Pharmacokinetics and drug dosing adjustments during continuous venovenous hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients

2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 929-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Bugge
2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 2974-2978 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Bilgrami ◽  
J. A. Roberts ◽  
S. C. Wallis ◽  
J. Thomas ◽  
J. Davis ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Use of high ultrafiltrate flow rates with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVHF) in critically ill patients is an emerging setting, for which there are few data to guide drug dosing. The objectives of this study were, firstly, to investigate the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with severe sepsis who are receiving high-volume CVVHF with high-volume exchanges (≥4 liters/h); secondly, to determine whether standard dosing regimens (1,000 mg intravenously [i.v.] every 8 h) are sufficient for treatment of less susceptible organisms such as Burkholderia pseudomallei (MIC, 4 mg/liter); and, finally, to compare the clearances observed in this study with data from previous studies using lower-volume exchanges (1 to 2 liters/h). We recruited 10 eligible patients and collected serial pre- and postfilter blood samples and ultrafiltrate and urine samples. A noncompartmental method was used to determine meropenem pharmacokinetics. The cohort had a median age of 56.6 years, a median weight of 70 kg, and a median APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) score of 25. The median (interquartile range) values for meropenem were as follows: terminal elimination half-life, 4.3 h (2.9 to 6.0); terminal volume of distribution, 0.2 liters/kg (0.2 to 0.3); trough concentration, 7.7 mg/liter (6.2 to 12.9); total clearance, 6.0 liters/h (5.2 to 6.2); hemofiltration clearance, 3.5 liters/h (3.4 to 3.9). In comparing the meropenem clearance here with those in previous studies, ultrafiltration flow rate was found to be the parameter that accounted for the differences in clearance of meropenem (R 2 = 0.89). In conclusion, high-volume CVVHF causes significant clearance of meropenem, necessitating steady-state doses of 1,000 mg every 8 h to maintain sufficient concentrations to treat less susceptible organisms such as B. pseudomallei.


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaroslav Radej ◽  
Ales Krouzecky ◽  
Pavel Stehlik ◽  
Roman Sykora ◽  
Jiri Chvojka ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 622-626
Author(s):  
Huub L.A. van den Oever ◽  
Marieke Zeeman ◽  
Polina Nassikovker ◽  
Carmen Bles ◽  
Fred A.L. van Steveninck ◽  
...  

Background: Clonidine is an α2-agonist that is commonly used for sedation in the intensive care unit. When patients are on continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in the presence of kidney dysfunction, the sieving coefficient of clonidine is required to estimate how much drug is removed by CVVH. In the present study, we measured the sieving coefficient of clonidine in critically ill, ventilated patients receiving CVVH. Methods: A total of 20 samples of plasma and ultrafiltrate of 3 patients on CVVH, using a standard 1.5 m2 polyacrylonitrile AN69 membrane, during continuous clonidine infusion were collected. After correction for the effect of predilution, we calculated the sieving coefficient for clonidine. Results: The mean sieving coefficient of clonidine was 0.52 (SD 0.097). Conclusion: Using a polyacrylonitrile AN69 membrane in a CVVH machine, the in vivo sieving coefficient of clonidine was 0.52.


2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 273-313
Author(s):  
Ronald J. DeBellis ◽  
Brian S. Smith ◽  
Pauline A. Cawley ◽  
Gail M. Burniske

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1184
Author(s):  
Soo Min Jang ◽  
Lenar Yessayan ◽  
Michael Dean ◽  
Gabrielle Costello ◽  
Ravi Katwaru ◽  
...  

(1) Purpose of this study: determination of adsorption and transmembrane clearances (CLTM) of imipenem and relebactam in ex vivo continuous hemofiltration (CH) and continuous hemodialysis (CHD) models. These clearances were incorporated into a Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), to develop drug dosing recommendations for critically ill patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT); (2) Methods: A validated ex vivo bovine blood CH and CHD model using two hemodiafilters. Imipenem/relebactam and urea CLTM at different ultrafiltrate/dialysate flow rates were evaluated in both CH and CHD. MCS was performed to determine dose recommendations for patients receiving CRRT; (3) Results: Neither imipenem nor relebactam adsorbed to the CRRT apparatus. The CLTM of imipenem, relebactam, and urea approximated the effluent rates (ultrafiltrate/dialysate flow rates). The types of hemodiafilter and effluent rates did not influence CLTM except in a dialysis flow rate of 1 L/h and 6 L/h in the CHD with relebactam (p < 0.05). Imipenem and relebactam 200 mg/100 mg every 6 h were sufficient to meet the standard time above the MIC pharmacodynamic targets in the modeled CRRT regimen of 25 kg/mL/h. (4) Conclusions: Imipenem and relebactam are not removed by adsorption to the CRRT apparatus, but readily cross the hemodiafilter membrane in CH and CHD. Dosage adjustment of imipenem/relebactam is likely required for critically ill patients receiving CRRT.


1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Capellier ◽  
Christian Cornette ◽  
Annie Boillot ◽  
Christiane Guinchard ◽  
Thierry Jacques ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document