scholarly journals Mules in Southern Agriculture: Revisited

2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin A. Garrett

AbstractThis article provides additional empirical evidence concerning the choice of the mule as the dominant draft animal in southern agricultural production in the latter 19th and early 20th century. While the mule was uniquely suited to the crops and climate of the region, two divergent arguments have been presented as to why the mule was the dominant draft animal in southern agricultural production. This research reevaluates these arguments and provides evidence that it was, in fact, the characteristics of this hybrid that made it the preferred draft animal for the South.

Author(s):  
Pinar Ceylan

Concentrating on the Western Anatolian district of Manisa and employing tax surveys dating 1575, this study points to the regional variation in property rights institutions, which resulted in different inequality regimes across space. Empirical evidence suggests the existence of two agricultural production systems characterized by different property and surplus relations, in the southern and northern parts of the district in the late sixteenth century. Accordingly, inequality structures in these areas reflected region-specific patterns of property rights distribution within and across direct producers and landlords’ classes.


1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin A. Garrett

Given the importance of draft animals—horses, mules, and oxen—in the development of the American economy, it is surprising how little attention has been paid to their contribution. Moreover, this is not, in most cases, attributable to a lack of empirical evidence; the vast majority of the work on draft animals to date is found in oral history and folklore literature. While this literature delighted in presenting the sentiments and personal stories of a few rather than attempting to provide a broader perspective, it does provide valuable historical information. Not surprisingly, however, the sentiments of a few, perhaps sometimes embellished, occasionally led to conclusions that are not consistent with predictions. For example, recent evidence supports the superiority of mules over horses and oxen in southern agricultural production, which refutes the notion that southerners used the mule for cultural reasons (Garrett 1990; Kauffman 1993). As Rockoff (1991: 243) states, “One of the main functions of the economic historian, from the point of view of economics, is to examine the foundation of these myths.”


1984 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Jiardaker ◽  
E. M. Fleming ◽  
G. T. Harris

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 957-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdoulkarim Esmaeili ◽  
Solmaz Vazirzadeh

1961 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 133-143
Author(s):  
Ralph W. Phillips ◽  
Leslie T. C. Kuo

China is a vast country, varying widely in its land, its climate, its agriculture and its people. Extending across some 35 degrees of latitude, and with extreme ranges in elevation and in precipitation, it has many types of agricultural production. At one extreme are the intensively cultivated rice fields of the south. On some of these, two crops of rice are grown per year; some are drained after the rice harvest for the production of a crop of winter vegetables. At the other extreme are the grassland areas of the northern Manchurian provinces, Inner Mongolia, Kansu, Chinghai, west Szechwan, Tibet and Sinkiang, with their herds of sheep, goats, cattle, yaks and camels. In between is the so-called wheat area, north of the Chingling Mountains and extending to the edge of the grasslands.


Author(s):  
Abiodun Olusola Omotayo ◽  
Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju ◽  
Abeeb Babatunde Omotoso ◽  
Adebayo Isaiah Ogunniyi ◽  
Olutosin Ademola Otekunrin ◽  
...  

1973 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 697-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Newell

The literature on French economic history generally dates the onset of the agricultural revolution in France from the midnineteenth century. However, the available empirical evidence on national agricultural trends, brought together in 1961 by Toutain, shows that the rapid, sustained growth in both total and per capita agricultural production comes earlier, during the period from 1815–24 to 1865–74. This article explores the sources of this rapid national growth by assembling and analyzing previously unutilized regional data on production and hectares of major field crops. The southern diffusion of mixed farming is identified as the change in the productive process which may account for the French agricultural revolution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document