15 Spine metastasesminimally invasive surgical (MIS) approachesMinimally invasive surgical (MIS) approachesPostoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

2015 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical

scholarly journals Minimally invasive techniques for epilepsy surgery: stereotactic radiosurgery and other technologies

2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (Suppl_2) ◽  
pp. 232-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Quigg ◽  
Cynthia Harden
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Epilepsy Surgery ◽  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Intractable Epilepsy ◽  
Patient Acceptance ◽  
Minimally Invasive Techniques ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Invasive Techniques

Minimally invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of medically intractable epilepsy, which have been developed by neurosurgeons and epileptologists almost simultaneously with standard open epilepsy surgery, provide benefits in the traditional realms of safety and efficacy and the more recently appreciated realms of patient acceptance and costs. In this review, the authors discuss the shortcomings of the gold standard of open epilepsy surgery and summarize the techniques developed to provide minimally invasive alternatives. These minimally invasive techniques include stereotactic radiosurgery using the Gamma Knife, stereotactic radiofrequency thermocoagulation, laser-induced thermal therapy, and MRI-guided focused ultrasound ablation.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques to Treat Spine Infection S

1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry M. Parker ◽  
Paul C. McAfee ◽  
Ira L. Fedder ◽  
James C. Weis ◽  
W. Peter Geis
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Spine Infection ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical

Minimally Invasive Circumferential Spinal Decompression and Stabilization for Symptomatic Metastatic Spine Tumor

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. E620-E622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Taghva ◽  
Khan W. Li ◽  
John C. Liu ◽  
Ziya L. Gokaslan ◽  
Patrick C. Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Spinal Cord Compression ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cord Compression ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Lower Extremity Weakness ◽  
Hardware Failure ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Potential Benefits

Abstract OBJECTIVE Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression is a potentially devastating complication of cancer and is estimated to occur in 5% to 14% of all cancer patients. It is best treated surgically. Minimally invasive spine surgery has the potential benefits of decreased surgical approach–related morbidity, blood loss, hospital stay, and time to mobilization. CLINICAL PRESENTATION A 36-year-old man presented with worsening back pain and lower extremity weakness. Workup revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung with spinal cord compression at T4 and T5. INTERVENTION AND TECHNIQUE T4 and T5 vertebrectomy with expandable cage placement and T1–T8 pedicle screw fixation and fusion were performed using minimally invasive surgical techniques. RESULT The patient improved neurologically and was ambulatory on postoperative day 1. At the 9-month follow-up point, he remained neurologically intact and pain free, and there was no evidence of hardware failure. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive surgical circumferential decompression may be a viable option for the treatment of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

scholarly journals Cement leakage: safety of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment of multiple myeloma vertebral lesions

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Andrea La Maida ◽  
Laura Serena Giarratana ◽  
Alberto Acerbi ◽  
Valentina Ferrari ◽  
Giuseppe Vincenzo Mineo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cement Leakage ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical

Minimally Invasive Resection of Benign Gastric Tumors in Challenging Locations: Prepyloric Region or Gastroesophageal Junction

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 968-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Armstrong ◽  
Alana Gebhart ◽  
Brian R. Smith ◽  
Ninh T. Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Wedge Resection ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Anatomic Resection ◽  
Submucosal Tumors ◽  
Gastric Tumors ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical

Benign gastric tumors in a prepyloric location or within 3 cm adjacent of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) are often challenging to resect using minimally invasive surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive enucleation or resection of benign gastric tumors at these difficult locations. The charts of patients undergoing minimally invasive resection of benign-appearing submucosal gastric tumors between June 2001 and December 2012 were reviewed. Data on tumor size and location, type of minimally invasive surgical resection, perioperative complications, 90-day mortality, pathology, and recurrence were collected. A total of 70 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic resection of benign-appearing submucosal gastric tumors; there were 24 patients with lesions close to the GEJ and nine patients with lesions close to the prepyloric region. All lesions were successfully resected laparoscopically. For prepyloric tumors, surgical approaches included enucleation (n = 1), wedge resection (n = 2), and distal gastrectomy with reconstruction (n = 6). For tumors close to the GEJ, surgical approaches included enucleation (n = 16), wedge resection (n = 3), and esophagogastrectomy (n = 5). Complications in this series of 33 patients included late strictures requiring endoscopic dilation in three patients who underwent esophagogastrectomy. The 90-day mortality rate was zero. There were no recurrences over a mean follow-up of 15 months (range, 1 to 86 months). Minimally invasive enucleation or formal anatomic resection of submucosal tumors located adjacent to the GEJ or at the prepyloric region is safe and carries a low risk for tumor recurrence. Submucosal gastric lesions adjacent to the GEJ are amenable to laparoscopic enucleation or wedge resection unless they extend proximally into the esophagus. Prepyloric lesions often require formal anatomic resection with reconstruction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document