scholarly journals Evaluation of LDL goal achievement in statin consumption, south east of Iran

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malihe Aghasizadeh ◽  
Saeede Khosravi Bizhaem ◽  
Mahin Baniasadi ◽  
Mohammad Reza Khazdair ◽  
Toba Kazemi
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Goal Achievement ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Intensity Pattern ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
Very High ◽  
Statin Use

AbstractLipid goal achievement and statin consumption were estimated at extreme/very-high/high/moderate and low cardiovascular risk categories. In the cross-sectional study, 585 patients treated with statin therapy referring to the heart clinic of Birjand were recruited. Patients were classified and examined LDL-C values and the proportion reaching targets according to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists guideline. Three patterns of statin use (high/moderate/low-intensity statin therapy) in all patients were examined and attainments of LDL-C goal in cardiovascular risk groups have been demonstrated. Over half the populations (57.6%) were in the very-high CVD risk group. The results showed that the proportion of patients meeting total LDL-C goal values according to the guidelines was 43.4%. The frequency of patient had achievement LDL goal lower in high-intensity pattern (N = 13, 2.3%), compared with moderate (N = 496, 86.1%) and low-intensity patterns (N = 67, 11.6%). In general, LDL-C goal achievement was greatest with moderate-intensity statin use. LDL-C reduction after statin consumption was estimated about one-third of the studied population. It seems likely that the achievement of a therapeutic target for serum lipids such as LDL-C improved is far more cost-effective and would be able to reach the target LDL as well changing the type and intensity of statins.

scholarly journals Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Risk in Lithuania—Results from EUROASPIRE V Survey

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Gediminas Urbonas ◽  
Lina Vencevičienė ◽  
Leonas Valius ◽  
Ieva Krivickienė ◽  
Linas Petrauskas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Blood Pressure Target ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Very High

Background and Objectives: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention guidelines define targets for lifestyle and risk factors for patients at high risk of developing CVD. We assessed the control of these factors, as well as CVD risk perception in patients enrolled into the primary care arm of the European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE V) survey in Lithuania. Materials and Methods: Data were collected as the part of the EUROASPIRE V survey, a multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional observational study. Adults without a documented CVD who had been prescribed antihypertensive medicines and/or lipid-lowering medicines and/or treatment for diabetes (diet and/oral antidiabetic medicines and/or insulin) were eligible for the survey. Data were collected through the review of medical records, patients’ interview, physical examination and laboratory tests. Results: A total of 201 patients were enrolled. Very few patients reached targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (4.5%), waist circumference (17.4%) and body mass index (15.4%). Only 31% of very high CVD risk patients and 52% of high-risk patients used statins. Blood pressure target was achieved by 115 (57.2%) patients. Only 21.7% of patients at very high actual CVD risk and 27% patients at high risk correctly estimated their risk. Of patients at moderate actual CVD risk, 37.5% patients accurately self-assessed the risk. About 60%–80% of patients reported efforts to reduce the intake of sugar, salt or alcohol; more than 70% of patients were current nonsmokers. Only a third of patients reported weight reduction efforts (33.3%) or regular physical activity (27.4%). Conclusions: The control of cardiovascular risk factors in a selected group of primary prevention patients was unsatisfactory, especially in terms of LDL-C level and body weight parameters. Many patients did not accurately perceive their own risk of developing CVD.

Abstract P071: Association Between Polyunsaturated Fat Consumption and Hypertension among Statin Users and Non-users

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James N Kiage ◽  
Uchechukwu K Sampson ◽  
Loren Lipworth ◽  
Sergio Fazio ◽  
Qilu Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pufa Intake ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Fat Consumption ◽  
Statin Use

Background: Numerous prospective studies suggest inverse associations between intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and cardiovascular outcomes. However, recent randomized studies have failed to demonstrate these benefits. One of the prevailing hypotheses is that the beneficial effects of PUFA may now be masked by the widespread use of statins, which lower lipids and blood pressure and are potent modulators of cardiovascular risk. Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that the association between PUFA and hypertension varies by statin use. Methods and Results: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis based on 74,658 black and white men and women in the Southern Community Cohort Study. Intake of PUFA was assessed by a food-frequency questionnaire, while history of diagnosed hypertension and statin use were self-reported. The mean±SD age was 52±9 years, body mass index was 30±8 kg/m 2 , and energy intake from PUFA was 8.0±1.8%. Sixty percent of the participants were women and 68% were African Americans. Hypertension (55%), statin use (16%), smoking (40%) and alcohol use (55%) were common in this cohort. In an adjusted logistic model with hypertension as the dependent variable, there was no interaction between PUFA intake and statin therapy ( P =0.13), whereas a significant inverse association was evident between PUFA intake and hypertension among non-statin users ( P for trend = 0.03) but not among statin users ( P for trend = 0.36) ( Table ). Conclusion: In conclusion, these results support a beneficial effect of PUFA consumption on hypertension, which is only apparent in the absence of statin therapy. These findings underscore the need to stratify by statin therapy when randomizing participants to cardiovascular interventions and support the notion that PUFA may be important in cardiovascular risk reduction in patients where statin therapy is not an option.

Abstract 17323: Personalizing Cholesterol Management Therapy Using Electronic Medical Records and Machine Learning

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T Ward ◽  
Jiang Li ◽  
Ashish Sarraju ◽  
Areli Valencia ◽  
David Scheinker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
One Year ◽  
Statin Use

Introduction: Optimal statin treatment decisions for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) rely on shared decision-making between patient and provider. We sought to develop a machine learning-based algorithm to personalize cholesterol treatment decisions using electronic medical record (EMR) data. Methods: We included EMR data for adults aged 40 to 79 with no prior ASCVD or statin therapy from an outpatient Northern California system between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2018 with at least two visits at least 1 year apart and at least two low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values. The outcome was the LDL-C measured closest to one year after a patient’s second visit. We modeled four different treatment decisions: no statin use, low-intensity statin use, moderate-intensity statin use, and high-intensity statin use. We trained weighted-K-nearest-neighbor (wKNN) regression models to identify similar patients using each line of therapy to a candidate patient. The algorithm compared outcomes of these similar patients and recommended the treatment which predicted the lowest LDL-C after one year. Results: Our study cohort consisted of 50,911 patients (age 54.6 ± 9.84 years, baseline LDL-C 122 ± 34.2 mg/dL, follow-up LDL-C 121 ± 35.9 mg/dL) including 54% female, 47% Non-Hispanic White, 32% Asian, and 7.5% Hispanic patients. Among 8,551 test patients visiting in 2015 or later, 96.9%, 3.08%, and 0.05% were recommended to begin high-intensity, moderate-intensity, and low-intensity statins, respectively. With these recommendations, the LDL-C values at 1-year follow-up were predicted to be 21.5 ± 43.5 mg/dL (17.6%) lower per patient, on average (Figure). Conclusions: EMR-trained wKNN models are able to determine patient LDL-C trajectories under different lines of statin therapy. Machine learning models leveraging real-world datasets may provide useful statin therapy treatment recommendations for primary ASCVD prevention.

scholarly journals Association of Impaired Vascular Endothelial Function with Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuan Zhong ◽  
Qingjiao Nong ◽  
Baoyu Mao ◽  
Xue Pan ◽  
Liuren Meng
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Endothelial Function ◽  
Cardiovascular Prevention ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Function ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional

Impaired vascular endothelial function has attracted attention as a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular prevention. The association between impaired endothelial function and cardiovascular risk in the asymptomatic population, however, has been poorly explored. We evaluated the association of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) with Framingham-estimated 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in subjects free of CVD, especially by cardiovascular risk profiles. In total, 680 adults aged 30-74 years were enrolled from Rongan and Rongshui of Liuzhou, Guangxi, China, through a cross-sectional study in 2015. In the full-adjusted model, the odds ratio for the estimated 10-year CVD risk comparing the low FMD (<6%) with the high FMD (≥10%) was 2.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21, 6.53;Pfor trend = 0.03). In subgroup analyses, inverse associations between FMD and the estimated 10-year CVD risk were found in participants with specific characteristics. The adjusted odds ratios, comparing the 25th and the 75th percentiles of FMD, were 2.77 (95% CI: 1.54, 5.00) for aged ≥60 years, 1.77 (95% CI: 1.16, 2.70) for female, 1.59 (95% CI: 1.08, 2.35) for nonsmokers, 1.74 (95% CI: 1.02, 2.97) for hypertension, 1.59 (95% CI: 1.04, 2.44) for normal glycaemia, 2.03 (95% CI: 1.19, 3.48) for C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/L, and 1.85 (95% CI: 1.12, 3.06) for eGFR <106 mL/minute per 1.73 m2. Therefore, impaired endothelial function is associated with increased CVD risk in asymptomatic adults. This inverse association is more likely to exist in subjects with higher cardiovascular risk.

scholarly journals Predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk using WHO/ISH risk prediction chart among urban population in Salem

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 5228
Author(s):  
K. Premanandh ◽  
R. Shankar
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Risk ◽  
Total Serum ◽  
Total Serum Cholesterol ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Very High

Background: Coronary vascular disease (CVD) risk estimation tools are a simple means of identifying those at high risk in a community and hence a potentially cost-effective strategy for CVD prevention in resource-poor countries. The WHO /ISH risk prediction charts provide approximate estimates of cardiovascular disease risk in people who do not have established coronary heart disease, stroke or other atherosclerotic disease.Methods: A total of 280 subjects between 40 to 70 years of age were included in this cross sectional study. Eligible households was selected randomly (every 5th household) for the interview using systematic random sampling. Age, gender, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, presence or absence of diabetes and total serum cholesterol were used to compute the total CVD risk using WHO/ISH CVD risk prediction chart. The chart stratify an individual into low (<10%), moderate (10% to <20%), high (20% to <30%), and very high (>30%) risk groups.Results: Moderate and high CVD risk were 12.14% and 7.5% respectively. Of total study participants, 2.5% had very high risk (>40%). High risk (binge drinking) alcohol drinkers (p=0.04) and abdominal obesity (p=0.0001) were significantly associated with higher CVD risk. Higher prevalence of behavioral risk factors was also reported in our study population.Conclusions: A large proportion of the population is at moderate and high cardiovascular risk. Risk stratification and identification of individuals with a high risk for CHD who could potentially benefit from intensive primary prevention efforts are critically important in reducing the burden of CVD in India.

scholarly journals Features and main problems of treating patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk with statins in real clinical practice (according to the data of the “PRIORITET” research)

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 52-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Yu. Martsevich ◽  
Yu. V. Lukina ◽  
N. P. Kutishenko ◽  
N. A. Dmitrieva ◽  
T. A. Gomova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Target Level ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Lipid Pattern ◽  
Very High ◽  
Real Clinical Practice ◽  
Group 1

Aim. To determine the features and main problems of statin therapy, as well as assess the possibility of achieving the target level of lipid pattern in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) in real clinical practice.Material and methods. The design of the “PRIORITET” observational program is an open observational study. Patients with high and very high CVR were divided into 3 groups in accordance with the initial data: (1) not taking statins, (2) taking statins, but not reaching the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, (3) taking statins with the achievement of the target LDL-C level, which is justified in replacing the statin inside the class — adverse effects (AE), high price, etc. Within 12 weeks 3 visits of patients to hospitals were carried out: baseline visit (B0), visit 1 month after the study initiation (B1) and visit 3 months after the study initiation (B3). The choice of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin was assessed by the doctors.Results. Groups 1, 2 and 3 included 112, 170 and 16 people, respectively. At B0, 145 (48,7%) patients were prescribed atorvastatin, and 153 (51,3%) — rosuvastatin. Three people dropped out of the study to B3, 295 patients completed the program. Lipid pattern of 285 patients were analyzed: 121 (41%) people (101 with very high CVR and 20 with high CVR) achieved the target LDL-C level, the remaining 164 (59%) patients (CVR — 156 and 8, respectively) — no. The most pronounced dynamics of LDL=C level was revealed in group 1, the differences between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 are highly statistically significant (p<0,0001). There were no differences in the frequency of reaching the target LDL-C level between patients taking atorvastatin or rosuvastatin. The target level of LDL-C (p=0,003) in the treatment of rosuvastatin in patients with high CVR was reached significantly more often than in patients with very high CVR. Also 3 non-serious AEs were reported. On average, in 9% of cases, reaching the target level of LDL-С during visits B1 and B3 was wrong interpreted by the attending physicians.Conclusion. The main problems of statin therapy in real clinical practice are the wrong interpretation of reaching the target level of LDL-C, inertness of doctors in titrating of statins doses and achieving the target level of lipid pattern. It may be the cause of reduced efficiency and deterioration of lipid-lowering therapy results in patients with high and very high CVR. The results of the “PRIORITET” study demonstrated the possibility of improving the practice of statins use and its accordance with clinical guidelines.Skibitsky V. V. on behalf of the working group of the “PRIORITET” researchWorking Group of the “PRIORITET” study: Voronina V. P. (Moscow), Zelenova T. I. (Moscow), Sladkova T.A. (Moscow), Alekseeva A. I. (Tula), Barabanova T. Yu. (Tula), Zotova A. S. (Tula), Kolomeitseva T. M. (Tula), Prikhod’ko T. N. (Tula), Pazelt E. A. (Nizhny Novgorod), Khramushev N. Yu. (Nizhny Novgorod), Skibitsky A. V. (Krasnodar), Alekseeva V. V. (Saratov), Lazareva E. V. (Saratov).

Statin dose titration patterns and subsequent major cardiovascular events in very high-risk patients: estimates from Swedish population-based registry data

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-331
Author(s):  
Jonas Banefelt ◽  
Maria Lindh ◽  
Maria K Svensson ◽  
Björn Eliasson ◽  
Ming-Hui Tai
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Population Based Registry ◽  
Very High

Abstract Aims Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intensive statin therapy in lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular (CV) events. Our objective was to examine statin titration patterns and the association between titration patterns and subsequent CV events in very high-risk patients. Methods and results Using Swedish national population-based registry data, we identified 192 435 patients with very high risk of atherosclerotic CV disease initiated on moderate-intensity statin therapy between 2006 and 2013. Outcomes of interest were titration to high-intensity therapy and the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) composite (myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and CV death) outcome. Cumulative incidence of MACE was assessed by titration status 1-year post-treatment initiation in patients adherent to treatment during the first year, using a 12-week cut-off from initiation to define early, delayed and no up-titration to high-intensity statins. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). In 144 498 eligible patients, early titration was associated with significantly lower risk of MACE in the subsequent 2 years compared to no up-titration (HR 0.76, P &lt; 0.01]. Delayed up-titration was associated with a smaller reduction (HR 0.88, P = 0.08). The majority of patients did not up-titrate. Conclusion Early up-titration to high-intensity statins was independently associated with lower risk of subsequent CV events compared to no up-titration. Delayed up-titration was not associated with the same benefit. Despite the higher risk associated with no up-titration, few patients at very high CV risk who started treatment on moderate-intensity up-titrated to high intensity, indicating a potential need for more aggressive lipid management of these patients in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Application of the 2014 NICE cholesterol guidelines in the English population: a cross-sectional analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (662) ◽  
pp. e598-e608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Ueda ◽  
Thomas Wai-Chun Lung ◽  
Philip Clarke ◽  
Goodarz Danaei
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nice Guidelines ◽  
Risk Threshold ◽  
English Population ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Using Data

BackgroundThe 2014 guidelines on cardiovascular risk assessment and lipid modification from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommend statin therapy for adults with prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD), and for adults with a 10-year CVD risk of ≥10%, estimated using the QRISK2 algorithm.AimTo determine risk factor levels required to exceed the risk threshold for statin therapy, and to estimate the number of adults in England who would require statin therapy under the guidelines.Design and settingCross-sectional study using a sample representative of the English population aged 30–84 years.MethodTo estimate 10-year CVD risk different combinations of risk factor levels were entered into the QRISK2 algorithm. The NICE guidelines were applied to the sample using data from the Health Survey for England 2011.ResultsEven with optimal risk factor levels, males of different ethnicities would exceed the 10% risk threshold between the ages of 60 and 70 years, and females would exceed the threshold between 65 and 75 years. Under the NICE guidelines, 11.8 million males and females (37% of the adults aged 30–84 years) would require statin therapy, most of them (9.8 million) for primary prevention. When analysed by age, 95% of males and 66% of females without CVD in ages 60–74 years, including all males and females in ages 75–84 years, would require statin therapy.ConclusionUnder the 2014 NICE guidelines, 11.8 million (37%) adults in England aged 30–84 years, including almost all males >60 years and all females >75 years, require statin therapy.

scholarly journals A community based cross sectional study to estimate total cardiovascular risk in rural Punjab

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1295
Author(s):  
Bibhava Vikramaditya ◽  
Mahesh Satija ◽  
Anurag Chaudhary ◽  
Sarit Sharma ◽  
Sangeeta Girdhar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
World Health ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Cross Sectional

Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are leading cause of non communicable deaths in India. CVD risk prediction charts by World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) are designed for implementing timely preventive measures. The objective of the study was to assess the prevalence of CVD risk parameters and to estimate total CVD risk among adults aged ≥40 years, using the WHO/ISH risk charts alone and also to assess the effect of the inclusion of additional criteria on CVD risk.Methods: A community based cross sectional study was conducted in fifteen villages of Ludhiana district under rural health training centre of Department of Community Medicine, Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab. Desired information was obtained using WHO STEPS survey (STEP wise approach to surveillance) from 324 adults aged ≥40 years. Anthropometric, clinical and laboratory measurements were also performed. WHO/ISH risk prediction chart for South East Asian region (SEAR-D) was used to assess the cardiovascular risk among the subjects.Results: WHO/ISH risk prediction charts identified 16.0% of the subjects with high risk (≥20%) of developing a cardiovascular event. The study population showed higher prevalence of physical inactivity, obesity, abdominal obesity, hypertension and diabetes. Amongst high risk CVD group, maximum prevalence was of hypertension and high perceived stress level. However, the proportion of high CVD risk (≥20%) increased to 33.6% when subjects with blood pressure ≥160/100 mmHg and /or on hypertension medication were added as high risk.Conclusions: A substantial proportion of this community is at high risk of developing cardiovascular diseases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document