scholarly journals EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling in autoimmune pancreatitis: Is needle tip design more important than needle size?

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (12) ◽  
pp. E1862-E1864
Author(s):  
Per Hedenström ◽  
Björn Lindkvist
Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 978-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Ishikawa ◽  
Hiroki Kawashima ◽  
Eizaburo Ohno ◽  
Hiroki Suhara ◽  
Daijuro Hayashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Detailed histological evaluation is important in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). However, it remains challenging to obtain adequate tissue from the pancreas. Recently, several reports have suggested the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) using the new “core” needles for acquiring pancreatic tissue. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of EUS-FNB for diagnosing AIP with one such needle, a 22-gauge Franseen needle. Methods Patients who met the imaging diagnostic criteria for AIP based on the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent EUS-FNB with a 22-gauge Franseen needle. Histological findings were evaluated based on the ICDC, and the detection rates of level 1 and level 1 or 2 histology were calculated. Results 56 patients from 11 different institutions were enrolled in the final analysis (55 suspected to have type 1 AIP and one with type 2 AIP). Lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, obliterative phlebitis, storiform fibrosis, and > 10 IgG4-positive cells per high-power field were detected in 55 (100 %), 24 (43.6 %), 40 (72.7 %), and 36 (65.5 %) of the 55 patients, respectively. The detection rates of level 1 and level 1 or 2 histology for AIP were 58.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 44.1 % – 71.3 %) and 92.7 % (95 %CI 82.4 % – 98.0 %), respectively, which were apparently higher than our historical results (7.9 % [95 %CI 1.7 % – 21.4 %] and 62.2 % [95 %CI 46.5 % – 76.2 %], respectively) using a conventional needle. Conclusions EUS-FNB with a 22-gauge Franseen needle demonstrated favorable detection rates which would be clinically beneficial for the histological diagnosis of AIP.


2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 562-563
Author(s):  
Victor L. Fox ◽  
Jessica Yasuda ◽  
Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi ◽  
John R. Saltzman

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (12) ◽  
pp. E1855-E1861
Author(s):  
Kofi W. Oppong ◽  
Pardeep Maheshwari ◽  
Manu K. Nayar ◽  
Antony Darne ◽  
Daniel Parkinson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) performs poorly in the histological diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). The aim of this study was to assess the performance of fine-needle biopsy (FNB) comparing reverse bevel (RB) and fork-tip (FT) needles. Patients and methods A retrospective study of prospectively maintained databases was performed. Patients with a final diagnosis of type 1 AIP who underwent EUS-FNB during diagnostic workup were included. Pathology reports were reviewed and classified as per international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC). The Primary outcome was EUS-FNB sensitivity in diagnosing type 1 AIP. Results Between March 2011 and December 2018, 24 patients with a final diagnosis of type 1 AIP underwent FNB. Six patients underwent biopsy with the RB needle and 18 with the FT needle. Mean age (± SD) 62.2 (± 11.4), 17 (70.8 %) male. No RB samples were diagnostic compared to 14 (78 %) FT; P = 0.001; of which 13 (72 %) were level 1. In eight (44 %) of FT cases a diagnosis was not possible without histology. Initial biopsy was diagnostic in five (62.5 %) of these cases. Including repeat biopsy, seven (87 %) had a diagnosis made by FT needle. Obliterative phlebitis (44 %) was the least frequently identified pathological feature and immunoglobulin (IgG)4 + plasma cells > 10 per high power field (78 %) the most common. Conclusion The FT needle demonstrated good performance for diagnosing type 1 AIP. The results support the preferential use of this core biopsy needle for EUS pancreatic tissue sampling.


Gut ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 912-912
Author(s):  
F Mutch

OTO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 2473974X2110137
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Shumrick ◽  
Jonathan C. Simmonds ◽  
Lorna L. Ogden ◽  
Cindi A. Snowden ◽  
Jagdish K. Dhingra

Objective To compare diagnostic capability and patient pain between 25-gauge (25G) and 27G needles for ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of thyroid nodules. Study Design Prospective blinded randomized trial. Setting Thyroid clinic in otolaryngology practice in a community. Methods A prospective randomized blinded trial was conducted on 148 thyroid nodules in 107 patients undergoing ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy. Needle gauge was randomized to individual nodule. Patients were blinded to the needle size used. All specimens were assessed via the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology and assigned a morphologic quantitative score based on number of thyroid cells and lymphocytes, amount of colloid, and degree of blood/fibrin artifact in each sample. Patient pain experience was scored. A chi-square test was used to compare nondiagnostic rates, and differences in cytologic morphology and pain scores were compared with 2-sample Student t tests. Results Of the 148 nodules, 77 were biopsied with 25G needles and 71 with 27G needles. Twenty-five percent (19/77) of the samples obtained with 25G needles yielded a nondiagnostic cytology result (Bethesda category 1) as compared with 11% (8/70) in the 27G group ( P = .0282; 95% CI, 1.47%-25.97%). On average, samples from 25G needles had a higher blood/fibrin quantitative score ( P = .043; 95% CI, −0.64 to −0.010). There were no differences in pain between groups. Conclusion Use of a 27G needle for fine-needle biopsies is not only safe and feasible but desirable and highly recommended, as it yields better diagnostic information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document