scholarly journals Comparing LAMA with LABA and LTRA as add-on therapies in primary care asthma management

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Kaplan ◽  
J. Mark FitzGerald ◽  
Roland Buhl ◽  
Christian Vogelberg ◽  
Eckard Hamelmann
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Control Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract The Global Initiative for Asthma recommends a stepwise approach to adjust asthma treatment to the needs of individual patients; inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the core pharmacological treatment. However, many patients remain poorly controlled, and evidence-based algorithms to decide on the best order and rationale for add-on therapies are lacking. We explore the challenges of asthma management in primary care and review outcomes from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses comparing the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) as add-on to ICS in patients with asthma. In adults, LAMAs and LABAs provide a greater improvement in lung function than LTRAs as add-on to ICS. In children, results were positive and comparable between therapies, but data are scarce. This information could aid decision-making in primary care, supporting the use of add-on therapy to ICS to help improve lung function, control asthma symptoms and prevent exacerbations.

scholarly journals Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Strategy 2021 - Executive summary and rationale for key changes

2021 ◽  
pp. 2102730
Author(s):  
Helen K. Reddel ◽  
Leonard B. Bacharier ◽  
Eric D. Bateman ◽  
Christopher E. Brightling ◽  
Guy G. Brusselle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Mild Asthma ◽  
Executive Summary ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Beta2 Agonist

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Strategy Report provides clinicians with an annually updated evidence-based strategy for asthma management and prevention, which can be adapted for local circumstances (e.g., medication availability). This article summarizes key recommendations from GINA 2021, and the evidence underpinning recent changes.GINA recommends that asthma in adults and adolescents should not be treated solely with short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA), because of the risks of SABA-only treatment and SABA overuse, and evidence for benefit of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Large trials show that as- needed combination ICS-formoterol reduces severe exacerbations by >60% in mild asthma compared with SABA alone, with similar exacerbation, symptom, lung function and inflammatory outcomes as daily ICS plus as-needed SABA.Key changes in GINA 2021 include division of the treatment figure for adults and adolescents into two tracks. Track 1 (preferred) has low-dose ICS-formoterol as the reliever at all steps: as-needed only in Steps 1-2 (mild asthma), and with daily maintenance ICS-formoterol (maintenance-and-reliever therapy, MART) in Steps 3-5. Track 2 (alternative) has as-needed SABA across all steps, plus regular ICS (Step 2) or ICS-long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) (Steps 3-5). For adults with moderate-to-severe asthma, GINA makes additional recommendations in Step 5 for add-on long-acting muscarinic antagonists and azithromycin, with add-on biologic therapies for severe asthma. For children 6-11  years, new treatment options are added at Steps 3-4.Across all age-groups and levels of severity, regular personalized assessment, treatment of modifiable risk factors, self-management education, skills training, appropriate medication adjustment and review remain essential to optimize asthma outcomes.

scholarly journals Tiotropium bromide: additional options for the treatment of bronchial asthma

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 67-74
Author(s):  
O M Kurbacheva ◽  
M E Dyneva
Keyword(s):  
Bronchial Asthma ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Biological Properties ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Tiotropium Bromide ◽  
Inhalation Therapy ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Successful Control ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting

Bronchial asthma (BA) is one of the most common chronic diseases, characterized by airway inflammation and bronchospasm. Symptoms of BA are wheezing, shortness of breath, a feeling of constriction in the chest and cough, the frequency and severity of which vary greatly over time. Today studies of BA phenotypes allow selecting treatment depending on the particular pathogenesis of each phenotype individually, thereby helping to achieve control, which is the main goal of BA therapy. However, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of airway innervation, since an increased parasympathetic tone is characteristics of all BA phenotypes and plays an important role in the development of bronchoconstriction and inflammation. Therefore, tiotropium bromide, which is a long-acting blocker of muscarinic cholinergic receptors, is one of the main bronchodilators in the treatment of BA. It blocks bronchoconstriction, hypersecretion and swelling of the mucous membrane of the airway, which in turn prevents the progression of inflammation, and the prolonged action of tiotropium bromide, which allows it to be used once a day helps to achieve control of asthma in addition to basic inhalation therapy - inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) long-acting P2-agonists (LABA). According to GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma), tiotropium bromide is recommended as an additional treatment, starting from step 4, and in accordance with the Russian Federal Clinical Guidelines for Bronchial Asthma - from step 3. Currently, according to clinical studies, much is known about the mechanisms of action and biological properties of tiotropium bromide, which made it possible to substantiate the needs for its administration to patients with BA regardless of its phenotype. This strategy will contribute to a more successful control of BA considering risk factors and comorbidity, thereby reducing needs of increasing ICS dose.

scholarly journals National Asthma Education and Prevention Program 2020 Guidelines: What’s Important for Primary Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (6 Supplement) ◽  
Author(s):  
Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Prevention Program ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Persistent Asthma ◽  
Asthma Severity ◽  
Asthma Education ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Primary Care Clinicians ◽  
Global Initiative

KEY TAKEAWAYS • The 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines: A Report from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group provides updated recommendations for 6 topics related to the management of individuals with asthma. • The classification of asthma severity and asthma control, as well as the concept of utilizing a stepwise approach to pharmacologic treatment, were not updated from the Expert Panel Report 3, released in 2007. • However, important updates in preferred therapies for intermittent and persistent asthma at treatment steps 1 through 5 were suggested. • Recommendations regarding biologic therapy were not included in the 2020 update, as only evidence and US Food and Drug Administration approvals through October 2018 were considered. • The most recent 2021 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines are not included in this review but can be used in a complementary manner to assist primary care clinicians to optimize decisions regarding the care of patients with asthma.

scholarly journals First analysis of the Severe Paediatric Asthma Collaborative in Europe registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 00566-2020
Author(s):  
Norrice M. Liu ◽  
Karin C.L. Carlsen ◽  
Steve Cunningham ◽  
Grazia Fenu ◽  
Louise J. Fleming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Asthma Control ◽  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Suboptimal Control ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Asthma Control Test ◽  
European Respiratory Society ◽  
Paediatric Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting

New biologics are being continually developed for paediatric asthma, but it is unclear whether there are sufficient numbers of children in Europe with severe asthma and poor control to recruit to trials needed for registration. To address these questions, the European Respiratory Society funded the Severe Paediatric Asthma Collaborative in Europe (SPACE), a severe asthma registry. We report the first analysis of the SPACE registry, which includes data from 10 paediatric respiratory centres across Europe.Data from 80 children with a clinical diagnosis of severe asthma who were receiving both high-dose inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β2-agonist were entered into the registry between January 2019 and January 2020. Suboptimal control was defined by either asthma control test, or Global Initiative for Asthma criteria, or ≥2 severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months, or a combination.Overall, 62 out of 80 (77%) children had suboptimal asthma control, of whom 29 were not prescribed a biologic. However, in 24 there was an option for starting a licensed biologic. 33 children with suboptimal control were prescribed a biologic (omalizumab (n=24), or mepolizumab (n=7), or dupilumab (n=2)), and for 29 there was an option to switch to a different biologic.We conclude that the SPACE registry provides data that will support the planning of studies of asthma biologics. Not all children on biologics achieve good asthma control, and there is need for new trial designs addressing biologic switching.

scholarly journals Interdisciplinary COPD intervention in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1801530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenifer Liang ◽  
Michael J. Abramson ◽  
Grant Russell ◽  
Anne E. Holland ◽  
Nicholas A. Zwar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Smoking Abstinence ◽  
Model Of Care ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Randomised Controlled

We evaluated the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary, primary care-based model of care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 43 general practices in Australia. Adults with a history of smoking and/or COPD, aged ≥40 years with two or more clinic visits in the previous year were enrolled following spirometric confirmation of COPD. The model of care comprised smoking cessation support, home medicines review (HMR) and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HomeBase). Main outcomes included changes in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), dyspnoea, smoking abstinence and lung function at 6 and 12 months.We identified 272 participants with COPD (157 intervention, 115 usual care); 49 (31%) out of 157 completed both HMR and HomeBase. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no statistically significant difference in change in SGRQ at 6 months (adjusted between-group difference 2.45 favouring intervention, 95% CI –0.89–5.79). Per protocol analyses showed clinically and statistically significant improvements in SGRQ in those receiving the full intervention compared to usual care (difference 5.22, 95% CI 0.19–10.25). No statistically significant differences were observed in change in CAT, dyspnoea, smoking abstinence or lung function.No significant evidence was found for the effectiveness of this interdisciplinary model of care for COPD in primary care over usual care. Low uptake was a limitation.

scholarly journals Adult Asthma Consensus Guidelines Update 2003

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (suppl a) ◽  
pp. 9A-18A ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Lemière ◽  
Tony Bai ◽  
Meyer Balter ◽  
Charles Bayliff ◽  
Allan Becker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Present Report ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Consensus Guidelines ◽  
Asthma Education ◽  
Adult Asthma ◽  
Early Introduction ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
New Evidence ◽  
Consensus Report

BACKGROUND: Several sets of Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma have been published over the past 15 years. Since the last revision of the 1999 Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, important new studies have highlighted the need to incorporate new information into the asthma guidelines.OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on adult asthma management published between January 2000 and June 2003; to evaluate the influence of the new evidence on the recommendations made in the 1999 Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines and its 2001 update; and to report new recommendations on adult asthma management.METHODS: Three specific topics for which new evidence affected the previous recommendations were selected for review: initial treatment of asthma, add-on therapies in the treatment of asthma and asthma education. The resultant reviews were discussed in June 2003 at a meeting under the auspices of the Canadian Thoracic Society, and recommendations for adult asthma management were reviewed.RESULTS: The present report emphasises the importance of the early introduction of inhaled corticosteroids in symptomatic patients with mild asthma; stresses the benefit of adding additional therapy, preferably long-acting beta2-agonists, to patients incompletely controlled on low doses of inhaled corticosteroids; and documents the essential role of asthma education.CONCLUSION: The present report generally supports many of the previous recommendations published in the 1999 Canadian Asthma Consensus Report and provides higher levels of evidence for a number of those recommendations.

scholarly journals Assessment of Asthma Control and Severity among Children According to Global Initiative for Asthma Guidelines in Sulaimani City-Iraq

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Adnan M. H. Hamawandi ◽  
Kosar M Ali ◽  
Ali Z. Naji
Keyword(s):  
Asthma Control ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Persistent Asthma ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Asthmatic Children ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Severe Persistent Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Gina Guidelines

Background: Asthma is a common and potentially serious chronic disease that imposes a substantial burden on patients, their families and the community. Objective: Assessment of the level of asthma control and severity in asthmatic children in Sulaimani city according to the global initiative for asthma (GINA) guidelines. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 82 patients who are known cases of asthma, aged 5 – 15 years , from 1st of March 2014 to 1st of August 2014. Results: Out of 82 patients in our study, 20.8%were classified as having intermittent asthma all of them have well controlled asthma, 42.7% of those classified as having mild persistent asthma 65.7% of them have well controlled asthma, 26.8% of those classified as having moderate persistent asthma 54.5% of them have partly controlled asthma, and 9.8%of those classified as having severe persistent asthma the majority of them 87.5% have uncontrolled asthma and none of them reached to the controlled asthma level according to GINA guidelines. Regarding the peak expiratory flow (PFT) we notice that 58.8% of asthmatic children who were classified as having intermittent severity, their PEF measurements ranged between 160- 250 l/min while those with severe persistent asthma 75% of them have readings between 50-150 l/min. Conclusion: Current levels of asthma control in the Sulaimani city fall far short of the goals specified in the GINA guidelines for asthma management. Also there is a strong correlation between PEF measurements and the level of asthma severity,

scholarly journals Perceptions of COPD patients of the proposed withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids prescribed outside guidelines: A qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 147997311985588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gill Gilworth ◽  
Timothy Harries ◽  
Chris Corrigan ◽  
Mike Thomas ◽  
Patrick White
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Airflow Limitation ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines support the prescription of fixed combination inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β-agonists in symptomatic COPD patients with frequent or severe exacerbations, with the aim of preventing them. ICS are frequently also prescribed to COPD patients with mild or moderate airflow limitation, outside guidelines, with the risk of unwanted effects. No investigation to date has addressed the views of these milder COPD patients on ICS withdrawal. The objective is to assess the views of COPD patients with mild or moderate airflow limitation on the staged withdrawal of ICS prescribed outside guidelines. One-to-one semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring COPD patients’ views about ICS use and their attitudes to proposed de-prescription were conducted. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was completed. Seventeen eligible COPD patients were interviewed. Many participants were not aware they were using an ICS. None was aware that prevention of exacerbations was the indication for ICS therapy or the risk of associated side effects. Some were unconcerned by what they perceived as low individual risk. Others expressed fears of worsening symptoms on withdrawal. Most with mild or moderate airflow limitation would have been willing to attempt withdrawal or titration to a lower dosage of ICS if advised by their clinician, particularly if a reasoned explanation were offered. Attitudes in this study to discontinuing ICS use varied. Knowledge of the drug itself, the indications for its prescription in COPD and potential for side effects, was scant. The proposed withdrawal of ICS is likely to be challenging and requires detailed conversations between patients and respiratory healthcare professionals.

scholarly journals The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA): 25 years later

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 1900598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Philippe Boulet ◽  
Helen K. Reddel ◽  
Eric Bateman ◽  
Søren Pedersen ◽  
J. Mark FitzGerald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Of Care ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Treatment Guideline ◽  
Global Strategy ◽  
World Health ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) was launched in 1993 under the auspices of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA, and the World Health Organization to produce a global strategy on asthma management and prevention. Now constituted as a non-profit entity, it continues to produce, on an annual basis, the most widely cited evidence-based report on the optimal management of asthma in both adults and children intended for global use. Although the GINA Report is often viewed and used as an asthma treatment guideline, it is designed to be a clinically oriented strategy document that supports the development of practice guidelines in different countries and regions.Other GINA products, including the report's pocket guides, teaching slide kits and implementation tools, are also offered free of charge for public use. The GINA Scientific Committee comprises recognised international experts from primary, secondary and tertiary centres of care who are actively involved in both the care of patients and research in asthma. The GINA Assembly is a forum for exchange of scientific information and discussions on initiatives to improve asthma care in various countries, focusing on implementation strategies. GINA plays a role in shaping research on the diagnosis and treatment of asthma and informs the development of point of care practice guides and decision support tools. GINA supports the objectives of raising awareness of asthma and improving access to therapy and quality of care for asthmatic patients, in addition to presenting and promoting continuously updated evidence-based treatment approaches for global use.

scholarly journals Pro: Inhaled corticosteroids for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Donald A. Mahler
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Exacerbation Rate ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Long Acting

Background: Controversy exists about the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although ICS are not approved as monotherapy for COPD, four ICS molecules, beclomethasone, budesonide, fluticasone furoate, and fluticasone propionate, are used widely in combination with long-acting bronchodilators to treat patients with this disease. Objectives: (1) To review the mechanisms of action of ICS therapy that contribute to the clinical benefits in COPD; and (2) to describe improvements in lung function, relief of dyspnea, increase in exercise tolerance, and the reduction in exacerbations with ICS use in COPD. Methods: A critical review of phase III and IV randomized clinical trials that evaluated ICS therapy in patients with COPD. Results: ICS have two major mechanisms of action in human airways: a reduction in edema and inflammation, and a decrease in airway hyperresponsiveness. ICS monotherapy significantly increases the morning peak expiratory flow rate and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (peak and trough) as early as the first day of treatment. Discontinuation of ICS therapy leads to deterioration in lung function. Treatment with ICS, alone and in combination with a long-acting bronchodilator, reduces dyspnea related to daily activities, whereas withdrawal increases breathing difficulty. Patients with COPD exhibit a significant increase in exercise duration with ICS therapy. The combination of ICS with one or more bronchodilators significantly reduces the exacerbation rate compared with bronchodilator therapy alone. The major serious adverse effect is an increased risk of pneumonia. Conclusion: Randomized controlled trials demonstrate that ICS therapy improves both physiologic and clinical outcomes in patients with COPD. These benefits are enhanced when ICS molecules are combined with one or more long-acting bronchodilators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document