Biomolecular theorem proving on a chip: a novel microfluidic solution to a classical logic problem

Lab on a Chip ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Hwan Lee ◽  
Danny van Noort ◽  
Kyung-Ae Yang ◽  
In-Hee Lee ◽  
Byoung-Tak Zhang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Geoff Sutcliffe

The CADE ATP System Competition (CASC) is the annual evaluation of fully automatic, classical logic Automated Theorem Proving (ATP) systems. CASC-J10 was the twenty-fifth competition in the CASC series. Twenty-four ATP systems and system variants competed in the various competition divisions. This paper presents an outline of the competition design, and a commentated summary of the results.


10.29007/6qpn ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans De Nivelle

We introduce a theorem proving strategy for Partial Classical Logic (PCL) thatis based on geometric logic. The strategy first translates PCL theories into sets of Kleene formulas. After that, the Kleene formulas are translated into 3-valued geometric logic. The resulting formulas can be refuted by an adaptation ofgeometric resolution.The translation to Kleene logic does not only open the way to theorem proving, butit also sheds light on the relation between PCL, Kleene Logic, and classical logic.


AI Magazine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoff Sutcliffe

The CADE ATP System Competition (CASC) is an annual evaluation of fully automatic automated theorem proving (ATP) systems for classical logic — the world championship for such systems. CASC provides a public evaluation of the relative capabilities of ATP systems, and aims stimulate ATP research towards the development of more powerful ATP systems. Over the years CASC has been a catalyst for impressive improvements in ATP.


2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 2932-2936
Author(s):  
Ling-zhong ZHAO ◽  
Xue-song WANG ◽  
Jun-yan QIAN ◽  
Guo-yong CAI

1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Abadi ◽  
Zohar Manna
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Alexander R. Pruss

It seems that counterfactuals and many other statements are subject to semantic underdetermination. Classical logic pushes one to an epistemicist account of this underdetermination, but epistemicism seems implausible. However epistemicism can be made plausible when conjoined with a divine institution account of meaning. This gives us some reason to accept that divine institution account, and hence some reason to think that God exists. This chapter evaluates the arguments for epistemicism and divine institution, including objections, and incorporates Plantinga’s consideration of counterfactuals when it comes to theism. In particular, an analogy is drawn with divine command and natural law theories in ethics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document