Series in Microscopy in Materials Science: Electron Microscopy in Heterogeneous Catalysis. P.L. Gai and E.D. Boyes. Series Editors: B. Cantor, M.J. Goringe, and J.A Eades. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, England; 2003, 233 pages (Hardback). ISBN 0-7503-0809-5

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-368
Author(s):  
Hiroyasu Saka

This book deals with in situ dynamic observation and analysis of heterogeneous catalysis using environmental cells (EC) in transmission (TEM) and scanning electron microscopes (SEM). In general, it is based on outstanding and unique works carried out by the authors themselves over the past three decades, who pioneered this key enabling area of materials science.

Author(s):  
M.A. O’Keefe ◽  
J. Taylor ◽  
D. Owen ◽  
B. Crowley ◽  
K.H. Westmacott ◽  
...  

Remote on-line electron microscopy is rapidly becoming more available as improvements continue to be developed in the software and hardware of interfaces and networks. Scanning electron microscopes have been driven remotely across both wide and local area networks. Initial implementations with transmission electron microscopes have targeted unique facilities like an advanced analytical electron microscope, a biological 3-D IVEM and a HVEM capable of in situ materials science applications. As implementations of on-line transmission electron microscopy become more widespread, it is essential that suitable standards be developed and followed. Two such standards have been proposed for a high-level protocol language for on-line access, and we have proposed a rational graphical user interface. The user interface we present here is based on experience gained with a full-function materials science application providing users of the National Center for Electron Microscopy with remote on-line access to a 1.5MeV Kratos EM-1500 in situ high-voltage transmission electron microscope via existing wide area networks. We have developed and implemented, and are continuing to refine, a set of tools, protocols, and interfaces to run the Kratos EM-1500 on-line for collaborative research. Computer tools for capturing and manipulating real-time video signals are integrated into a standardized user interface that may be used for remote access to any transmission electron microscope equipped with a suitable control computer.


1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1193-1194
Author(s):  
Brendan J. Griffin

Most scanning electron microscopy is performed at low magnification; applications utilising the large depth of field nature of the SEM image rather than the high resolution aspect. Some environmental SEMs have a particular limitation in that the field of view is restricted by a pressure limiting aperture (PLA) at the beam entry point of the specimen chamber. With the original ElectroScan design, the E-3 model ESEM utilised a 500 urn aperture which gave a very limited field of view (∼550um diameter at a 10mm working distance [WD]). An increase of aperture size to ∼lmm provided an improved but still unsatisfactory field of view. The simplest option to increase the field of view in an ESEM was noted to be a movement of the pressure and field, limiting aperture back towards the scan coils1. This approach increased the field of view to ∼2mm, at a 10mm WD. A commercial low magnification device extended this concept and indicated the attainment of conventional fields of view.


2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 776-777
Author(s):  
John F. Mansfield

The environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM™) and variable pressure electron microscope (VPSEM) have become accepted tools in the contemporary electron microscopy facility. Their flexibility and their ability to image almost any sample with little, and often no, specimen preparation has proved so attractive that each manufacturer of scanning electron microscopes now markets a low vacuum model.The University of Michigan Electron Microbeam Analysis Laboratory (EMAL) operates two variable pressure instruments, an ElectroScan E3 ESEM and a Hitachi S3200N VPSEM. The E3 ESEM was acquired in the early 1990s with funding from the Amoco Foundation and it has been used to examine an extremely wide variety of different materials. Since EMAL serves the entire university community, and offers support to neighboring institutions and local industry, the types of materials examined span a wide range. There are users from Materials Science & Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Geology, Biology, Biophysics, Pharmacy and Pharmacology.


Sensors ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 2552-2565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hu Huang ◽  
Hongwei Zhao ◽  
Boda Wu ◽  
Shunguang Wan ◽  
Chengli Shi

Author(s):  
L. C. Sawyer

Recent advances in Analytical Electxon Microscopy (AEM) have changed the methods by which microicopists study polymer and fiber morphology. As polymeric materialis play a major role in our way of living - clothing, shelter, fuel, chemicals - the interest has spread from a small group of theoretical physicists to the larger group of applications scientists. Until forty years ago, optical microscopy (OM) provided the only microicopical means of observing the morphology of materials. Then transmission electron microscopes (TEM) brought a new depth and resolution of fine structures not previously known. The methodology of preparing materials for TEM, ultramicrotomy and replication, are revealing but tedious and replete with artifacts. Bridging the gap between OM and TEM the scanning electron microscopes (SEM), in use over the past fifteen years, have provided easily available and interpretable surface images of fibers, fabrics, membranes, films and composites. Finally, the limited resolution of the SEM has been improved by the use of modern composite instruments known as analytical electron microscopes (AEM).


Author(s):  
J. Cowan ◽  
T. Taylor

Abstract Evaluation of Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEMs) was initiated for the purpose of purchasing a SEM that would improve the productivity of scanning electron microscopy during the cycle of analysis and deprocessing of semiconductor devices in a failure analysis lab. In addition to the need for high image resolution at low electron acceleration voltages, an accurate motorized stage is a major evaluation factor. It is necessary for the analyst to drive directly to a known location such as a memory cell with a high assurance that the site of interest was found. There are two main areas of focus in this paper. First, our SEM evaluation methodology will be presented along with the results of our evaluation. Second, the technology associated with motorized stages will be discussed in light of our requirements for a motorized, highly accurate stage. As a byproduct of this evaluation, this paper is presented so as to push the SEM industry to offer a SEM with an accurate stage for subhalfmicron products at reasonable cost.


Author(s):  
J. E. Ubelaker ◽  
R. D. Specian ◽  
V. F. Allison

Among the parasitic flatworms, only members of the trematoda have exploited nearly every conceivable niche. Since physiological demands in each habitat present special problems in eluding the host response as well as obtaining nourishment the surface epithelia of such organisms warrant special attention. To gain an appreciation of tegumental diversity in the trematoda, representative trematodes from numerous habitats in their respective hosts were examined by scanning electron microscopySpecimens were collected from natural infections, fixed in paraformaldehyde and dehydrated in alcohol. Ethanol was exchanged with amyl acetate prior to CO2 drying in a Denton DCP-1 critical point dryer. The dried specimens were mounted on metal holders, outgassed and rotary coated with gold-palladium. These were then examined with the ISI Mini-SEM and AMR 1000 scanning electron microscopes.


MRS Bulletin ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 17-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances M. Ross

This issue of the MRS Bulletin aims to highlight the innovative and exciting materials science research now being done using in situ electron microscopy. Techniques which combine real-time image acquisition with high spatial resolution have contributed to our understanding of a remarkably diverse range of physical phenomena. The articles in this issue present recent advances in materials science which have been made using the techniques of transmission electron microscopy (TEM), including holography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), low-energy electron microscopy (LEEM), and high-voltage electron microscopy (HVEM).The idea of carrying out dynamic experiments involving real-time observation of microscopic phenomena has always had an attraction for materials scientists. Ever since the first static images were obtained in the electron microscope, materials scientists have been interested in observing processes in real time: we feel that we obtain a true understanding of a microscopic phenomenon if we can actually watch it taking place. The idea behind “materials science in the electron microscope” is therefore to use the electron microscope—with its unique ability to image subtle changes in a material at or near the atomic level—as a laboratory in which a remarkable variety of experiments can be carried out. In this issue you will read about dynamic experiments in areas such as phase transformations, thin-film growth, and electromigration, which make use of innovative designs for the specimen, the specimen holder, or the microscope itself. These articles speak for themselves in demonstrating the power of real-time analysis in the quantitative exploration of reaction mechanisms.The first transmission electron microscopes operated at low accelerating voltages, up to about 100 kV. This placed a severe limitation on the thickness of foils that could be examined: Heavy elements, for example, had to be made into foils thinner than 0.1 μm. It was felt that any phenomenon whose “mean free path” was comparable to the foil thickness would be significantly affected by the foil surfaces, and therefore would be unsuitable for study in situ. However, technology quickly generated ever higher accelerating voltages, culminating in the giant 3 MeV electron microscopes. At these voltages, electrons can penetrate materials as thick as 6–9 μm for light elements such as Si and Al, and 1 μm for very heavy ones such as Au and U.


2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 524-525
Author(s):  
Brian Cunningham

In the last two decades, microscopy, in particular transmission electron microscopy, has moved from the research environment into industry. As such, the user requirements of the microscopes have changed. Previously, users required the highest performance in all aspects of microscopy e.g. imaging, analytical capabilities, with little regard to other factors. Today, additional requirements are being placed on areas such as ease of use, reliability, high throughput, expanded sample requirements, and networking capabilities. However, the “high performance” aspects of the instrumentation are still a high priority to the end user. These user requirements cause microscope manufacturers a dilemma in many instances. It is not always possible to provide the “new” requirements while still maintaining the high performance of the instruments, at a “reasonable” cost. An example is the large sample requirements in scanning electron microscopes. Large stages are inherently more prone to vibration than smaller stages, and therefore adversely affect resolution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document