer. Light-evoked responses from the displaced starburst amacrine cells were studied in normal retinas and in retinas that had received a small electrolytic lesion near the optic disk 5–9 months beforehand. In normal retinas, a small spot of light centered over the receptive field of a displaced starburst amacrine cell in nearly all cases evoked a brief burst of spikes only at light onset. When stimulated with a large spot or an annulus of light, many cells gave a small burst of spikes at light offset. In lesioned retinas, the light responses of displaced starburst amacrine cells were recorded in areas of the retina where ganglion cells had degenerated. All cells responded with a large burst of spikes at the onset and offset of a small, centered spot of light. Large spots and annuli of light also evoked robust ON/OFF responses from these cells. The results from this study show that the receptive-field properties of displaced starburst amacrine cells change following axotomy-induced degeneration of ganglion cells. This finding indicates that changes in either synaptic transmission or the membrane properties of neurons occur in the retina following degeneration of ganglion cells.

scholarly journals Antagonistic center-surround mechanisms for direction selectivity in the retina

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea Ankri ◽  
Elishai Ezra-Tsur ◽  
Shir R. Maimon ◽  
Nathali Kaushansky ◽  
Michal Rivlin-Etzion
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Sensory Processing ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Repetitive Stimulation ◽  
Spatiotemporal Model ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells ◽  
Modeling Data

SummaryA key feature in sensory processing is center-surround receptive field antagonism. Retinal direction-selectivity (DS) relies on asymmetric inhibition from starburst amacrine cells (SAC) to direction selective ganglion cells (DSGC). SAC exhibit antagonistic center-surround, depolarizing to light increments and decrements in their center and surround, respectively, but the role of this property in DS remains elusive. We found that a repetitive stimulation exhausts SAC center and enhances its surround and used it to distinguish center-from surround-mediated responses. Center, but not surround stimulation, induced direction-selective responses in SAC, as predicted by an elementary spatiotemporal model. Nevertheless, both SAC center and surround elicited direction-selective responses in DSGCs, but to opposite directions. Physiological and morphology-based modeling data show that the opposed responses resulted from inverted DSGC’s excitatory-inhibitory temporal balance, indicating that SAC response time rules DS. Our findings reveal antagonistic center-surround mechanisms for DS, and demonstrate how context-dependent center-surround reorganization enables flexible computations.

scholarly journals Stratification of alpha ganglion cells and ON/OFF directionally selective ganglion cells in the rabbit retina

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
JIAN ZHANG ◽  
WEI LI ◽  
HIDEO HOSHI ◽  
STEPHEN L. MILLS ◽  
STEPHEN C. MASSEY
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Confocal Imaging ◽  
Rabbit Retina ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cholinergic Sensitivity

The correlation between cholinergic sensitivity and the level of stratification for ganglion cells was examined in the rabbit retina. As examples, we have used ON or OFF α ganglion cells and ON/OFF directionally selective (DS) ganglion cells. Nicotine, a cholinergic agonist, depolarized ON/OFF DS ganglion cells and greatly enhanced their firing rates but it had modest excitatory effects on ON or OFF α ganglion cells. As previously reported, we conclude that DS ganglion cells are the most sensitive to cholinergic drugs. Confocal imaging showed that ON/OFF DS ganglion cells ramify precisely at the level of the cholinergic amacrine cell dendrites, and co-fasciculate with the cholinergic matrix of starburst amacrine cells. However, neither ON or OFF α ganglion cells have more than a chance association with the cholinergic matrix. Z-axis reconstruction showed that OFF α ganglion cells stratify just below the cholinergic band in sublamina a while ON α ganglion cells stratify just below cholinergic b. The latter is at the same level as the terminals of calbindin bipolar cells. Thus, the calbindin bipolar cell appears to be a prime candidate to provide the bipolar cell input to ON α ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. We conclude that the precise level of stratification is correlated with the strength of cholinergic input. Alpha ganglion cells receive a weak cholinergic input and they are narrowly stratified just below the cholinergic bands.

scholarly journals Receptive field properties of bipolar cell axon terminals in direction-selective sublaminas of the mouse retina

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 1950-1962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minggang Chen ◽  
Seunghoon Lee ◽  
Silvia J. H. Park ◽  
Loren L. Looger ◽  
Z. Jimmy Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Patch Clamp Recording ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells

Retinal bipolar cells (BCs) transmit visual signals in parallel channels from the outer to the inner retina, where they provide glutamatergic inputs to specific networks of amacrine and ganglion cells. Intricate network computation at BC axon terminals has been proposed as a mechanism for complex network computation, such as direction selectivity, but direct knowledge of the receptive field property and the synaptic connectivity of the axon terminals of various BC types is required in order to understand the role of axonal computation by BCs. The present study tested the essential assumptions of the presynaptic model of direction selectivity at axon terminals of three functionally distinct BC types that ramify in the direction-selective strata of the mouse retina. Results from two-photon Ca2+ imaging, optogenetic stimulation, and dual patch-clamp recording demonstrated that 1) CB5 cells do not receive fast GABAergic synaptic feedback from starburst amacrine cells (SACs); 2) light-evoked and spontaneous Ca2+ responses are well coordinated among various local regions of CB5 axon terminals; 3) CB5 axon terminals are not directionally selective; 4) CB5 cells consist of two novel functional subtypes with distinct receptive field structures; 5) CB7 cells provide direct excitatory synaptic inputs to, but receive no direct GABAergic synaptic feedback from, SACs; and 6) CB7 axon terminals are not directionally selective, either. These findings help to simplify models of direction selectivity by ruling out complex computation at BC terminals. They also show that CB5 comprises two functional subclasses of BCs.

scholarly journals Retinal direction selectivity in the absence of asymmetric starburst amacrine cell responses

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Hanson ◽  
Santhosh Sethuramanujam ◽  
Geoff deRosenroll ◽  
Varsha Jain ◽  
Gautam B Awatramani
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Receptor Knockout Mouse ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells ◽  
Gabaergic Synapses ◽  
Novel Strategy ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cell ◽  
Differential Connectivity

In the mammalian retina, direction-selectivity is thought to originate in the dendrites of GABAergic/cholinergic starburst amacrine cells, where it is first observed. However, here we demonstrate that direction selectivity in downstream ganglion cells remains remarkably unaffected when starburst dendrites are rendered non-directional, using a novel strategy combining a conditional GABAA α2 receptor knockout mouse with optogenetics. We show that temporal asymmetries between excitation/inhibition, arising from the differential connectivity patterns of starburst cholinergic and GABAergic synapses to ganglion cells, form the basis for a parallel mechanism generating direction selectivity. We further demonstrate that these distinct mechanisms work in a coordinated way to refine direction selectivity as the stimulus crosses the ganglion cell’s receptive field. Thus, precise spatiotemporal patterns of inhibition and excitation that determine directional responses in ganglion cells are shaped by two ‘core’ mechanisms, both arising from distinct specializations of the starburst network.

scholarly journals Retinal direction selectivity in the absence of asymmetric starburst amacrine cell responses

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Hanson ◽  
Santhosh Sethuramanujam ◽  
Geoff deRosenroll ◽  
Gautam B. Awatramani
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Receptor Knockout Mouse ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells ◽  
Gabaergic Synapses ◽  
Novel Strategy ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cell ◽  
Differential Connectivity

SummaryIn the mammalian retina, asymmetric inhibitory signals arising from the direction-selective dendrites of GABAergic/cholinergic starburst amacrine cells are thought to be crucial for originating direction selectivity. Contrary to this notion, however, we found that direction selectivity in downstream ganglion cells remains remarkably unaffected when starburst output is rendered non-directional (using a novel strategy combining a conditional GABAA α2 receptor knockout mouse with optogenetics). We show that temporal asymmetries between excitation/inhibition, arising from the differential connectivity patterns of starburst cholinergic and GABAergic synapses to ganglion cells, form the basis for a parallel mechanism generating direction selectivity. We further demonstrate that these distinct mechanisms work in a coordinated way to refine direction selectivity as the stimulus crosses the ganglion cell’s receptive field. Thus, precise spatiotemporal patterns of inhibition and excitation that shape directional responses in ganglion cells are shaped by two ‘core’ mechanisms, both arising from distinct specializations of the starburst network.

scholarly journals A retinal circuit for the suppressed-by-contrast receptive field of a polyaxonal amacrine cell

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (17) ◽  
pp. 9577-9583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Jia ◽  
Seunghoon Lee ◽  
Yehong Zhuo ◽  
Z. Jimmy Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Small Field

Amacrine cells are a diverse population of interneurons in the retina that play a critical role in extracting complex features of the visual world and shaping the receptive fields of retinal output neurons (ganglion cells). While much of the computational power of amacrine cells is believed to arise from the immense mutual interactions among amacrine cells themselves, the intricate circuitry and functions of amacrine–amacrine interactions are poorly understood in general. Here we report a specific interamacrine pathway from a small-field, glutamate–glycine dual-transmitter amacrine cell (vGluT3) to a wide-field polyaxonal amacrine cell (PAS4/5). Distal tips of vGluT3 cell dendrites made selective glycinergic (but not glutamatergic) synapses onto PAS4/5 dendrites to provide a center-inhibitory, surround-disinhibitory drive that helps PAS4/5 cells build a suppressed-by-contrast (sbc) receptive field, which is a unique and fundamental trigger feature previously found only in a small population of ganglion cells. The finding of this trigger feature in a circuit upstream to ganglion cells suggests that the sbc form of visual computation occurs more widely in the retina than previously believed and shapes visual processing in multiple downstream circuits in multiple ways. We also identified two different subpopulations of PAS4/5 cells based on their differential connectivity with vGluT3 cells and their distinct receptive-field and luminance-encoding characteristics. Moreover, our results revealed a form of crosstalk between small-field and large-field amacrine cell circuits, which provides a mechanism for feature-specific local (<150 µm) control of global (>1 mm) retinal activity.

scholarly journals Intrinsic bursting of AII amacrine cells underlies oscillations in the rd1 mouse retina

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1491-1504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Choi ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Mark S. Cembrowski ◽  
Carl F. Sabottke ◽  
Alexander L. Markowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Wild Type Mouse ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Membrane Properties ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Intrinsic Membrane Properties ◽  
Rd1 Mouse ◽  
Aii Amacrine

In many forms of retinal degeneration, photoreceptors die but inner retinal circuits remain intact. In the rd1 mouse, an established model for blinding retinal diseases, spontaneous activity in the coupled network of AII amacrine and ON cone bipolar cells leads to rhythmic bursting of ganglion cells. Since such activity could impair retinal and/or cortical responses to restored photoreceptor function, understanding its nature is important for developing treatments of retinal pathologies. Here we analyzed a compartmental model of the wild-type mouse AII amacrine cell to predict that the cell's intrinsic membrane properties, specifically, interacting fast Na and slow, M-type K conductances, would allow its membrane potential to oscillate when light-evoked excitatory synaptic inputs were withdrawn following photoreceptor degeneration. We tested and confirmed this hypothesis experimentally by recording from AIIs in a slice preparation of rd1 retina. Additionally, recordings from ganglion cells in a whole mount preparation of rd1 retina demonstrated that activity in AIIs was propagated unchanged to elicit bursts of action potentials in ganglion cells. We conclude that oscillations are not an emergent property of a degenerated retinal network. Rather, they arise largely from the intrinsic properties of a single retinal interneuron, the AII amacrine cell.

scholarly journals GABA release selectively regulates synapse development at distinct inputs on direction-selective retinal ganglion cells

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (51) ◽  
pp. E12083-E12090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Bleckert ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Maxwell H. Turner ◽  
David Koren ◽  
David M. Berson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Selective Reduction ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Gaba Release ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Gabaergic Transmission ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells ◽  
Receptor Clusters

Synaptic inhibition controls a neuron’s output via functionally distinct inputs at two subcellular compartments, the cell body and the dendrites. It is unclear whether the assembly of these distinct inhibitory inputs can be regulated independently by neurotransmission. In the mammalian retina, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release from starburst amacrine cells (SACs) onto the dendrites of on–off direction-selective ganglion cells (ooDSGCs) is essential for directionally selective responses. We found that ooDSGCs also receive GABAergic input on their somata from other amacrine cells (ACs), including ACs containing the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). When net GABAergic transmission is reduced, somatic, but not dendritic, GABAA receptor clusters on the ooDSGC increased in number and size. Correlative fluorescence imaging and serial electron microscopy revealed that these enlarged somatic receptor clusters are localized to synapses. By contrast, selectively blocking vesicular GABA release from either SACs or VIP ACs did not alter dendritic or somatic receptor distributions on the ooDSGCs, showing that neither SAC nor VIP AC GABA release alone is required for the development of inhibitory synapses in ooDSGCs. Furthermore, a reduction in net GABAergic transmission, but not a selective reduction from SACs, increased excitatory drive onto ooDSGCs. This increased excitation may drive a homeostatic increase in ooDSGC somatic GABAA receptors. Differential regulation of GABAA receptors on the ooDSGC’s soma and dendrites could facilitate homeostatic control of the ooDSGC’s output while enabling the assembly of the GABAergic connectivity underlying direction selectivity to be indifferent to altered transmission.

Amacrine-to-amacrine cell inhibition: Spatiotemporal properties of GABA and glycine pathways

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
XIN CHEN ◽  
HAIN ANN HSUEH ◽  
FRANK S. WERBLIN
Keyword(s):  
Amacrine Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Peak Level ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Gabaergic Inhibition ◽  
Onset Latency ◽  
Temporal Properties ◽  
Glycinergic Inhibition ◽  
Cell Inhibition

AbstractWe measured the spatial and temporal properties of GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition to amacrine cells in the whole-mount rabbit retina. The amacrine cells were parsed into two morphological classes: narrow-field cells with processes spreading less than 200 μm and wide-field cells with processes extending more than 300 μm. The inhibition was also parsed into two types: sustained glycine and transient GABA. Narrow-field amacrine cells receive 1) very transient GABAergic inhibition with a fast onset latency of 140 ± 16 ms decaying to 30% of the peak level within 208 ± 27 ms elicited broadly over a lateral distance of up to 1500 μm and 2) sustained glycinergic inhibition with a medium onset latency of 286 ± 23 ms that was elicited over a spatial area often broader than the processes of the narrow-field amacrine cells. Wide-field amacrine cells received sustained glycinergic inhibition but no broad transient GABAergic inhibition. Surprisingly, neither of these amacrine cell classes received sustained local GABAergic inhibition, commonly found in an earlier study of ganglion cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document