Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-406
Author(s):  
Sue L. Motulsky
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Gold Standard

scholarly journals Questioning Standards of Evaluation in Educational Research: Do Educational Researchers Ventriloquize Learners’ Voices in L2 Education?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Bolderiff ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Second Language ◽  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Educational Research ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Gold Standard

Learners are not stakeholders in their own education. Adhering to the quantitative gold standard in English as a Second Language (ESL) deprives the learner from having a voice in their learning process. This paper addresses voicelessness and ventriloquism in ESL, ventriloquism referring to the act of voicing the thoughts of another person, in this case the system overriding the learners’ experiences. This article addresses this problem, aligning itself with the Platinum standard while challenging the quantitative gold standard in ESL research. This paper offers resonance and semantic reliability as evaluative measures in educational research taken from literary criticism. The notion of resonance has been addressed in the literature on qualitative research since the dawn of the narrative turn; I address how resonance can be used in educational research.

Digital History Flexes its Muscle

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray G. Phillips ◽  
Gary Osmond
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Contemporary Society ◽  
Digital History ◽  
Digital Era ◽  
Source Materials

This concluding chapter discusses the potentially far-reaching impact of the intersection between history and the digital era. An important consequence of this discussion is the encouragement of experimentation in history making. Digital history, at its maximalist end, engages with the practice of experimentation by denaturalizing every dimension of traditional history: the dominance of qualitative research, traditional source materials, the practice of sole authoring, one-way scholarly communication, peer review, filter-then-publish models, linear narratives, intellectual property, and the viability of the monograph as the gold-standard, professionally approved, artifact. In these ways, “the digital does provide us with an important opportunity to explore the possibilities of reconsidering and reformulating the practice and value of history to contemporary society.”

Letter to the Editor: Response to Vermiglio, 2018, “The Gold Standard and Auditory Processing Disorder”

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 77-82
Author(s):  
Gail D. Chermak ◽  
Vivian Iliadou ◽  
Doris-Eva Bamiou ◽  
Frank E. Musiek
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Processing ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Auditory Processing Disorder ◽  
Letter To The Editor

1393: Ambulatory TURP-The New Gold Standard

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 378-378
Author(s):  
Arthur C. Pinto
Keyword(s):  
Gold Standard

1774: Nephron-Sparing Surgery as the New Gold Standard for T1 ≤ 7 CM) Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Contemporary Ucla Series

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 469-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Lam ◽  
Oleg Shvarts ◽  
Mehrdad Alemozaffarder ◽  
Hyung L. Kim ◽  
He-jing Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Nephron Sparing Surgery ◽  
Nephron Sparing
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document