A Generalized Block Replacement Policy with Minimal Repair and General Random Repair Costs for a Multi-unit System

1991 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shey-Huei Sheu
Keyword(s):  
Replacement Policy ◽  
Minimal Repair ◽  
Unit System ◽  
Repair Costs

OPTIMAL PERIODIC REPLACEMENT POLICY WITH CHECKING TIME

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 19-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHEY-HUEI SHEU ◽  
YAN-CHUN CHEN ◽  
LI-HSIU TENG
Keyword(s):  
Optimal Number ◽  
Replacement Policy ◽  
Inspection Time ◽  
Programming Formulation ◽  
Minimal Repair ◽  
Repair Costs ◽  
Inspection Strategy ◽  
Inspection Policy ◽  
Periodic Replacement ◽  
Replacement Time

This investigation considers a generalized inspection policy for a deteriorating production system with general random minimal repair costs. The inspection times for the inspection strategy are assumed to be non-negligible. Additionally, uncertainty probabilities associated with inspections are introduced. Using a dynamic programming formulation, the optimal inspection time for maximizing profit per unit time for a given overhaul/replacement time is determined. Next, the procedure is extended to determine the optimal periodic overhaul/replacement time, as well as the optimal number of inspections and their schedule.

Burn-in procedures for a generalized model

2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (02) ◽  
pp. 542-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hwan Cha
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Replacement Policy ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Failure Model ◽  
Minimal Repair ◽  
Optimal Replacement ◽  
Complete Repair ◽  
Optimal Replacement Policy ◽  
Type Of Failure

In this paper two burn-in procedures for a general failure model are considered. There are two types of failure in the general failure model. One is Type I failure (minor failure) which can be removed by a minimal repair or a complete repair and the other is Type II failure (catastrophic failure) which can be removed only by a complete repair. During a burn-in process, with burn-in Procedure I, the failed component is repaired completely regardless of the type of failure, whereas, with burn-in Procedure II, only minimal repair is done for the Type I failure and a complete repair is performed for the Type II failure. In field use, the component is replaced by a new burned-in component at the ‘field use age’ T or at the time of the first Type II failure, whichever occurs first. Under the model, the problems of determining optimal burn-in time and optimal replacement policy are considered. The two burn-in procedures are compared in cases when both the procedures are applicable.

A modified block replacement policy with two variables and general random minimal repair cost

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 557-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shey-Huei Sheu
Keyword(s):  
Operating System ◽  
Replacement Policy ◽  
Repair Cost ◽  
Minimal Repair ◽  
Expected Cost ◽  
Cost Rate ◽  
Age Dependent ◽  
Modified Block ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Random Part

This paper considers a modified block replacement with two variables and general random minimal repair cost. Under such a policy, an operating system is preventively replaced by new ones at times kT (k= 1, 2, ···) independently of its failure history. If the system fails in [(k − 1)T, (k − 1)T+ T0) it is either replaced by a new one or minimally repaired, and if in [(k − 1) T + T0, kT) it is either minimally repaired or remains inactive until the next planned replacement. The choice of these two possible actions is based on some random mechanism which is age-dependent. The cost of the ith minimal repair of the system at age y depends on the random part C(y) and the deterministic part ci (y). The expected cost rate is obtained, using the results of renewal reward theory. The model with two variables is transformed into a model with one variable and the optimum policy is discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document