Generation Y Versus Ethnicity: Manipulating Political Identity Among College Students

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinda S. Jackson ◽  
Michael Vallerga ◽  
Clifton M. Oyamot
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Vallerga ◽  
Melinda S. Jackson

2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 33-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce M. Wolburg ◽  
James Pokrywczynski

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meihong Gu ◽  
Xin Wang

The micro era, when we can see big pictures through micro details, features in innovative individuation, decentralized open ecology and interactive democracy?during which the college students’ political identity faces challenges and dilemmas in different dimensions. Combining real problems, this essay proposes to enhance college students’ political identity from the perspective of ideological and political education, which embraces every college students, and embeds in every process as well as aspect. It pays attention to the multiple interactions of educational subjects to optimize the path of political identity education. Resource integration is embedded in students’ "micro-life" to strengthen the quality of political identity education. Education content and methods are innovated to build a pattern of ideological and political education.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Zeranski ◽  
Susan K. Whitbourne ◽  
Seth J. Schwartz

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-664
Author(s):  
Matthew Woessner ◽  
April Kelly-Woessner

ABSTRACTIn considering the liberalizing effect of college on students’ political values, we argue that political identities—in the form of self-identified ideology or partisanship—are components of social identity and are resistant to change. Using data from the Higher Education Research Institute’s student surveys, we show that what movement in identity does occur is mostly a regression to the mean effect. On several issue positions, however, students move in a more uniform leftward direction. We find that liberal drift on issues is most common among students majoring in the arts and humanities. Self-reported ideology does drift left at liberal arts colleges, but this is explained by a peer effect: students at liberal arts colleges drift more to the left because they have more liberal peers. The results have implications for future research on college student political development, suggesting that attitudinal change can be more easily identified by examining shifts in policy preferences rather than changes in political identity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 5-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda Avila ◽  
Jay-Sang Ryu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document