scholarly journals First experience with an active bone conduction implant system fixed by selfdrilling screws

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assen Koitschev ◽  
Nadine Berger ◽  
Antje Ulmer ◽  
Peter Amrhein ◽  
Christiane Koitschev
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Koitschev ◽  
N Berger ◽  
A Ulmer ◽  
P Amrhein ◽  
C Koitschev

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 956-963
Author(s):  
Se-Joon Oh ◽  
Eui-Kyung Goh ◽  
Sung-Won Choi ◽  
Seokhwan Lee ◽  
Hyun-Min Lee ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1132-1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Håkansson ◽  
Måns Eeg-Olofsson ◽  
Sabine Reinfeldt ◽  
Stefan Stenfelt ◽  
Gösta Granström

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Kerstin Willenborg ◽  
Emilio Avallone ◽  
Hannes Maier ◽  
Thomas Lenarz ◽  
Susan Busch

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> The Cochlear™ Osia® System (Osia) is an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant system intended for patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss but can also be used in cases of single-sided deafness (SSD) for the contralateral routing of signal (CROS). The Osia implant is placed subcutaneously under the intact skin behind the ear with the piezoelectric actuator connected to an osseointegrated BI300 implant – a titanium screw used for a 2-stage Baha surgery – on the mastoid. The external processor is magnetically attached to the subcutaneous implant receiver coil. As the Osia has recently been CE certified and is new on the market, with limited patient outcome data for SSD available, the objective of this study was the evaluation of surgical procedure, audiological results, and patient satisfaction for the Osia in SSD patients. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> In a prospective, monocentric clinical observation study, 6 patients (18 years of age or older) with SSD and bone conduction thresholds pure tone average 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz ≤25 dB HL on the contralateral side were implanted with an Osia. Analysis of clinical outcome data with respect to surgical technique, adverse events, audiological measurement, and subjective benefit for SSD patients was conducted. Audiological measurements performed included hearing thresholds, sound field thresholds, word recognition scores (WRS; in %) in quiet, and speech recognition thresholds in noise (in dB SNR). All tests were performed unaided and aided with the Osia. The subjective benefit with the Osia was determined by using 2 questionnaires; the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSSD). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Preliminary results indicate a straightforward surgical procedure with a low rate of complications and an improvement in speech perception in quiet, listening performance in everyday situations and patient satisfaction. However, in one of 6 subjects, a revision surgery had to be performed. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Provided that SSD patients are open for CROS hearing, they can benefit from the Osia by reduced head shadow effects and better speech recognition. Special caution should be given to the skin at the site of implantation to avoid complications.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Sprinzl ◽  
Thomas Lenarz ◽  
Rudolf Hagen ◽  
Wolf Dieter Baumgartner ◽  
Thomas Keintzel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document