scholarly journals Performing the Brain Death Examination and the Declaration of Pediatric Brain Death

2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 229-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Porter ◽  
Susan Martin

AbstractDeclaration of brain death is a clinical diagnosis made by the absence of neurological function in a comatose patient secondary to a known irreversible cause. Brain death determination is not an infrequent process in pediatric intensive care units. It is important that pediatric intensive care providers understand the definition of brain death and intensivists are able to implement brain death testing. The following is a narration detailing the process of brain death determination by physical examination. First, the prerequisites that determine patients' eligibility for brain death testing will be outlined. Next, each part of the physical exam, including the apnea test, will be described in detail. Finally, how the declaration of brain death is made is stated. In addition, special considerations and ancillary testing will be briefly highlighted.

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 975-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariane Lewis ◽  
Nellie Adams ◽  
Arun Chopra ◽  
Matthew P. Kirschen

Although pediatric brain death guidelines stipulate when ancillary testing should be used during brain death determination, little is known about the way these recommendations are implemented in clinical practice. We conducted a survey of pediatric intensivists and neurologists in the United States on the use of ancillary testing. Although most respondents noted they only performed an ancillary test if the clinical examination and apnea test could not be completed, 20% of 195 respondents performed an ancillary test for other reasons, including (1) to convince a family that objected to the brain death determination that a patient is truly dead (n = 21), (2) personal preference (n = 14), and (3) institutional requirement (n = 5). Our findings suggest that pediatricians use ancillary tests for a variety of reasons during brain death determination. Medical societies and governmental regulatory bodies must reinforce the need for homogeneity in practice.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Ni ◽  
Jianting Cao ◽  
Rubin Wang

To give a more definite criterion using electroencephalograph (EEG) approach on brain death determination is vital for both reducing the risks and preventing medical misdiagnosis. This paper presents several novel adaptive computable entropy methods based on approximate entropy (ApEn) and sample entropy (SampEn) to monitor the varying symptoms of patients and to determine the brain death. The proposed method is a dynamic extension of the standard ApEn and SampEn by introducing a shifted time window. The main advantages of the developed dynamic approximate entropy (DApEn) and dynamic sample entropy (DSampEn) are for real-time computation and practical use. Results from the analysis of 35 patients (63 recordings) show that the proposed methods can illustrate effectiveness and well performance in evaluating the brain consciousness states.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Migdady ◽  
Moein Amin ◽  
Aaron Shoskes ◽  
Catherine Hassett ◽  
Sung-Min Cho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Persistent apnea despite an adequate rise in arterial pressure of CO2 is an essential component of the criteria for brain death (BD) determination. Current guidelines vary regarding the utility of arterial pH changes during the apnea test (AT). We aimed to study the effect of incorporating an arterial pH target < 7.30 during the AT (in addition to the existing PaCO2 threshold) on brain death declarations. Methods We performed retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients who were diagnosed with BD and underwent AT at the Cleveland Clinic over the last 10 years. Data regarding baseline and post-AT blood gas analyses were collected and analyzed. Results Ninety-eight patients underwent AT in the study period, which was positive in 89 (91%) and inconclusive in 9 (9%) patients. The mean age was 50 years old (standard deviation [SD] 16) and 54 (55%) were female. The most common etiology BD was hypoxic ischemic brain injury (HIBI) due to cardiac arrest (42%). Compared to those with positive AT, patients with inconclusive AT had a higher post-AT pH (7.24 vs 7.17, p = 0.01), lower PaO2 (47 vs 145, p < 0.01), and a lower PaCO2 (55 vs 73, p = 0.01). Among patients with a positive AT using PaCO2 threshold alone, the frequency of patients with post-AT pH < 7.30 was 95% (83/87). Conclusion Implementing a BD criteria requiring both arterial pH and PaCO2 thresholds reduced the total number of positive ATs; these inconclusive cases would have required longer duration of AT to reach both targets, repeated ATs, or ancillary studies to confirm BD. The impact of this on the overall number BD declarations requires further research.


2018 ◽  
pp. 276-285
Author(s):  
Hilary H. Wang ◽  
David M. Greer

This chapter reviews the history of brain death determination, current guidelines for performing the brain death examination including the apnea test, details of apnea testing, the role of brain dead donors in organ donation, physiologic changes seen in brain dead patients, and the relevant challenges in intensive care unit management of such patients for donor organ optimization. The goal of this chapter is to provide clear guidance for a critical care provider to perform an accurate and thorough brain death examination and to further the reader’s understanding of the historical and legal context surrounding brain death and organ donation in the United States.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 988-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mathur ◽  
L. Petersen ◽  
M. Stadtler ◽  
C. Rose ◽  
J. C. Ejike ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 368-368
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Migdady ◽  
Moein Amin ◽  
Aaron Shoskes ◽  
Catherine Hassett ◽  
Sung-Min Cho ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 411-411
Author(s):  
Conrad Krawiec ◽  
Mohan Mysore ◽  
Mudit Mathur ◽  
Xinying Fang ◽  
Shou Zhou ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 676-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Hansen ◽  
Ari R. Joffe

A patient who has been declared brain dead is considered to be both legally and clinically dead. However, we report 2 pediatric cases in which the patients demonstrated clinical signs of brain stem function that are not recognized or tested in current Canadian or US guidelines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document