Studies of Carbamazepine Extended-Release Capsules in Bipolar Disorder

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (S1) ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Richard H. Weisler
Keyword(s):  
Extended Release ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Mixed States ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Young Mania ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Bipolar Patients

This discussion reviews data from two 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled pivotal trials of carbamazepine extended release capsules (CBZ ERC; SPD417.301 and SPD417.304); pooled results from these trials; data from a 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in lithium non-responders or non-tolerators (SPD417.302); and additional supportive data from a 6-month, open-label, extension trial (SPD417.303). In addition, information on a retrospective chart review of 600 adolescent and adult bipolar patients on CBZ ERC is presented.In the first large double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing CBZ ERC in acute mania, manic and mixed bipolar patients from multiple centers were hospitalized and all medications were discontinued. After reaching a stable baseline 2–5 days later, the patients were randomized to CBZ ERC (n=101; 59% with mixed states) or placebo (n=103; 47% with mixed states) for 3 weeks. An aggressive initial titration schedule was implemented, beginning with 200 mg BID and increased by 200 mg/day until good clinical response was achieved or the patient could not tolerate the dosage. Many patients were taking 1,200–1,600 mg/day by the end of week 1. Efficacy was assessed using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). The Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) were also followed.

Studies of Carbamazepine Extended-Release Capsules in Bipolar Disorder

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Richard H. Weisler
Keyword(s):  
Extended Release ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Mixed States ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Young Mania ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Bipolar Patients

This discussion reviews data from two 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled pivotal trials of carbamazepine extended release capsules (CBZ ERC; SPD417.301 and SPD417.304); pooled results from these trials; data from a 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in lithium non-responders or non-tolerators (SPD417.302); and additional supportive data from a 6-month, open-label, extension trial (SPD417.303). In addition, information on a retrospective chart review of 600 adolescent and adult bipolar patients on CBZ ERC is presented.In the first large double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing CBZ ERC in acute mania, manic and mixed bipolar patients from multiple centers were hospitalized and all medications were discontinued. After reaching a stable baseline 2–5 days later, the patients were randomized to CBZ ERC (n=101; 59% with mixed states) or placebo (n=103; 47% with mixed states) for 3 weeks. An aggressive initial titration schedule was implemented, beginning with 200 mg BID and increased by 200 mg/day until good clinical response was achieved or the patient could not tolerate the dosage. Many patients were taking 1,200–1,600 mg/day by the end of week 1. Efficacy was assessed using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). The Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) were also followed.

A Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Divalproex and Olanzapine in Bipolar I Disorder, Mixed Episode

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
J. Houston ◽  
M. Tohen ◽  
E. Degenhardt ◽  
H. Jamal ◽  
L. Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Blood Levels ◽  
Young Mania ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Mixed Episode ◽  
Bipolar I Disorder ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Concomitant Medications ◽  
Unique Study

Aims:This unique study of treatment of the mixed state of bipolar I disorder using simultaneous depression and mania response criteria compared divalproex monotherapy versus olanzapine augmentation in a 6-week, randomized, double-blind trial.Methods:Patients (age 18-60 years) with 14-28 days of divalproex monotherapy (blood levels of 75-125 μg/mL) were randomized to augmentation with olanzapine 5-20 mg/day or placebo. Data collected included: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP), hospitalizations, concomitant medications, and adverse events (AEs). Primary co-objectives were comparisons of baseline to endpoint changes in HDRS and YMRS. Secondary objectives included comparisons of times to onset (25% reduction) and response (50% reduction) in both HDRS and YMRS, change in CGI-BP, hospitalizations, and safety.Results:Patients were 59% female, 51% Caucasian, 33% African American, and 14% Hispanic with mean standard deviation (SD) HDRS and YMRS scores of 22.2 (4.5) and 20.9 (4.4). Mean standard error (SE) score changes for the olanzapine (n=100) or placebo (n=101) arms, respectively, were: HDRS, -9.37 (.55) and -7.69 (.54), p=.022; YMRS, -10.15 (.44) and -7.68 (.44), p< .001; and CGI-BP, -1.34 (.11) and -1.06 (.11), p=.056. Times-to-onset (median 7 vs 14 days) and response (median 25 vs 49 days) were significantly shorter for olanzapine augmentation. One olanzapine patient required hospitalization (p=1.0). Treatment-emergent AEs were consistent with previously-published rates.Conclusion:Six-week olanzapine treatment augmentation was associated with greater and earlier reduction of manic and depressive symptoms in mixed episode patients on divalproex treatment.

A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Low Dose Infliximab in Ankylosing Spondylitis

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1203-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT D. INMAN ◽  
WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Spinal Mobility ◽  
Extension Phase ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

Objective.The tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor infliximab (IFX) has been proven effective for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The primary objective of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to assess the safety and efficacy of low-dose (3 mg/kg q8w) IFX therapy in AS.Methods.In the 12-week double-blind phase of the study, patients (N = 76) were randomized to infusions of placebo or IFX (3 mg/kg) at Weeks 0, 2, and 6. The primary endpoint was 20% improvement in ASsessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis criteria (ASAS20) at 12 weeks. In the open-label extension phase, all patients received scheduled IFX infusions (q 8 weeks) up to 46 weeks. Patients who did not meet target response criteria (i.e., BASDAI score did not improve by at least 50% and was > 3) at Weeks 22 or 38 had a dose increase to IFX 5 mg/kg.Results.At 12 weeks, 53.8% of IFX-treated patients achieved ASAS20, compared with 30.6% of placebo-treated patients (p = 0.042). IFX-treated patients showed significant improvement in measures of disease activity, spinal mobility, and quality of life over the course of the study. During the extension phase, 68% of patients in the IFX group did not meet the clinical target and had an increase in the dose of IFX to 5 mg/kg by 38 weeks. In general, IFX was safe and well tolerated. Ten patients withdrew from the study for various reasons, with only 2 (2.6%) attributed to adverse events.Conclusion.IFX 3 mg/kg was effective in reducing the signs and symptoms of active AS, and was generally safe and well tolerated. Dose escalation to 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks was warranted in most patients to achieve the target clinical response of the study.

scholarly journals Celecoxib added to mood stabilizer for treating acute mania in bipolar disorder: A randomized, double -blind, placebo-controlled trial in IRAN

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Faridhosseini ◽  
Ali Talaei ◽  
Najmeh Shahini ◽  
Mahbobeh Eslamzadeh ◽  
Samira Ahrari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Acute Mania ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Young Mania ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Valproate Sodium ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Inflammatory processes in the brain contribute to the aetiopathogenesis of acute mania. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, such as Celecoxib, reduce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The purpose of the present investigation was to assess the efficacy of Celecoxib in the treatment of acute mania.Methods: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at the Specialty in-patient Clinic of Ibn-e-Sina Hospital [Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran] from March 2017 to August 2017. The study involved 58 patients who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) criteria for acute mania screening to participate in the trial were used for the study. Twenty-three patients were assigned to a study group and were given Valproate Sodium 200 mg /BD plus Celecoxib 400 mg/day (200 mg BID). The control group included 22 patients who were given Valproate Sodium 200 mg /BD plus placebo. Patients were assessed by Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at baseline 0, after 9, 18, and 28 days after the medication started. Data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 11.5., two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, Fisher’s exact test, and T-Test. P≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.Results: A total of 58 patients were screened and 45 were randomized. Most of participations in celecoxib group were male (55%) and in placebo group were female (75%). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding number of episode. sex, marital status, past medical history, past psychiatry history and family history P value ≥0.05. A significant difference was observed in the change of scores on Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at week 4 as compared to the baseline in patient groups P: 0.04.Conclusion: This study suggested that Celecoxib can be an effective adjuvant agent in managing patients with acute mania and anti-inflammatory therapies should further be investigated in these patients.Trial registration: Iran clinical trial register: IRCT20200306046708N1

Long-term cariprazine treatment for the prevention of relapse in patients with schizophrenia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
Suresh Durgam ◽  
Willie Earley ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Dayong Li ◽  
Kaifeng Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Relapse Prevention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Time To Relapse

Cariprazine, a dopamine D3/D2 receptor partial agonist with preference for D3 receptors, has demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials in schizophrenia. This multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cariprazine for relapse prevention in adults with schizophrenia; total study duration was up to 97 weeks. Schizophrenia symptoms were treated/stabilized with cariprazine 3—9 mg/d during 20-week open-label treatment consisting of an 8-week, flexible-dose run-in phase and a 12-week fixed-dose stabilization phase. Stable patients who completed open-label treatment could be randomized to continued cariprazine (3, 6, or 9 mg/d) or placebo for double-blind treatment (up to 72 weeks). The primary efficacy parameter was time to relapse (worsening of symptom scores, psychiatric hospitalization, aggressive/violent behavior, or suicidal risk); clinical measures were implemented to ensure safety in case of impending relapse. A total of 264/765 patients completed open-label treatment; 200 eligible patients were randomized to double-blind placebo (n = 99) or cariprazine (n = 101). Time to relapse was significantly longer in cariprazine — versus placebo-treated patients (P = .0010, log-rank test). Relapse occurred in 24.8% of cariprazine- and 47.5% of placebo-treated patients (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.45 [0.28, 0.73]). Akathisia (19.2%), insomnia (14.4%), and headache (12.0%) were reported in ≥ 10% of patients during open-label treatment; there were no cariprazine adverse events ≥ 10% during double-blind treatment. Long-term cariprazine treatment was significantly more effective than placebo for relapse prevention in patients with schizophrenia. The long-term safety profile in this study was consistent with the safety profile observed in previous cariprazine clinical trials. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01412060. Key words: schizophrenia; cariprazine; long-term treatment; relapse prevention; randomized controlled trial; oral antipsychotics

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document