scholarly journals A Simultaneous Observation of Lightning by ASIM, Colombia‐Lightning Mapping Array, GLM, and ISS‐LIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Montanyà ◽  
Jesús A. López ◽  
Carlos A. Morales Rodriguez ◽  
Oscar A. van der Velde ◽  
Ferran Fabró ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Montanya ◽  
Jesús Alberto López Trujillo ◽  
Carlos A. Morales Rodriguez ◽  
Oscar A. van der Velde ◽  
Ferran Fabró ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Peyrade ◽  
R Quidant ◽  
J.-C Weeber ◽  
A Dereux ◽  
G Lévêque ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (7) ◽  
pp. 2064-2079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Weiss ◽  
Donald R. MacGorman ◽  
Kristin M. Calhoun

Abstract This study uses data from the Oklahoma Lightning Mapping Array (OK-LMA), the National Lightning Detection Network, and the Norman, Oklahoma (KOUN), prototype Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) radar to examine the evolution and structure of lightning in the anvils of supercell storms as they relate to storm dynamics and microphysics. Several supercell storms within the domain of the OK-LMA were examined to determine whether they had lightning in the anvil region, and if so, the time and location of the initiation of the anvil flashes were determined. Every warm-season supercell storm had some flashes that were initiated in or near the stronger reflectivities of the parent storm and propagated 40–70 km downstream to penetrate well into the anvil. Some supercell storms also had flashes that were initiated within the anvil itself, 40–100 km beyond the closest 30-dBZ contour of the storm. These flashes were typically initiated in one of three locations: 1) coincident with a local reflectivity maximum, 2) between the uppermost storm charge and a screening-layer charge of opposite polarity near the cloud boundary, or 3) in a region in which the anvils from two adjoining storms intersected. In some storms, anvil flashes struck ground beneath a reflectivity maximum in which reflectivity ≥20 dBZ had extended below the 0°C isotherm, possibly leading to the formation of embedded convection. This relationship may be useful for identifying regions in which there is a heightened risk for cloud-to-ground strikes beneath anvil clouds. In one storm, however, anvil lightning struck ground even though this reflectivity signature was absent.


The 90° cross-section of the reaction 3 1 H( d , n ) 4 2 He has been investigated over the energy range 100 to 200 keV (energy of bombarding triton) using the 200 keV accelerating set of the establishment. Two methods have been used. As a preliminary experiment the yield of alpha-particles from a thick heavy-ice target was measured per unit charge of incident beam, as a function of deuteron energy, and the variation of cross-section deduced from the gradient of this excitation curve and the range energy relation for tritons in heavy water. Secondly, a comparison was made between the yield of alpha-particles from the D-T reaction and the yield of protons from the D-D reaction when a beam containing both deuterons and tritons was passed through a heavy-water vapour target. (The energy loss in this target was calculated as only a few hundred electron volts.) To do this a simultaneous observation was made of the protons and alpha-particles using the same counter. The values obtained for the cross-section have been compared with the resonance formulae given by Bretscher & French (1949) and by Tascbek, Everhart, Gittings, Hemmendinger & Jarvis (1948) and have been found to be in disagreement with formulae of this type. From considerations of the absolute magnitude of the cross-section it has been deduced that no conventional theory postulating reaction at a distance equal to the sum of the nuclear radii (cf. Konopinski & Teller 1948) will be able to explain this reaction. The evidence for a low-energy resonance (Allan & Poole 1949) is thought to be inconclusive.


2007 ◽  
Vol 401-402 ◽  
pp. 597-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuo Shimizu ◽  
Akio Takano ◽  
Masashi Uematsu ◽  
Kohei M. Itoh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document