Losartan, an angiotensin type I receptor antagonist, improves conduit vessel endothelial function in Type II diabetes

2000 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig CHEETHAM ◽  
Gerard O'DRISCOLL ◽  
Kim STANTON ◽  
Roger TAYLOR ◽  
Daniel GREEN

We have demonstrated previously that inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) with enalapril and angiotensin II blockade with losartan improve acetylcholine-dependent endothelial function in resistance vessels of patients with Type II diabetes. It was therefore of interest to examine the effect of losartan on conduit vessel function in this group. The influence of losartan (50 mg daily for 4 weeks) on endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilator function was determined in 12 subjects with Type II diabetes using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover protocol. Conduit vessel endothelial function was assessed using high-resolution ultrasound and the brachial artery response to reactive hyperaemia (flow-mediated dilation; FMD); glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) was used as a non-endothelium-dependent dilator. Losartan administration significantly increased the FMD response from 5.2±0.7% (mean±S.E.M.) to 7.4±0.6% of vessel diameter (P < 0.05; paired t-test). There was no effect of losartan on the endothelium-independent responses to GTN (17.8±1.8% to 17.6±1.2%). Consistent with our previous findings in resistance vessels, administration of 50 mg of losartan daily improves NO-mediated dilation in the conduit vessels of subjects with Type II diabetes. Together with the findings that both ACE inhibition and angiotensin II blockade improve resistance vessel function in this group, it is likely that at least some of the beneficial effect is mediated through the angiotensin II/type 1 receptor pathway. A type 1 receptor antagonist seems a reasonable alternative to an ACE inhibitor to maintain conduit vessel endothelial function in Type II diabetic subjects.

2001 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig CHEETHAM ◽  
Gerard O’DRISCOLL ◽  
Kim STANTON ◽  
Roger TAYLOR ◽  
Daniel GREEN

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 2745-2754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Trachtman ◽  
Peter Nelson ◽  
Sharon Adler ◽  
Kirk N. Campbell ◽  
Abanti Chaudhuri ◽  
...  

BackgroundWe evaluated and compared the effects of sparsentan, a dual endothelin type A (ETA) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, with those of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with primary FSGS.MethodsIn this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, active-control Efficacy and Safety of Sparsentan (RE-021), a Dual Endothelin Receptor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, in Patients with Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS): A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Control, Dose-Escalation Study (DUET), patients aged 8–75 years with biopsy-proven FSGS, eGFR>30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UP/C) ≥1.0 g/g received sparsentan (200, 400, or 800 mg/d) or irbesartan (300 mg/d) for 8 weeks, followed by open-label sparsentan only. End points at week 8 were reduction from baseline in UP/C (primary) and proportion of patients achieving FSGS partial remission end point (FPRE) (UP/C: ≤1.5 g/g and >40% reduction [secondary]).ResultsOf 109 patients randomized, 96 received study drugs and had baseline and week 8 UP/C measurements. Sparsentan-treated patients had greater reductions in UP/C than irbesartan-treated patients did when all doses (45% versus 19%; P=0.006) or the 400 and 800 mg doses (47% versus 19%; P=0.01) were pooled for analysis. The FSGS partial remission end point was achieved in 28% of sparsentan-treated and 9% of irbesartan-treated patients (P=0.04). After 8 weeks of treatment, BP was reduced with sparsentan but not irbesartan, and eGFR was stable with both treatments. Overall, the incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. Hypotension and edema were more common among sparsentan-treated patients but did not result in study withdrawals.ConclusionsPatients with FSGS achieved significantly greater reductions in proteinuria after 8 weeks of sparsentan versus irbesartan. Sparsentan was safe and well tolerated.


2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 2211-2217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyoshi Kajihara ◽  
Takahiro Nishida ◽  
Noriko Boku ◽  
Hideki Tatewaki ◽  
Masataka Eto ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 516-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Ott ◽  
Markus P Schlaich ◽  
Joanna Harazny ◽  
Bernhard MW Schmidt ◽  
Georg Michelson ◽  
...  

Human Cell ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michio KOSUGI ◽  
Akira MIYAJIMA ◽  
Eiji KIKUCHI ◽  
Takeo KOSAKA ◽  
Yutaka HORIGUCHI ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Itoh ◽  
Y. Takeishi ◽  
Shigekazu Nakada ◽  
Takuya Miyamoto ◽  
Yuichi Tsunoda ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document