Realities, Myths, and Challenges of Newborn Hearing Screening in the United States

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl R. White
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Grosse ◽  
Craig Mason ◽  
Marcus Gaffney ◽  
Vickie Thomson ◽  
Karl White

Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS), when accompanied by timely access to intervention services, can improve language outcomes for children born deaf or hard of hearing (D/HH) and result in economic benefits to society. Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs promote UNHS and using information systems support access to follow-up diagnostic and early intervention services so that infants can be screened no later than 1 month of age, with those who do not pass their screen receiving diagnostic evaluation no later than 3 months of age, and those with diagnosed hearing loss receiving intervention services no later than 6 months of age. In this paper, we first document the rapid roll-out of UNHS/EHDI policies and programs at the national and state/territorial levels in the United States between 1997 and 2005. We then review cost analyses and economic arguments that were made in advancing those policies in the United States. Finally, we examine evidence on language and educational outcomes that pertain to the economic benefits of UNHS/EHDI. In conclusion, although formal cost-effectiveness analyses do not appear to have played a decisive role, informal economic assessments of costs and benefits appear to have contributed to the adoption of UNHS policies in the United States.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 126 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S3-S6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley A. Russ ◽  
Karl White ◽  
Denise Dougherty ◽  
Irene Forsman

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 957-957
Author(s):  

We believe that universal newborn hearing screening is a necessity. Data indicate that the High Risk Register currently used in many hospitals and recommended by Bess and Paradise only identifies about 50% of congenital hearing impairments. Causing further consternation is the fact that the average age of identification of hearing impairment in the United States remains at 3 years of age. We know that 1/1000 children are born deaf and about 7/1000 have bilateral hearing impairments in the mild to severe range.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Caitlin Sapp ◽  
Jonathan Stirn ◽  
Tammy O'Hollearn ◽  
Elizabeth A. Walker

Purpose Lack of timely and proximal access to diagnostic hearing evaluation using auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing hampers the effectiveness of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs in the United States. This study measured the impact of a state-based quality-improvement (QI) project that provided diagnostic ABR equipment and training to educational audiologists distributed throughout Iowa in regional special education centers. Method We used de-identified administrative data generated by the state EHDI program to analyze markers of access to early hearing health care for infants in a preproject condition (“Baseline”) compared to the implementation of diagnostic ABRs at the regional special education centers (“QI Project”). Results Our findings revealed that the QI Project was associated with improvements in timeliness of first hearing evaluation, distance traveled for first hearing evaluation, and likelihood of receiving on-guideline audiology care during the first hearing evaluation. Conclusions Following the onset of the QI Project, infants and their families had greater access to initial hearing evaluation after failed newborn hearing screening. This improvement could have cascading effects on timeliness of later intervention among those with confirmed permanent childhood hearing loss.


1995 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl R. White ◽  
Thomas R. Behrens ◽  
Bonnie Strickland

Although the importance of identifying significant hearing loss at an early age has long been recognized, it is generally acknowledged that newborn hearing screening programs in the United States have not been very successful. The problem has been that available techniques were impractical, too expensive, or invalid. This article summarizes the data regarding the use of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) in a universal newborn hearing screening program and describes various facets of program implementation. It is concluded that available data provide clear evidence that TEOAE can be used to significantly reduce the average age of identification for hearing loss in the U.S.


1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Terrey Oliver Penn ◽  
Susan E. Abbott

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Tharpe ◽  
Ellen Wright Clayton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document