Pupillometry during golf putting: A new window on the cognitive mechanisms underlying quiet eye.

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Campbell ◽  
Aidan P. Moran ◽  
Norma Bargary ◽  
Sean Surmon ◽  
Liz Bressan ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 551-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee J. Moore ◽  
Mark R. Wilson ◽  
Samuel J. Vine ◽  
Adam H. Coussens ◽  
Paul Freeman

The present research examined the immediate impact of challenge and threat states on golf performance in both real competition and a laboratory-based task. In Study 1, 199 experienced golfers reported their evaluations of competition demands and personal coping resources before a golf competition. Evaluating the competition as a challenge (i.e., sufficient resources to cope with demands) was associated with superior performance. In Study 2, 60 experienced golfers randomly received challenge or threat manipulation instructions and then performed a competitive golf-putting task. Challenge and threat states were successfully manipulated and the challenge group outperformed the threat group. Furthermore, the challenge group reported less anxiety, more facilitative interpretations of anxiety, less conscious processing, and displayed longer quiet eye durations. However, these variables failed to mediate the group–performance relationship. These studies demonstrate the importance of considering preperformance psychophysiological states when examining the influence of competitive pressure on motor performance.


2021 ◽  
pp. 102752
Author(s):  
Noah Jacobson ◽  
Quinn Berleman-Paul ◽  
Madhur Mangalam ◽  
Damian G. Kelty-Stephen ◽  
Christopher Ralston
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Klostermann ◽  
Ralf Kredel ◽  
Ernst-Joachim Hossner

To date, despite a large body of evidence in favor of the advantage of an effect-related focus of attention compared with a movement-related focus of attention in motor control and learning, the role of vision in this context remains unclear. Therefore, in a golf-putting study, the relation between attentional focus and gaze behavior (in particular, quiet eye, or QE) was investigated. First, the advantage of an effect-related focus, as well as of a long QE duration, could be replicated. Furthermore, in the online-demanding task of golf putting, high performance was associated with later QE offsets. Most decisively, an interaction between attentional focus and gaze behavior was revealed in such a way that the efficiency of the QE selectively manifested under movement-related focus instructions. As these findings suggest neither additive effects nor a causal chain, an alternative hypothesis is introduced explaining positive QE effects by the inhibition of not-to-be parameterized movement variants.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Causer ◽  
Spencer J. Hayes ◽  
James M. Hooper ◽  
Simon J. Bennett

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.M. Walters-Symons ◽  
M.R. Wilson ◽  
S.J. Vine

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan N. Vickers
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnon Lotem ◽  
Oren Kolodny ◽  
Joseph Y. Halpern ◽  
Luca Onnis ◽  
Shimon Edelman

AbstractAs a highly consequential biological trait, a memory “bottleneck” cannot escape selection pressures. It must therefore co-evolve with other cognitive mechanisms rather than act as an independent constraint. Recent theory and an implemented model of language acquisition suggest that a limit on working memory may evolve to help learning. Furthermore, it need not hamper the use of language for communication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document