scholarly journals Single Atom Detection by XEDS in the Aberration Corrected AEM: Is it Feasible?,

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (S2) ◽  
pp. 458-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
NJ Zaluzec

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2009 in Richmond, Virginia, USA, July 26 – July 30, 2009

1978 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gelbwachs ◽  
C. Klein ◽  
J. Wessel
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
A R Lupini ◽  
M Varela ◽  
A Y Borisevich ◽  
Y Peng ◽  
S J Pennycook

1991 ◽  
Vol 2 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 257-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ondrej L. Krivanek ◽  
Claudie Mory ◽  
Marcel Tence ◽  
Christian Colliex

2012 ◽  
Vol 100 (14) ◽  
pp. 141906 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Lefebvre ◽  
V. Kopp ◽  
C. Pareige
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 965-966
Author(s):  
M. Watanabe ◽  
D. W. Ackland ◽  
D. B. Williams

One of the ultimate objectives for energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) in the analytical electron microscope (AEM) is single-atom detection in thin specimens, as well as quantitative microanalysis with high accuracy approaching ±1% relative. In order to realize the single-atom analysis, the design of the AEM has to be optimized with respect to improvements in spatial resolution and detectability limits. The detectability limit, as defined by the minimum mass fraction (MMF), is given by:where P is the peak intensity of interest, (P/B) is the peak-to-background ratio for that peak, and r is the acquisition time. To improve the sensitivity for analysis, any or all of the variables P, (P/B), and τ should be increased. Intermediate-voltage analytical electron microscopes combined with high brightness field-emission gun (FEG) are expected to improve the MMF, while maintaining high spatial resolution. Additionally, the MMF should also be improved by maximizing the solid angle of X-ray collection.


2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (S02) ◽  
Author(s):  
K van Benthem ◽  
GS Painter ◽  
PF Becher ◽  
CI Contescu ◽  
NC Gallego ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document