P53 codon 72 polymorphism and human papillomavirus type in relation to cervical cancer in South African women

2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Pegoraro ◽  
L. Rom ◽  
P. A. Lanning ◽  
M. Moodley ◽  
S. Naiker ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 2004-2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Min-Min ◽  
X. Ming-Rong ◽  
C. Ze-Yi ◽  
Y. Kai-Xuan ◽  
S. Zhi-Lin

The aim of this study was to analysis the relationship between p53 codon 72 polymorphism with human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and 18 E6 in Chinese cervical cancer. A total of 81 cervical squamous cancer (specimens of G1, G2, and G3 are 13, 24, and 44, respectively; and of stage IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA are 15, 37, 24, and 5, respectively), 18 cervical adenocarcinoma, 88 cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN) (specimens of CIN II and III are 30 and 58), and 60 normal cervical specimens were included in this study. Polymerase chain reaction was used to examine p53 genotypes and HPV 16 and 18 E6. The frequencies of p53 Arg homozygosity in cervical squamous cancer, cervical adenocarcinoma, and CIN (II–III) were 58.02%, 55.55%, and 59.09%, respectively, that was much higher than that of p53 Arg/Pro heterozygosity (30.86%, 27.78%, and 21.59%) and of p53 Pro homozygosity (11.12%, 16.67%, and 19.32%) in each groups and higher than the frequency of p53 Arg homozygosity in normal samples (23.33%). There is no statistic difference in the normal samples for the frequency of p53 Arg homozygosity, p53 Arg/Pro heterozygosity, and p53 Pro homozygosity (23.33%, 40.00%, and 36.67%, respectively). The frequency of p53 Arg homozygosity in high risk (HR)-HPV E6-positive cervical squamous cancer samples (64.06%) is much higher than that in (HR)-HPV E6-negative cervical squamous cancer samples (35.29%) and in HR-HPV E6-positive normal samples (33.33%). No difference of p53 codon 72 polymorphism was found according to FIGO staging and grades. In conclusion, based on the findings of this study, it is suggested that p53 Arg homozygosity could act as a potential risk factor for the tumorigenesis of the cervix. p53 codon 72 polymorphism has no relation with the FIGO staging and grades of cervical cancer. p53 Arg homozygosity and HR-HPV E6 positive simultaneously can predict the fate of cervical lesions.


Microbiology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark van Duin ◽  
Peter J. F. Snijders ◽  
Mireille T. M. Vossen ◽  
Erik Klaassen ◽  
Feja Voorhorst ◽  
...  

This study aimed to assess the role of specific human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) variants, in combination with p53 codon 72 polymorphism genotypes, in cervical carcinogenesis. An initial sequence analysis of HPV-16 long control, E6 and E7 regions of 53 well-defined cervical samples containing HPV-16 revealed that a T to G transition at nucleotide position 350 within the E6 open reading frame was the most common variation, the frequency of which seemed to decrease with increasing severity of the lesion. Therefore, a total of 246 cervical samples of residents of The Netherlands was specifically analysed for HPV-16 350G/T variants and/or p53 codon 72 genotypes. These comprised HPV-negative normal cervical scrapes (n=40), normal cervical scrapes containing HPV-16 (n=46), scrapes containing HPV-16 from women with abnormal cervical cytology participating in a non-intervention follow-up study without (n=38) and with (n=51) a histologically proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III lesion at the end of the study, and cervical squamous cell carcinomas (n=71). Neither specific HPV-16 350G/T variants nor specific p53 genotypes were associated with a higher risk of developing CIN III or cervical cancer. However, HPV-16 350T variants were significantly over-represented in p53 Arg homozygous women with cervical cancer. This suggests that, in p53 Arg/Arg women, infection with HPV-16 350T variants confers a higher risk of cervical cancer.


2004 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 374-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
S BRENNA ◽  
I SILVA ◽  
L ZEFERINO ◽  
J PEREIRA ◽  
E MARTINEZ ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Mulherkar ◽  
Akanksha Bansal ◽  
Poulami Das ◽  
Sadhana Kannan ◽  
Umesh Mahantshetty

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document