Die OSCAR-Endo-Studie: One Stop Clinic Assessment of Risk for endometrial hyperplasie and cancer: ein „fast-track“ Protokoll zur Abklärung von Endometriumpathologien

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Hirtl-Görgl ◽  
C Natter ◽  
F Roithmeier ◽  
V Unterrichter ◽  
F Moinfar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
SA Johnson ◽  
Y Kalairajah ◽  
P Moonot ◽  
N Steele ◽  
RE Field

INTRODUCTION The fast-track assessment clinic (FTAC) is a process to select patients who are very likely to require primary total hip replacement. Selected patients can then be seen in a one-off clinic reducing the number of hospital visits, cost to primary care trusts and delay between referral and treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty patients on the waiting list for hip replacement were analysed to see if there were common parameters that led to their inclusion. From these data, fast-track selection criteria (FTSCs) were generated. These FTSCs were used to make a dual comparison of outcomes between 52 patients seen in a traditional clinic. Finally, a pilot study was conducted in which patients fulfilling FTSCs were seen in a designated clinic. RESULTS An Oxford hip score (OHS) of 34 and above combined with severe loss of joint space, severe marginal osteophytes, or both was common to most patients on the waiting list (84%). FTSCs correctly predicted the outcome of the orthopaedic clinic in 38 patients out of a total of 52. During the pilot stage, positive FTSCs were shown to have a positive predictive value of 92% for joint replacement being carried out and a negative predictive value of 46%. CONCLUSIONS An OHS of 34 or above combined with complete loss of joint space and/or severe marginal osteophyte formation can be used to select patients who are very likely to need total hip replacement. These patients can be seen in a clinic that combines assessment of surgical indication with medical fitness for surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 295 (4) ◽  
pp. 959-964
Author(s):  
Katrin Hefler-Frischmuth ◽  
Elisabeth Hirtl-Goergl ◽  
Verena Unterrichter ◽  
Judith Lafleur ◽  
Gudrun Brunnmayr-Petkin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 578-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Hadjiminas ◽  
KE Zacharioudakis ◽  
MK Tasoulis ◽  
JCC Hu ◽  
S Lanitis ◽  
...  

Introduction Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges as it produces subtle radiological changes. It has been suggested that it is not suitable for breast conserving surgery (BCS). The aim of this study was to ascertain the diagnostic adequacy of modern mammography and ultrasonography in the context of a fast track symptomatic diagnostic clinic in the UK. It also sought to compare the mastectomy, re-excision and BCS rates for ILC with those for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was carried out on all new symptomatic cancers presenting to the one-stop diagnostic clinic of a single breast unit between 1998 and 2007. Results Compared with IDC, ILC was significantly larger at presentation (46mm vs 25mm), needed re-excision after BCS more often (38.8% vs 22.3%) and required mastectomy more frequently (58.8% vs 40.8%). Although mammography performs poorly in diagnosing ILC compared with IDC, when combined with ultrasonography, sensitivity of the combined imaging was not significantly different between these two histological types. Conclusions Provided ultrasonography is performed, standard radiological imaging is adequate for initial diagnosis of symptomatically presenting ILC but some additional preoperative workup should clearly be employed to reduce the higher number of reoperations for this histological type.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document