A case of valve prosthesis embolization to the aorta during the transapical implantation procedure: Intraoperative management

2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Dashkevich ◽  
S Sorg ◽  
M Siepe ◽  
F Beyersdorf ◽  
C Schlensak
2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Böning ◽  
S Haberer ◽  
UP Rosendahl ◽  
I Florath ◽  
JC Ennker

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Photiadis ◽  
M. Musci ◽  
O. Miera ◽  
S. Ovroutski ◽  
A. Mekkawy ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Link ◽  
K. Buschmann ◽  
L. Conzelmann ◽  
M. Youssef ◽  
A. Abugameh ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lior Gonen ◽  
Eytan Nov ◽  
Nir Shimony ◽  
Ben Shofty ◽  
Georgios Klironomos ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Shahzeb Khan ◽  
Faizan Imran Bawany ◽  
Asadullah Khan ◽  
Mehwish Hussain

<p><b>Background:</b> Small aortic prosthesis can lead to prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). Implanting such small prosthesis remains a controversial issue. This study was done to investigate whether or not PPM causes an increased operative mortality in aortic valve replacement (AVR).</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Two-hundred-two consecutive patients undergoing primary AVR in a tertiary hospital were included. The sample was grouped according to the aortic valve prosthesis size: ?21 mm (small) and >21 mm (standard). The effect of variables on outcomes was determined by univariate and multivariable regression analyses.</p><p><b>Results:</b> PPM was found significantly more among patients with AVR ? 21mm (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Moreover, the likelihood of mortality also was significantly higher in these patients (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Univariate analysis demonstrated small prosthesis size, urgent operation, PPM, female gender, and NYHA Class IV as significant predictors of mortality. Multivariate regression identified female gender, PPM, and urgent operation as the key independent predictors of mortality.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> PPM and female gender are significant predictors of mortality. Care should be taken to prevent PPM by implanting larger prosthesis especially in females.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e44
Author(s):  
E. Mikus ◽  
M. Pagliaro ◽  
S. Calvi ◽  
M. Panzavolta ◽  
E. Ramoni ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
Quang Thuu Le

Objective: Today, despite many recent improvements in intraoperative management and postoperative care, late pericardial effusions remain an important cause of morbidity after cardiac surgery. Because of widespread use of chronic anticoagulation and increased complexity of operations, the incidence of effusion may be higher. Thus we need to update the information on the symptoms, risk factors, diagnostic methods and treatment of Postoperative pericardial effusion syndrome. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional and prospective study of all patients admitted to hospital because of pericardial effusion after open heart surgery from 1/2010 to 9/2012. Study the clinical characteristics, paraclinicals, evaluate the results of treatment of pericardial effusion after open heart surgery. Results: Symptoms of pericardial effusion are nonspecific. Some patients with pericardial effusion report minimal problems. In the present study, few patients have the classic presentation of tamponade. Echocardiography is the diagnostic accuracy pericardial effusion after open heart surgery. This treatment mainly is pericardial drainage with 100%. Conclusion: Pericardial effusion is a common complication after open-heart surgery, symptoms of pericardial effusion are nonspecific to diagnostic method is echocardiographic surveillance.patients can be treated with internal medicine if has no tamponade and less fliuds. Pericardial drainage is absolute only in patients with pericardial effusion with signs of cardiac tamponade or pericardial many of effusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document