Improved Melody Recognition: Feature Binding or Feature Accessibility?

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. Dowling ◽  
Barbara Tillmann
Keyword(s):  
Feature Binding ◽  
Melody Recognition

Brain, Space, and Feature Binding

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn C. Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Feature Binding

The effects of orienting task and familiarity on remembering and knowing in melody recognition

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esra Mungan ◽  
Zehra F. Peynircioglu ◽  
Andrea R. Halpern
Keyword(s):  
Melody Recognition

Mechanisms of melody recognition

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh McDermott ◽  
Andrew J. Oxenham
Keyword(s):  
Melody Recognition

Learning of across- and within-task contingencies modulates partial-repetition costs in dual-tasking

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lasse Pelzer ◽  
Christoph Naefgen ◽  
Robert Gaschler ◽  
Hilde Haider
Keyword(s):  
Dual Task ◽  
Discrimination Task ◽  
Experimental Approach ◽  
Feature Binding ◽  
Dual Tasking ◽  
Single Task ◽  
Task Set ◽  
Task Processing ◽  
Tone Discrimination ◽  
Task Sets

AbstractDual-task costs might result from confusions on the task-set level as both tasks are not represented as distinct task-sets, but rather being integrated into a single task-set. This suggests that events in the two tasks are stored and retrieved together as an integrated memory episode. In a series of three experiments, we tested for such integrated task processing and whether it can be modulated by regularities between the stimuli of the two tasks (across-task contingencies) or by sequential regularities within one of the tasks (within-task contingencies). Building on the experimental approach of feature binding in action control, we tested whether the participants in a dual-tasking experiment will show partial-repetition costs: they should be slower when only the stimulus in one of the two tasks is repeated from Trial n − 1 to Trial n than when the stimuli in both tasks repeat. In all three experiments, the participants processed a visual-manual and an auditory-vocal tone-discrimination task which were always presented concurrently. In Experiment 1, we show that retrieval of Trial n − 1 episodes is stable across practice if the stimulus material is drawn randomly. Across-task contingencies (Experiment 2) and sequential regularities within a task (Experiment 3) can compete with n − 1-based retrieval leading to a reduction of partial-repetition costs with practice. Overall the results suggest that participants do not separate the processing of the two tasks, yet, within-task contingencies might reduce integrated task processing.

scholarly journals Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiji Ueno ◽  
Richard J. Allen ◽  
Alan D. Baddeley ◽  
Graham J. Hitch ◽  
Satoru Saito
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Feature Binding ◽  
Visual Feature

scholarly journals Toward a framework for the evaluation of feature binding in pigeons

2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S. Katz ◽  
Robert G. Cook ◽  
John F. Magnotti
Keyword(s):  
Feature Binding
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document