Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology--Italian Version

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Galeoto ◽  
Mariele Colucci ◽  
Domenico Guarino ◽  
Giuseppina Esposito ◽  
Elisabetta Cosma ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 205031211667018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal Dey ◽  
Audrey Jones ◽  
Elaine M Spalding

Introduction: Telehealth technologies are being widely adopted across the globe for management of long-term conditions. There are limited data on its use, effectiveness and patient experience in end-stage renal disease. The aim of this pilot project was to explore patient acceptability of technology and evaluate its effect on clinical interventions and quality of life in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Methods: Peritoneal dialysis patients were provided with computer tablets (PODs). PODs contained a knowledge database with treatment- and symptom-based questionnaires that generated alerts for the clinical team. Alerts were reviewed daily and followed up by a telephone call or clinic visit. Interventions were at the discretion of clinicians. Data were recorded prospectively and quality of life and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology questionnaires evaluated at the start and end of the programme. Results: In all, 22 patients have participated over 15 months. The mean age was 61.6 years and PODs were utilised for an average of 341.9 days with 59.1% choosing to continue beyond the study period. We received a total of 1195 alerts with an average of 2.6 alerts per day. A total of 36 admissions were avoided and patients supported to self-manage on 154 occasions. Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology scores remained high throughout the programme although no improvement in quality of life was seen. Discussion: Telehealth is useful to monitor patients with renal failure on peritoneal dialysis. It is acceptable across age groups and provides an additional resource for patients to self-manage. Satisfaction scores and retention rates suggest a high level of acceptability.


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiannis Koumpouros ◽  
Alexandra Karavasili ◽  
Effie Papageorgiou ◽  
Panagiotis Siavelis

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadeel Bakhsh ◽  
Franco Franchignoni ◽  
Giorgio Ferriero ◽  
Andrea Giordano ◽  
Louise Demers

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2 mai/ago) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gláucia Sanches Guimarães ◽  
Marcelo Grandini Spiller ◽  
Lígia Maria Presumido Braccialli

Há diferentes dispositivos para facilitar o acesso ao computador, porém, poucos estudos para verificar a eficácia dos mesmos. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o desempenho de jovens ao utilizarem dispositivos de acesso ao computador. Participaram do estudo cinquenta jovens saudáveis com idades entre 15 e 25 anos. Para a coleta de dados foi utilizado computador com tela sensível ao toque, mouse e o Camera Mouse. Foram utilizados três softwares para avaliar tempo de reação e acurácia dos participantes: Discrete Aiming Task, Tracking Task e Single Switch Performance Test. Para conhecer o grau de satisfação de uso dos dispositivos, foi utilizado o Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology. O resultados demonstraram que nas atividades de precisão e tempo de reação, o mouse e a toque na tela foram os dispositivos que geraram os melhores desempenhos. Conclui-se que, o Camera Mouse foi o dispositivo que gerou os piores desempenhos.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2040031
Author(s):  
BUM-SUK LEE ◽  
JUNG AH LEE ◽  
HYUN CHOI ◽  
HAN RAM PAK ◽  
EUN JOO KIM ◽  
...  

More of power wheelchair users’ needs have to be met in the making of power wheelchairs. However, there has been no usability scale for the power wheelchair that is specifically focusing on the users’ needs. The purpose of this study was to test and validate a usability scale for power wheelchairs (USPW). The USPW has been developed through interviews with power wheelchair and consultations with a panel of experts. The USPW consists of four evaluation categories (safety, operation, efficiency, and satisfaction). In order to validate it, its usability and the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction Assistive Technology (QUEST) were also administered to 50 power wheelchair users. The USPW was extracted 12 items from safety, 7 from operation, 5 from efficiency, and 14 from satisfaction, with a total of 38 items. The content validity met the criteria. The total internal consistency (Cronbach’s [Formula: see text]) of the USPW was 0.75. Users of power wheelchair demanded that the safety of moving on the slopes, the satisfaction of storage space for power wheelchairs, and the repair service process would be improved. The correlation between the USPW and the QUEST was significant ([Formula: see text]). The USPW may be very useful to evaluate overall usability of power wheelchair including its safety, operability, efficiency, and satisfaction. The developed usability scale (USPW) may help wheelchair makers become aware of the problems of present power wheelchairs and the users’ needs, allowing them to make better ones.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document