The effect of fruit and vegetable intake on the development of lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 32 publications and 20 414 cases

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 1184-1192 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wang ◽  
S Qin ◽  
T Zhang ◽  
X Song ◽  
S Zhang
PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0217223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana E. Brondani ◽  
Fabio V. Comim ◽  
Liziane M. Flores ◽  
Lígia Araújo Martini ◽  
Melissa O. Premaor

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Hongrui Zhai ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Wenjie Jiang

Object. Results on the associations of fruit and vegetable intake with risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are still in conflict. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate the association between fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of COPD. Methods. PubMed, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for relevant studies published up to September 2019. Combined relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with the random effects model (REM). Dose-response relationship was assessed by the restricted cubic spline model. Results. There are 8 studies involving 5,787 COPD cases among 244,154 participants included in this meta-analysis. For the highest versus the lowest level, the pooled RR of COPD was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68–0.84; I2 = 46.7%) for fruits plus vegetables, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.79; I2 = 1.3%) for fruits, and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.63–0.92; I2 = 62.7%) for vegetables. In subgroup analysis of fruit plus vegetable intake and COPD risk, the inverse association exists in all three study designs. A nonlinear dose-response relationship was found for COPD risk with fruit (Pnon−linearity<0.01). Conclusions. This meta-analysis indicates that fruit and vegetable intake might be related to a lower risk of COPD.


BMJ ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 341 (aug18 4) ◽  
pp. c4229-c4229 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Carter ◽  
L. J. Gray ◽  
J. Troughton ◽  
K. Khunti ◽  
M. J. Davies

2014 ◽  
Vol 72 (7) ◽  
pp. 411-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ensiyeh Seyedrezazadeh ◽  
Masoud Pour Moghaddam ◽  
Khalil Ansarin ◽  
Mohammad Reza Vafa ◽  
Sangita Sharma ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Ruano-Ravina ◽  
Adolfo Figueiras ◽  
Olga Dosil-Diaz ◽  
Ana Barreiro-Carracedo ◽  
Juan Miguel Barros-Dios

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (10) ◽  
pp. 1087-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faezeh Saghafian ◽  
Hanieh Malmir ◽  
Parvane Saneei ◽  
Alireza Milajerdi ◽  
Bagher Larijani ◽  
...  

AbstractFindings from observational studies investigating the association between fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of depression were inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise available data on the association between fruit and vegetable intake and depression. A systematic literature search of relevant reports published in Medline/PubMed, ISI (Web of Science), SCOPUS and Google Scholar until Oct 2017 was conducted. Data from 27 publications (sixteen cross-sectional, nine cohort and two case–control studies) on fruit, vegetables and/or total fruit and vegetable consumption in relation to depression were included in the systematic review. A total of eighteen studies that reported relative risks (RR), hazard ratios or OR for the relationship were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled RR for depression in the highest v. the lowest category of fruit intake was 0·83 (95 % CI 0·71, 0·98) in cohort studies and 0·76 (95 % CI 0·63, 0·92) in cross-sectional studies. Consumption of vegetables was also associated with a 14 % lower risk of depression (overall RR=0·86; 95 % CI 0·75, 0·98) in cohort studies and a 25 % lower risk of depression (overall RR=0·75; 95 % CI 0·62, 0·91) in cross-sectional studies. Moreover, an inverse significant association was observed between intake of total fruit and vegetables and risk of depression (overall RR=0·80; 95 % CI 0·65, 0·98) in cross-sectional studies. In a non-linear dose–response association, we failed to find any significant association between fruit or vegetable intake and risk of depression (fruit (cross-sectional studies): Pnon-linearty=0·12; vegetables (cross-sectional studies): Pnon-linearty<0·001; (cohort studies) Pnon-linearty=0·97). Meta-regression of included observational studies revealed an inverse linear association between fruit or vegetable intake and risk of depression, such that every 100-g increased intake of fruit was associated with a 3 % reduced risk of depression in cohort studies (RR=0·97; 95 % CI 0·95, 0·99). With regard to vegetable consumption, every 100-g increase in intake was associated with a 3 % reduced risk of depression in cohort studies (RR=0·97; 95 % CI 0·95, 0·98) and 5 % reduced odds in cross-sectional studies (RR=0·95; 95 % CI 0·91, 0·98). This meta-analysis of observational studies provides further evidence that fruit and vegetable intake was protectively associated with depression. This finding supports the current recommendation of increasing fruit and vegetable intake to improve mental health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document