scholarly journals Analysis and classification of DNA‐binding sites in single‐stranded and double‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins using protein information

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 176-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Juan Liu ◽  
Yi Xiong ◽  
Lida Zhu ◽  
Xionghui zhou
Author(s):  
Omar Barukab ◽  
Farman Ali ◽  
Sher Afzal Khan

DNA-binding proteins (DBPs) perform an influential role in diverse biological activities like DNA replication, slicing, repair, and transcription. Some DBPs are indispensable for understanding many types of human cancers (i.e. lung, breast, and liver cancer) and chronic diseases (i.e. AIDS/HIV, asthma), while other kinds are involved in antibiotics, steroids, and anti-inflammatory drugs designing. These crucial processes are closely related to DBPs types. DBPs are categorized into single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (ssDBPs) and double-stranded DNA-binding proteins (dsDBPs). Few computational predictors have been reported for discriminating ssDBPs and dsDBPs. However, due to the limitations of the existing methods, an intelligent computational system is still highly desirable. In this work, features from protein sequences are discovered by extending the notion of dipeptide composition (DPC), evolutionary difference formula (EDF), and K-separated bigram (KSB) into the position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM). The highly intrinsic information was encoded by a compression approach named discrete cosine transform (DCT) and the model was trained with support vector machine (SVM). The prediction performance was further boosted by the genetic algorithm (GA) ensemble strategy. The novel predictor (DBP-GAPred) acquired 1.89%, 0.28%, and 6.63% higher accuracies on jackknife, 10-fold, and independent dataset tests, respectively than the best predictor. These outcomes confirm the superiority of our method over the existing predictors.


2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. e8-e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jue Zeng ◽  
Jizhou Yan ◽  
Ting Wang ◽  
Deborah Mosbrook-Davis ◽  
Kyle T. Dolan ◽  
...  

Biochemistry ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 932-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle Delagoutte ◽  
Amélie Heneman-Masurel ◽  
Giuseppe Baldacci

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Brickner

Eukaryotic genomes are spatially organized within the nucleus by chromosome folding, interchromosomal contacts, and interaction with nuclear structures. This spatial organization is observed in diverse organisms and both reflects and contributes to gene expression and differentiation. This leads to the notion that the arrangement of the genome within the nucleus has been shaped and conserved through evolutionary processes and likely plays an adaptive function. Both DNA-binding proteins and changes in chromatin structure influence the positioning of genes and larger domains within the nucleus. This suggests that the spatial organization of the genome can be genetically encoded by binding sites for DNA-binding proteins and can also involve changes in chromatin structure, potentially through nongenetic mechanisms. Here I briefly discuss the results that support these ideas and their implications for how genomes encode spatial organization.


2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (14) ◽  
pp. 3826-3831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payal Ray ◽  
Sandip De ◽  
Apratim Mitra ◽  
Karel Bezstarosti ◽  
Jeroen A. A. Demmers ◽  
...  

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are responsible for maintaining the silenced transcriptional state of many developmentally regulated genes. PcG proteins are organized into multiprotein complexes that are recruited to DNA via cis-acting elements known as “Polycomb response elements” (PREs). In Drosophila, PREs consist of binding sites for many different DNA-binding proteins, some known and others unknown. Identification of these DNA-binding proteins is crucial to understanding the mechanism of PcG recruitment to PREs. We report here the identification of Combgap (Cg), a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that is involved in recruitment of PcG proteins. Cg can bind directly to PREs via GTGT motifs and colocalizes with the PcG proteins Pleiohomeotic (Pho) and Polyhomeotic (Ph) at the majority of PREs in the genome. In addition, Cg colocalizes with Ph at a number of targets independent of Pho. Loss of Cg leads to decreased recruitment of Ph at only a subset of sites; some of these sites are binding sites for other Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) components, others are not. Our data suggest that Cg can recruit Ph in the absence of PRC1 and illustrate the diversity and redundancy of PcG protein recruitment mechanisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document