scholarly journals Multiple evolutionary origins and losses of tooth complexity in squamates

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Lafuma ◽  
Ian J. Corfe ◽  
Julien Clavel ◽  
Nicolas Di-Poï
Keyword(s):  
Late Jurassic ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Comparative Methods ◽  
Vertebrate Evolution ◽  
Phylogenetic Comparative Methods ◽  
Pattern Complexity ◽  
Evolutionary Origins ◽  
Complexity Increase

AbstractTeeth act as tools for acquiring and processing food, thus holding a prominent role in vertebrate evolution. In mammals, dental-dietary adaptations rely on tooth complexity variations controlled by cusp number and pattern. Complexity increase through cusp addition has dominated the diversification of mammals. However, studies of Mammalia alone cannot reveal patterns of tooth complexity conserved throughout vertebrate evolution. Here, we use morphometric and phylogenetic comparative methods across fossil and extant squamates to show they also repeatedly evolved increasingly complex teeth, but with more flexibility than mammals. Since the Late Jurassic, multiple-cusped teeth evolved over 20 times independently from a single-cusped common ancestor. Squamates frequently lost cusps and evolved varied multiple-cusped morphologies at heterogeneous rates. Tooth complexity evolved in correlation with changes in plant consumption, resulting in several major increases in speciation. Complex teeth played a critical role in vertebrate evolution outside Mammalia, with squamates exemplifying a more labile system of dental-dietary evolution.

scholarly journals Multiple evolutionary origins and losses of tooth complexity in squamates

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Lafuma ◽  
Ian J. Corfe ◽  
Julien Clavel ◽  
Nicolas Di-Poï
Keyword(s):  
Late Jurassic ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Comparative Methods ◽  
Vertebrate Evolution ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Phylogenetic Comparative Methods ◽  
Evolutionary Origins ◽  
Complexity Increase

Teeth act as tools for acquiring and processing food and so hold a prominent role in vertebrate evolution1,2. In mammals, dental-dietary adaptations rely on tooth shape and complexity variations controlled by cusp number and pattern – the main features of the tooth surface3,4. Complexity increase through cusp addition has dominated the diversification of many mammal groups3,5-9. However, studies of Mammalia alone don’t allow identification of patterns of tooth complexity conserved throughout vertebrate evolution. Here, we use morphometric and phylogenetic comparative methods across fossil and extant squamates (“lizards” and snakes) to show they also repeatedly evolved increasingly complex teeth, but with more flexibility than mammals. Since the Late Jurassic, six major squamate groups independently evolved multiple-cusped teeth from a single-cusped common ancestor. Unlike mammals10,11, reversals to lower cusp numbers were frequent in squamates, with varied multiple-cusped morphologies in several groups resulting in heterogenous evolutionary rates. Squamate tooth complexity evolved in correlation with dietary change – increased plant consumption typically followed tooth complexity increases, and the major increases in speciation rate in squamate evolutionary history are associated with such changes. The evolution of complex teeth played a critical role in vertebrate evolution outside Mammalia, with squamates exemplifying a more labile system of dental- dietary evolution.

scholarly journals Ardipithecus hand provides evidence that humans and chimpanzees evolved from an ancestor with suspensory adaptations

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. eabf2474
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Prang ◽  
Kristen Ramirez ◽  
Mark Grabowski ◽  
Scott A. Williams
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Comparative Methods ◽  
Early 20Th Century ◽  
Positional Behavior ◽  
Last Common Ancestor ◽  
Phylogenetic Comparative Methods ◽  
Anatomical Research ◽  
Vertical Climbing

The morphology and positional behavior of the last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees are critical for understanding the evolution of bipedalism. Early 20th century anatomical research supported the view that humans evolved from a suspensory ancestor bearing some resemblance to apes. However, the hand of the 4.4-million-year-old hominin Ardipithecus ramidus purportedly provides evidence that the hominin hand was derived from a more generalized form. Here, we use morphometric and phylogenetic comparative methods to show that Ardipithecus retains suspensory adapted hand morphologies shared with chimpanzees and bonobos. We identify an evolutionary shift in hand morphology between Ardipithecus and Australopithecus that renews questions about the coevolution of hominin manipulative capabilities and obligate bipedalism initially proposed by Darwin. Overall, our results suggest that early hominins evolved from an ancestor with a varied positional repertoire including suspension and vertical climbing, directly affecting the viable range of hypotheses for the origin of our lineage.

Evolution of vacuolar H+-ATPases: immunological relationships of the nucleotide-binding subunits

1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 306-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morris F. Manolson ◽  
Judith M. Percy ◽  
David K. Apps ◽  
Xiao-Song Xie ◽  
Dennis K. Stone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Bacterium ◽  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
Clostridium Pasteurianum ◽  
Chromaffin Granules ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Evolutionary Origins ◽  
Vacuolar Membranes

The evolution of the endomembrane systems of eukaryotic cells can be examined by exploring the evolutionary origins of the endomembrane H+-ATPases. Recent studies suggest that certain polypeptides are common to all H+ pumps of this type. Tonoplast H+ -ATPase from Beta vulgaris L. was purified and antibodies raised to two of its subunits. Each of these antisera reacted with a polypeptide of the corresponding size in bovine chromaffin granules, bovine clathrincoated vesicles, and yeast vacuolar membranes, suggesting common structural features and a common ancestor for endomembrane H+-ATPases of different organelles and different kingdoms. The antiserum raised against the 57-kDa polypeptide of plant tonoplast H+ -ATPase also reacted with subunit "a" of the H+-ATPase from the obligately anaerobic bacterium Clostridium pasteurianum and to the α subunit of the H+ -ATPase from Escherichia coli. There was no reactivity with chloroplast or mitochondrial ATPases. These results are discussed in relation to recent sequence data which suggest that endomembrane H+-ATPases may be evolutionarily related to the F0F1 ATPases.Key words: H+ -ATPase, evolution, immunology, vacuole, endomembrane.

scholarly journals Explaining large-scale patterns of vertebrate diversity

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 20150506 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Wiens
Keyword(s):  
Species Richness ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Comparative Methods ◽  
Phylogenetic Comparative Methods ◽  
Metabolic Rates ◽  
Diversification Rates ◽  
Richness Patterns ◽  
Current Species

The major clades of vertebrates differ dramatically in their current species richness, from 2 to more than 32 000 species each, but the causes of this variation remain poorly understood. For example, a previous study noted that vertebrate clades differ in their diversification rates, but did not explain why they differ. Using a time-calibrated phylogeny and phylogenetic comparative methods, I show that most variation in diversification rates among 12 major vertebrate clades has a simple ecological explanation: predominantly terrestrial clades (i.e. birds, mammals, and lizards and snakes) have higher net diversification rates than predominantly aquatic clades (i.e. amphibians, crocodilians, turtles and all fish clades). These differences in diversification rates are then strongly related to patterns of species richness. Habitat may be more important than other potential explanations for richness patterns in vertebrates (such as climate and metabolic rates) and may also help explain patterns of species richness in many other groups of organisms.

scholarly journals Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and the Evolution of Multivariate Phenotypes

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 405-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean C. Adams ◽  
Michael L. Collyer
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Analysis ◽  
Evolutionary Biology ◽  
Generalized Least Squares ◽  
Comparative Methods ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Phenotypic Integration ◽  
Phylogenetic Comparative Methods ◽  
Evolutionary Trends ◽  
Phenotype Space ◽  
Multivariate Phenotypes

Evolutionary biology is multivariate, and advances in phylogenetic comparative methods for multivariate phenotypes have surged to accommodate this fact. Evolutionary trends in multivariate phenotypes are derived from distances and directions between species in a multivariate phenotype space. For these patterns to be interpretable, phenotypes should be characterized by traits in commensurate units and scale. Visualizing such trends, as is achieved with phylomorphospaces, should continue to play a prominent role in macroevolutionary analyses. Evaluating phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) models (e.g., phylogenetic analysis of variance and regression) is valuable, but using parametric procedures is limited to only a few phenotypic variables. In contrast, nonparametric, permutation-based PGLS methods provide a flexible alternative and are thus preferred for high-dimensional multivariate phenotypes. Permutation-based methods for evaluating covariation within multivariate phenotypes are also well established and can test evolutionary trends in phenotypic integration. However, comparing evolutionary rates and modes in multivariate phenotypes remains an important area of future development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document