Improving Disaster Mental Health Care Through Evaluation: Program Outcomes and Treatment Referrals

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fran Norris ◽  
Craig Rosen ◽  
Jessica Hamblen ◽  
Monica Matthieu ◽  
Siobhan Pietruszkiewicz ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. S225-S229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheryl H. Kataoka ◽  
Erum Nadeem ◽  
Marleen Wong ◽  
Audra K. Langley ◽  
Lisa H. Jaycox ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Kim ◽  
Yuriko Suzuki ◽  
Satomi Nakajima

The Lancet ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 378 (9788) ◽  
pp. 317-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Kim ◽  
Tsuyoshi Akiyama

The Lancet ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 378 (9788) ◽  
pp. 317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuriko Suzuki ◽  
Inka Weissbecker

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Saltini ◽  
Daniela Rebecchi ◽  
Chiara Callerame ◽  
Isabel Fernandez ◽  
Elisa Bergonzini ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Helen O'Sullivan

<p>Disaster mental health care is now a recognised nursing specialty in many countries, including Australia, Sweden and the United States of America (Raphael & Meldrum 1993). Despite compelling international literature on the benefits of disaster mental health response, (Myers 1993, Speier 1995),New Zealand has not followed these trends recognising the importance of such health care. Disaster mental health care is conspicuously absent in any meaningful form within our current health system. The majority of Crown Health Enterprise (CHEs), including Capital Coast Health Ltd and Midcentral Health Ltd preparedness plans imply only that mental health services will respond. Unfortunately, the plans say little of how these services are to be met or what is required in terms of knowledge, skills and resources to meet these objectives. The focus of disaster management in New Zealand is trauma orientated, directed towards the surgical, physical and medical needs of casualties. In his experience (Burkle, 1996) argues that triage and disaster management plans, for the most part, fail 3 to include in their classifications the primary casualty who also suffers acute psychological consequences of the physical trauma. New Zealand has experienced many memorable disasters that would seem to have been forgotten in the planning of health care, especially in relation to mental health care needs, both at the national and local service level of planning. The aim of this literature review is to inform the reader regarding knowledge of disaster health care issues such as understanding the impact, public health effects,clinical implications, interventions and the issues, problems and challenges that nurses in New Zealand can learn about mental health disaster preparedness and response. The ultimate goal of this review is to contribute towards the development and implementation of national health care standards and guidelines, focusing on the mental health aspects of disaster care in New Zealand. The framework chosen for this literature review is a combination of epidemiologic public health and service issues, rather than focusing on a singular nursing framework. This is intentional because in New Zealand, mental health nursing is hugely undeveloped or in the main, absent in this area. The frameworks used are expected to inform nursing in the professional provision of disaster mental health care. The rationale for the combination of frameworks used is that disasters affect a community in numerous ways and are considered a public health problem (WHO 1980). Noji (1991) points out that surveys have shown that each kind of disaster has its own common epidemiologic profile and pathologic characteristics. This is crucial in planning and in designing and implementing prevention activities. Within an epidemiologic framework, follow-up studies can assist in identifying risk factors for nurses that would serve as the basis for planning strategies in preventing or reducing impact related morbidity in future disasters. Practical applied and operational research can be useful for nurses in planning public health responses to future disasters. Within this framework it also provides nurses with information useful for client care and developing appropriate mental health relief response.Ideally, the disaster mental health team should be inter-disciplinary and multi-skilled - professionals. Disaster mental health nursing within inter-disciplinary teams is now a well recognised, but still developing specialty in overseas literature, (Myers 1993; Raphael & Meldrum 1993). This literature review supports an interdisciplinary approach as the preferred way of how nursing would fit within disaster mental health care. It is envisaged that the resulting discussion and recommendations form the background for further clinical research and/or background towards formulating health care policies and standards in regards to all aspects of service and professional provision of disaster mental health care in New Zealand, including nursing. It is imperative that both readers and health policy plamers alike are challenged into assisting with frameworks in the areas of preparedness planning, recruitment, training and other local and national relief efforts of various professional groups and disaster service organisations. There is an expectation that all services will respond in a disaster, including mental health. The current reality is that when the next disaster does strike, the public of New Zealand could be failed.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Helen O'Sullivan

<p>Disaster mental health care is now a recognised nursing specialty in many countries, including Australia, Sweden and the United States of America (Raphael & Meldrum 1993). Despite compelling international literature on the benefits of disaster mental health response, (Myers 1993, Speier 1995),New Zealand has not followed these trends recognising the importance of such health care. Disaster mental health care is conspicuously absent in any meaningful form within our current health system. The majority of Crown Health Enterprise (CHEs), including Capital Coast Health Ltd and Midcentral Health Ltd preparedness plans imply only that mental health services will respond. Unfortunately, the plans say little of how these services are to be met or what is required in terms of knowledge, skills and resources to meet these objectives. The focus of disaster management in New Zealand is trauma orientated, directed towards the surgical, physical and medical needs of casualties. In his experience (Burkle, 1996) argues that triage and disaster management plans, for the most part, fail 3 to include in their classifications the primary casualty who also suffers acute psychological consequences of the physical trauma. New Zealand has experienced many memorable disasters that would seem to have been forgotten in the planning of health care, especially in relation to mental health care needs, both at the national and local service level of planning. The aim of this literature review is to inform the reader regarding knowledge of disaster health care issues such as understanding the impact, public health effects,clinical implications, interventions and the issues, problems and challenges that nurses in New Zealand can learn about mental health disaster preparedness and response. The ultimate goal of this review is to contribute towards the development and implementation of national health care standards and guidelines, focusing on the mental health aspects of disaster care in New Zealand. The framework chosen for this literature review is a combination of epidemiologic public health and service issues, rather than focusing on a singular nursing framework. This is intentional because in New Zealand, mental health nursing is hugely undeveloped or in the main, absent in this area. The frameworks used are expected to inform nursing in the professional provision of disaster mental health care. The rationale for the combination of frameworks used is that disasters affect a community in numerous ways and are considered a public health problem (WHO 1980). Noji (1991) points out that surveys have shown that each kind of disaster has its own common epidemiologic profile and pathologic characteristics. This is crucial in planning and in designing and implementing prevention activities. Within an epidemiologic framework, follow-up studies can assist in identifying risk factors for nurses that would serve as the basis for planning strategies in preventing or reducing impact related morbidity in future disasters. Practical applied and operational research can be useful for nurses in planning public health responses to future disasters. Within this framework it also provides nurses with information useful for client care and developing appropriate mental health relief response.Ideally, the disaster mental health team should be inter-disciplinary and multi-skilled - professionals. Disaster mental health nursing within inter-disciplinary teams is now a well recognised, but still developing specialty in overseas literature, (Myers 1993; Raphael & Meldrum 1993). This literature review supports an interdisciplinary approach as the preferred way of how nursing would fit within disaster mental health care. It is envisaged that the resulting discussion and recommendations form the background for further clinical research and/or background towards formulating health care policies and standards in regards to all aspects of service and professional provision of disaster mental health care in New Zealand, including nursing. It is imperative that both readers and health policy plamers alike are challenged into assisting with frameworks in the areas of preparedness planning, recruitment, training and other local and national relief efforts of various professional groups and disaster service organisations. There is an expectation that all services will respond in a disaster, including mental health. The current reality is that when the next disaster does strike, the public of New Zealand could be failed.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naru Fukuchi ◽  
Shusaku Chiba

Abstract Background A long-term mental health support system for the community is sometimes needed following massive natural disasters. Although the Disaster Mental Health Care Center (DMHCC) was established as a long-term mental health care center in Japan, its exact role and functioning are unclear. The Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami (GEJE) of 2011 affected thousands of residents. The Miyagi DMHCC was established in Miyagi prefecture in response to the GEJE and supported residents and communities as a long-term mental health care center. Methods The main purpose of this study was to clarify which population is psychologically at high risk and which methods are useful for residents’ mental health in each phase. The study used data collected by the Miyagi DMHCC that included personal information of residents who were supported by the center from 2013 to 2018. Chi-square tests of independence were conducted on the annual number of individuals supported by the center, sex, and the number of support methods used by the center according to years. A one-way analysis of variance was conducted on the annual mean age, followed by a post-hoc comparison of the functioning of the center. Results The number of residents who needed mental health support dramatically increased in Miyagi prefecture after the 2011 disaster. The Miyagi DMHCC supported 6,850 individuals who sought mental health services, which accounted for 22.9% of all cases reported to the health services between 2012 and 2017. Based on the results, in the first few years, the elderly residents who lived alone were declared as high-risk individuals by the health survey and supported through home visits. Several years later, as younger people started to seek mental health support by themselves, they underwent counseling at the Miyagi DMHCC. Conclusion Residents who need mental health support might change depending on recovery phases. Long-term mental health care centers should observe community recovery and provide appropriate support. We discuss the implications of this result and future research directions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document