A cephalometric study of the relationship between the level of velopharyngeal closure and the palatal plane in patients with repaired cleft palate and controls without clefts

1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 486-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Satoh ◽  
T. Wada ◽  
T. Tachimura ◽  
S. Sakoda ◽  
R. Shiba
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Velopharyngeal Closure ◽  
Cephalometric Study ◽  
The Relationship

Changes in the Height of Velopharyngeal Closure Relative to the Cervical Spine From Infancy Through Adolescence in Patients With Cleft Palate

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 508-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazlin N. Mason ◽  
John E. Riski ◽  
Jamie L. Perry
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Velopharyngeal Closure ◽  
Sectional Analysis ◽  
The Relationship

Objective: Palpation is often used to identify C1, an intraoperative landmark, for placement of the pharyngoplasty. However, little is known about the relationship between the palatal plane (PP) and this cervical spine landmark across select variables. This study seeks to analyze variations in the height of velopharyngeal closure relative to C1 across differing cleft types and age groups. Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. Setting: Large, multidisciplinary center for craniofacial disorders. Methods: Clinical lateral cephalograms were analyzed in nonsyndromic patients who underwent primary palatoplasty. Regression analysis and analysis of covariance were completed to determine how age and cleft type impact underlying cervical and velopharyngeal measures. Results: Age ( P < .001) and cleft type ( P = .036) were significant predictors of the distance between the height of velopharyngeal closure and C1. Those with greater severity of clefting demonstrated larger distances between the height of velopharyngeal closure and C1. Compared to normative data, children with cleft palate have significantly larger distances between the PP and C1. The height of velopharyngeal closure above C1 was observed to range from 3.6 to 12.6 mm across cleft populations. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the variability in C1 as a landmark across variables including cleft type and age. Because of differences in the height of velopharyngeal closure across cleft types relative to C1, it is necessary to preoperatively quantify the vertical distance between the PP and palpable intraoperative landmark, C1, to determine the appropriate height of pharyngoplasty insertion.

Perceptual Evaluation of Speech and Velopharyngeal Function in Children with and without Cleft Palate and the Relationship to Nasal Airflow Patterns

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Dotevall ◽  
Anette Lohmander-Agerskov ◽  
Hasse Ejnell ◽  
Björn Bake
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Airflow Rate ◽  
Nasal Airflow ◽  
Perceptual Evaluation ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function ◽  
The Relationship

Objectives The aim was to study the relationship between perceptual evaluation of speech variables related to velopharyngeal function and the pattern of nasal airflow during the velopharyngeal closing phase in speech in children with and without cleft palate. Participants Fourteen children with cleft lip and palate or cleft palate only and 15 controls aged 7 and 10 years. All were native Swedish speakers. Method Three experienced listeners performed a blinded perceptual speech evaluation. Nasal airflow was transduced with a pneumotachograph attached to a nasal mask. The duration from peak to 5% nasal airflow, maximum flow declination rate, and nasal airflow at selected points in time during the transition from nasal to stop consonants in bilabial and velar articulatory positions in sentences were estimated. The analysis was focused on the perceptual ratings of “velopharyngeal function” and “hypernasality.” Results A strong association was found between ratings of “velopharyngeal function” and “hypernasality” and the pattern of nasal airflow during the bilabial nasal-to-stop combination /mp/. Both the sensitivity and specificity were 1.00 for the bilabial temporal airflow measure in relation to ratings of “velopharyngeal function.” The nasal airflow rate during /p/ in /mp/ had a sensitivity of 1.00 and specificity of 0.92 to 0.96 in relation to ratings of “hypernasality.” Conclusion Assessment of the nasal airflow dynamics during the velopharyngeal closing phase in speech presents quantitative, objective data that appear to distinguish between perceptually normal and deviant velopharyngeal function with high sensitivity and specificity.

Change in Levator Veli Palatini Muscle Activity for Patients with Cleft Palate in Association with Placement of a Speech-Aid Prosthesis

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 503-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Tachimura ◽  
Kanji Nohara ◽  
Yoshinori Fujita ◽  
Takeshi Wada
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Pressure Change ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Reserve Capacity ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Levator Veli Palatini ◽  
Velopharyngeal Incompetence ◽  
Velopharyngeal Closure ◽  
The Mean

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine whether a speech-aid prosthesis normalizes the activity of the levator veli palatini muscle for patients with cleft palate who exhibit velopharyngeal incompetence. Design: Each subject was instructed to produce repetitions of /mu/, /u/, /pu/, /su/, and /tsu/ and to blow with maximum possible effort. Electromyographic (EMG) activity of the levator veli palatini muscle was recorded with and without a hybrid speech-aid prosthesis in place. Participants: The participants were five patients with repaired cleft palate who were routinely wearing a hybrid speech-aid prosthesis. Results: With the prosthesis in place, the mean value of levator activity changed positively in relation to oral air-pressure change during blowing. Differences in levator activity in relation to speech samples were similar to those in normal speakers. With the prosthesis in place, levator activity for speech tasks was less than 50% of the maximum levator activity for all subjects. The findings were similar to those reported previously for normal speakers. Conclusion: Placement of the prosthesis changed EMG activity levels of the levator veli palatini muscle to levels that are similar to normal speakers. It is possible that, with the increase in the differential levator activity between speech and a maximum force task, the velopharyngeal mechanism has a greater reserve capacity to maintain velopharyngeal closure compared with the noprosthesis condition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document