scholarly journals Regulation of the cell cycle and centrosome biology by deubiquitylases

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1125-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Darling ◽  
Andrew B. Fielding ◽  
Dorota Sabat-Pośpiech ◽  
Ian A. Prior ◽  
Judy M. Coulson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
A Cell

Post-translational modification of proteins by ubiquitylation is increasingly recognised as a highly complex code that contributes to the regulation of diverse cellular processes. In humans, a family of almost 100 deubiquitylase enzymes (DUBs) are assigned to six subfamilies and many of these DUBs can remove ubiquitin from proteins to reverse signals. Roles for individual DUBs have been delineated within specific cellular processes, including many that are dysregulated in diseases, particularly cancer. As potentially druggable enzymes, disease-associated DUBs are of increasing interest as pharmaceutical targets. The biology, structure and regulation of DUBs have been extensively reviewed elsewhere, so here we focus specifically on roles of DUBs in regulating cell cycle processes in mammalian cells. Over a quarter of all DUBs, representing four different families, have been shown to play roles either in the unidirectional progression of the cell cycle through specific checkpoints, or in the DNA damage response and repair pathways. We catalogue these roles and discuss specific examples. Centrosomes are the major microtubule nucleating centres within a cell and play a key role in forming the bipolar mitotic spindle required to accurately divide genetic material between daughter cells during cell division. To enable this mitotic role, centrosomes undergo a complex replication cycle that is intimately linked to the cell division cycle. Here, we also catalogue and discuss DUBs that have been linked to centrosome replication or function, including centrosome clustering, a mitotic survival strategy unique to cancer cells with supernumerary centrosomes.

Tubulin post-translational modifications and the construction of microtubular organelles in Trypanosoma brucei

1988 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 577-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Sasse ◽  
K. Gull
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Alpha Tubulin ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Microtubular Organelles ◽  
Tubulin Content

We have used specific monoclonal antibodies to facilitate a study of acetylated and tyrosinated alpha-tubulin in the microtubule (MT) arrays in the Trypanosoma brucei cell. Acetylated alpha-tubulin is not solely located in the stable microtubular arrays but is present even in the ephemeral microtubules of the mitotic spindle. Moreover, there is a uniform distribution of this isoform in all arrays. Studies of flagella complexes show that acetylation is concomitant with assembly of MTs. There is no subsequent major modulation in the content of acetylated alpha-tubulin in MTs. Conversely, polymerizing flagellar MTs have a high tyrosinated alpha-tubulin content, which is subsequently reduced to a basal level at a discrete point in the cell cycle. The MTs of the intranuclear mitotic spindle appear never to contain tyrosinated alpha-tubulin, suggesting that they are actually constructed of detyrosinated alpha-tubulin or that detyrosination is extremely rapid at this time in the cell cycle. T. brucei therefore, represents a cell type with extremely active mechanisms for the post-translational modification of alpha-tubulin. Our analyses of the timing of acquisition and modulation in relation to MT construction in T. brucei, suggest that acetylation and detyrosination of alpha-tubulin are two independently regulated post-translational modifications, that are not uniquely associated with particular subsets of MTs of defined lability, position or function. Post-assembly detyrosination of alpha-tubulin may provide a mechanism whereby the cell could discriminate between new and old MTs, during construction of the cytoskeleton through the cell cycle. However, we also suggest that continuation of detyrosination, allows the cell, at cell division, to partition into daughter cells two equivalent sets of cytoskeletal MTs.

scholarly journals The Human Kinesin Kif18A’s Neck Linker Permits Navigation of Microtubule Bound Obstacles within the Mitotic Spindle

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi L. H. Malaby ◽  
Dominique V. Lessard ◽  
Christopher L. Berger ◽  
Jason Stumpff
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Chromosome Alignment ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Fiber Dynamics ◽  
Robust Separation

AbstractMitotic chromosome alignment is essential for the robust separation of genetic material into daughter cells. In mammalian cells, this process requires the function of Kif18A, a kinesin-8 motor protein. Kif18A confines chromosome movement to the mitotic spindle equator by accumulating at the plus-ends of kinetochore microtubule bundles (K-fibers), where it functions to suppress K-fiber dynamics. It is not understood how the motor accumulates at K-fiber plus-ends, a difficult feat requiring the motor to navigate protein dense microtubule tracks. Our data indicate that Kif18A’s relatively long (17 amino acid) neck linker is required for the motor’s accumulation at K-fiber plus-ends. Shorter neck linker (sNL) variants of Kif18A display a deficiency in K-fiber accumulation, especially on K-fibers near the center of the spindle. This pattern correlates with the more uniform concentration of the microtubule bundling protein HURP on central K-fibers compared to peripheral K-fibers. Depletion of HURP permits Kif18A sNL to accumulate on central K-fibers, while HURP overexpression reduces wild-type Kif18A’s ability to accumulate on this same K-fiber subset. Furthermore, single molecule assays indicate that Kif18A sNL motors are less proficient at navigating microtubules coated with the microtubule associated protein tau. Taken together, these results support a model in which Kif18A’s neck linker length permits efficient navigation of obstacles such as HURP to reach K-fiber ends during mitosis.Signficiance StatementKinesin motor proteins play key roles in controlling chromosome alignment and segregation during cell division. The kinesin Kif18A confines chromosomes to the middle of the spindle by accumulating at the ends of microtubules attached to chromosomes. We show here that Kif18A’s ability to accumulate at the end of these microtubules requires navigation of microtubule-associated protein obstacles, and that this activity is imparted by a relatively long neck linker region. These findings demonstrate a molecular mechanism for navigation of densely populated microtubules inside a cell.

scholarly journals Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Sensor for Poly-ADP-Ribose

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 5004
Author(s):  
Ekaterina O. Serebrovskaya ◽  
Nadezda M. Podvalnaya ◽  
Varvara V. Dudenkova ◽  
Anna S. Efremova ◽  
Nadya G. Gurskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Fluorescent Proteins ◽  
Fluorescent Sensor ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Hydrogen Peroxide Treatment ◽  
Damage Response

Poly-(ADP-ribosyl)-ation (PARylation) is a reversible post-translational modification of proteins and DNA that plays an important role in various cellular processes such as DNA damage response, replication, transcription, and cell death. Here we designed a fully genetically encoded fluorescent sensor for poly-(ADP-ribose) (PAR) based on Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). The WWE domain, which recognizes iso-ADP-ribose internal PAR-specific structural unit, was used as a PAR-targeting module. The sensor consisted of cyan Turquoise2 and yellow Venus fluorescent proteins, each in fusion with the WWE domain of RNF146 E3 ubiquitin ligase protein. This bipartite sensor named sPARroW (sensor for PAR relying on WWE) enabled monitoring of PAR accumulation and depletion in live mammalian cells in response to different stimuli, namely hydrogen peroxide treatment, UV irradiation and hyperthermia.

scholarly journals Cytokinesis in Eukaryotic Cells: The Furrow Complexity at a Glance

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Fraschini
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Animal Cell ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Model Organism ◽  
Complex Phase ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Viable Cells ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Duplication Cycle

The duplication cycle is the fascinating process that, starting from a cell, results in the formation of two daughter cells and it is essential for life. Cytokinesis is the final step of the cell cycle, it is a very complex phase, and is a concert of forces, remodeling, trafficking, and cell signaling. All of the steps of cell division must be properly coordinated with each other to faithfully segregate the genetic material and this task is fundamental for generating viable cells. Given the importance of this process, molecular pathways and proteins that are involved in cytokinesis are conserved from yeast to humans. In this review, we describe symmetric and asymmetric cell division in animal cell and in a model organism, budding yeast. In addition, we illustrate the surveillance mechanisms that ensure a proper cell division and discuss the connections with normal cell proliferation and organs development and with the occurrence of human diseases.

scholarly journals Cell-cycle coupled expression minimizes random fluctuations in gene product levels

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Soltani ◽  
Abhyudai Singh
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Stochastic Component ◽  
Stochastic Expression ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Intrinsic Stochasticity ◽  
Random Fluctuations ◽  
Cell To Cell Variability

AbstractExpression of many genes varies as a cell transitions through different cell-cycle stages. How coupling between stochastic expression and cell cycle impacts cell-to-cell variability (noise) in the level of protein is not well understood. We analyze a model, where a stable protein is synthesized in random bursts, and the frequency with which bursts occur varies within the cell cycle. Formulas quantifying the extent of fluctuations in the protein copy number are derived and decomposed into components arising from the cell cycle and stochastic processes. The latter stochastic component represents contributions from bursty expression and errors incurred during partitioning of molecules between daughter cells. These formulas reveal an interesting trade-off: cell-cycle dependencies that amplify the noise contribution from bursty expression also attenuate the contribution from partitioning errors. We investigate existence of optimum strategies for coupling expression to the cell cycle that minimize the stochastic component. Intriguingly, results show that a zero production rate throughout the cell cycle, with expression only occurring just before cell division minimizes noise from bursty expression for a fixed mean protein level. In contrast, the optimal strategy in the case of partitioning errors is to make the protein just after cell division. We provide examples of regulatory proteins that are expressed only towards the end of cell cycle, and argue that such strategies enhance robustness of cell-cycle decisions to the intrinsic stochasticity of gene expression.

scholarly journals The FACT complex and cell cycle progression are essential to maintain asymmetric transcription factor partitioning during cell division

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Herrero ◽  
Sonia Stinus ◽  
Eleanor Bellows ◽  
Peter H Thorpe
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Reverse Genetic Screen

AbstractThe polarized partitioning of proteins in cells underlies asymmetric cell division, which is an important driver of development and cellular diversity. Like most cells, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae divides asymmetrically to give two distinct daughter cells. This asymmetry mimics that seen in metazoans and the key regulatory proteins are conserved from yeast to human. A well-known example of an asymmetric protein is the transcription factor Ace2, which localizes specifically to the daughter nucleus, where it drives a daughter-specific transcriptional network. We performed a reverse genetic screen to look for regulators of asymmetry based on the Ace2 localization phenotype. We screened a collection of essential genes in order to analyze the effect of core cellular processes in asymmetric cell division. This identified a large number of mutations that are known to affect progression through the cell cycle, suggesting that cell cycle delay is sufficient to disrupt Ace2 asymmetry. To test this model we blocked cells from progressing through mitosis and found that prolonged cell cycle arrest is sufficient to disrupt Ace2 asymmetry after release. We also demonstrate that members of the evolutionary conserved FACT chromatin-remodeling complex are required for both asymmetric and cell cycle-regulated localization of Ace2.

scholarly journals Concurrent processes setE. colicell division

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. eaau3324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Micali ◽  
Jacopo Grilli ◽  
Matteo Osella ◽  
Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Concurrent Processes ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Rate Limiting ◽  
Cell Data

A cell can divide only upon completion of chromosome segregation; otherwise, its daughters would lose genetic material. However, we do not know whether the partitioning of chromosomes is the key event for the decision to divide. We show how key trends in single-cell data reject the classic idea of replication-segregation as the rate-limiting process for cell division. Instead, the data agree with a model where two concurrent processes (setting replication initiation and interdivision time) set cell division on competing time scales. During each cell cycle, division is set by the slowest process (an “AND” gate). The concept of transitions between cell cycle stages as decisional processes integrating multiple inputs instead of cascading from orchestrated steps can affect the way we think of the cell cycle in general.

scholarly journals DNA replication and mitotic entry: A brake model for cell cycle progression

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (12) ◽  
pp. 3892-3902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bennie Lemmens ◽  
Arne Lindqvist
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Cycle Model ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Core Function ◽  
A Cell

The core function of the cell cycle is to duplicate the genome and divide the duplicated DNA into two daughter cells. These processes need to be carefully coordinated, as cell division before DNA replication is complete leads to genome instability and cell death. Recent observations show that DNA replication, far from being only a consequence of cell cycle progression, plays a key role in coordinating cell cycle activities. DNA replication, through checkpoint kinase signaling, restricts the activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that promote cell division. The S/G2 transition is therefore emerging as a crucial regulatory step to determine the timing of mitosis. Here we discuss recent observations that redefine the coupling between DNA replication and cell division and incorporate these insights into an updated cell cycle model for human cells. We propose a cell cycle model based on a single trigger and sequential releases of three molecular brakes that determine the kinetics of CDK activation.

Cytostellin: a novel, highly conserved protein that undergoes continuous redistribution during the cell cycle

1992 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.L. Warren ◽  
A.S. Landolfi ◽  
C. Curtis ◽  
J.S. Morrow
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Immunoblot Analysis ◽  
Cytoplasmic Proteins ◽  
Spindle Apparatus ◽  
Nuclease Digestion ◽  
Cell Processes ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cycle Dependent

Cytostellin, a 240 kDa protein, has been purified from mammalian cells by immunoaffinity chromatography using monoclonal antibody H5. Immunofluorescence microscopy shows diffuse and punctate cytostellin immunoreactivity in interphase nuclei. Nuclease digestion and salt extraction are not required to expose the epitope. The onset of prophase is marked by the appearance of multiple intensely immunofluorescent cytostellin-containing ‘bodies’ within the nucleus. Nuclear disassembly is heralded by the movement of cytostellin bodies from the nucleus to multiple positions throughout the cell. Cytostellin bodies in metaphase, anaphase and telophase cells are widely dispersed, including some in cell processes far removed from the mitotic spindle apparatus. However, a distinct subset of larger, more intensely staining bodies surrounds the mitotic spindle apparatus. Cytostellin bodies remain in the cytoplasm of the daughter cells and disappear after the appearance of nascent nuclei. Cytostellin is immunologically distinct from other nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins, and it has been detected by immunoblot analysis in all species tested from yeast to humans. Based upon these findings, we postulate that cytostellin has a cell cycle-dependent function which is conserved in higher and lower eukaryotic cells.

scholarly journals Dem Anfang auf der Spur — die Suche nach DNA-Replikationsursprüngen

BIOspektrum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-249
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Kruse ◽  
Stephan Hamperl
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Uniform Method ◽  
Replication Origins ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Origins Of Replication ◽  
Mammalian Genomes ◽  
Comprehensive Manner

AbstractTimely and accurate duplication of DNA prior to cell division is a prerequisite for propagation of the genetic material to both daughter cells. DNA synthesis initiates at discrete sites, termed replication origins, and proceeds in a bidirectional manner until all genomic DNA is replicated. Despite the fundamental nature of these events, a uniform method that identifies origins of replication in a comprehensive manner is still missing. Here, we present currently available and discuss new approaches to map replication origins in mammalian genomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document