scholarly journals The Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Patients with Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia

Author(s):  
Man-Chiu Poon

AbstractPlatelet transfusion is the standard treatment to control or prevent bleeding in patients with Glanzmann's thrombasthenia (GT), but platelets are often unavailable. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is an effective alternative to platelets in patients with GT with past/present refractoriness to platelet transfusions and antibodies to platelets. However, there is an unmet need for an alternative to platelets in patients without antibodies. This report summarizes evidence of efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in patients with GT without refractoriness or antibodies to platelets from three different sources: the Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia Registry (GTR), published literature (January 01, 1999 to December 01, 2017), and the Novo Nordisk safety surveillance database. In the GTR, 133 patients received rFVIIa for the treatment of 333 bleeding episodes and prevention of bleeding in 157 surgical procedures. Overall efficacy rates were 79 and 88%, respectively, in patients treated for bleeding episodes or for the prevention of bleeding during surgery; effectiveness was generally similar across refractoriness/antibody status categories. Median dose per infusion of rFVIIa was close to that recommended for patients with GT (90 µg/kg). Data from 14 published case reports also demonstrated that rFVIIa is effective with an acceptable safety profile in patients with GT without antibodies to platelets. Analysis of adverse events reported in GTR and in Novo Nordisk safety surveillance database did not raise any new safety concerns. These data supported the label extension of rFVIIa to include cases where platelets are not readily available, which was approved by the European Medicines Agency in December 2018.

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (06) ◽  
pp. 1027-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Zaffanello ◽  
Dino Veneri ◽  
Massimo Franchini

SummaryRecombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa, Novo Seven®) has been successfully used to treat bleeding episodes in patients with antibodies against coagulation factors VIII and IX. In recent years, rFVIIa has also been employed for the management of uncontrolled bleeding in a number of congenital and acquired haemos- tatic abnormalities. Based on a literature search, this review examines the current knowledge on therapy with rFVIIa, from the now well-standardized uses to the newer and less well-characterised clinical applications.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5539-5539
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Stephens ◽  
Marc F. Botteman ◽  
Ashish V. Joshi ◽  
Michael Sumner

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Severe hemophilia with inhibitors is a rare disease with substantial clinical, humanistic, and economic consequences. Within the past few years, a number of formal economic analyses have emerged which examined the cost of treating bleeding episodes with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) versus plasma-derived agents. Thus the objective was to review the recent health economic analyses of rFVIIa in the management of patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. DATA SOURCES: Published, English-language medical literature on the economics of rFVIIa was searched from January 1996 through July 2006 using: the MEDLINE/PubMed database, PubMed related articles feature, company knowledge of published medical literature for rFVIIa that was not indexed by MEDLINE/PubMed, and a thorough review of retrieved article bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA ABSTRACTION: Abstracts selected for full article retrieval/review were those that specifically mentioned (or implied that the full article would address) cost impact, cost of treatment, or cost-effectiveness for rFVIIa in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. Of 70 abstracts reviewed, 30 articles were selected for retrieval, and from those, thirteen economic analyses (6 burden of illness and 7 comparative studies) met inclusion criteria for data abstraction and synthesis. Seventeen articles were excluded for the following reasons: reports of basic drug acquisition costs without formal economic analysis, single case reports, studies without inhibitor patients, or studies of immune tolerance therapy. DATA SYNTHESIS: The economic impact of rFVIIa on hospitals and treatment centers occurs primarily during hospitalization to manage major bleeding episodes and allow for elective orthopedic surgeries that would not have been attempted without availability of rFVIIa. Six out of seven comparative analyses for on-demand treatment suggest that total cost of treating a bleeding episode with rFVIIa may be lower than that of using plasma-based agents due to faster bleeding resolution, higher initial efficacy rates, and avoidance of second and third lines of treatment. Dosing assumptions for the various agents compared in the economic analyses were the most sensitive variables. CONCLUSIONS: The currently available literature suggests that rFVIIa is a cost-effective treatment option and may ultimately lead to improvement in clinical outcomes for patients with hemophilia and inhibitors.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2278-2278
Author(s):  
Charles T Nakar ◽  
David L. Cooper ◽  
Donna DiMichele

Abstract Patients with severe hemophilia are at risk for developing neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) in response to treatment with factor concentrates. Inhibitors develop in >30% of patients with factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency, in 3–6% of patients (pts) with factor IX (FIX) deficiency, and significantly increase the disease-related morbidity. Cranial hemorrhage is a serious bleeding complication in the presence of high titer inhibitors. Treatment strategies include bypassing agents such as activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). For rFVIIa, 90–120μg/kg every 2–3hr represents the standard initial dosing regimen, although higher doses have been studied. Despite its licensure in 1999 for treatment of hemophilia patients with inhibitors, little has been published on rFVIIa dosing and efficacy in such pts with cranial bleeding. To examine the US experience with this therapeutic challenge, we conducted a retrospective review of the HTRS 2004–2008 database that includes >5000 bleeding episodes in hemophilia inhibitor pts collected retrospectively from 2000 onwards. This analysis included congenital hemophilia inhibitor (CHI) pts treated at least partially with rFVIIa for “head” bleeds designated as either spontaneous or traumatic and either intra- (ICH) or extracranial (ECH). Each cranial hemorrhage was analyzed with respect to initial, initial 24 hour and total infused dose of FVIIa, total number of doses and days of therapy and investigator-assigned outcome. In all, 29 CHI pts with 56 cranial bleeding episodes met study criteria; 27 had FVIII and 2 had FIX deficiency. Mean ages (years) at spontaneous and traumatic bleeding were 12.2 and 3.7 respectively for FVIII pts; 16 and 1.5 respectively in FIX pts. Most cranial bleeds were traumatic (75%) and extracranial (80%). Importantly, 8/11 ICHs developed spontaneously while 39/45 ECHs were traumatic. In all, 51/56 cranial hemorrhages were treated exclusively with rFVIIa. In 4, therapy included a single aPCC dose. In 1 case, rFVIIa followed a 2 week course of FVIII, on which the pt developed an inhibitor. ICHs were treated with a mean of 58 infusions over 8.9 days (median: 23 infusions, 7 days); ECHs were treated with a mean of 6 infusions over 1.3 days (median: 1 infusion, 1 day) (p=.011). The mean/median initial infusion dose for all cranial bleeds were with 137/106μg/kg and varied little by location and nature of the hemorrhage. All ICHs were initially treated in hospital settings, while ⅔ of ECHs were initially treated at home. However, initial treatment setting did not impact initial dose. Interestingly, higher initial doses of rFVIIa were used to treat cranial hemorrhage through 2005 (mean 150 μg/kg; range 60–400 μg/kg) than were used from 2006–08 (103 μg/kg; range 80–170 μg/kg). The mean total dose/treatment course was 1,751 μg/kg (median: 240μg/kg, range 70–35,025μg/kg), but varied according to bleed location. As expected, pts with ICHs received higher total doses (mean: 7,279μg/kg; median of 2,250μg/kg) when compared with ECHs (mean: 400μg/kg; median of 140μg/kg 190μg/kg) (p=.06). Overall 78% of the total dose per treatment course was administered within the first 24 hours; however this differed between ICH (34% total/24 hrs) and ECH (88% total/24 hrs). All ECH was stopped effectively with rFVIIa; 44/45 bleeds were controlled within 24 hours (hrs) and in one hemostasis was achieved within 72 hrs. Twenty-seven episodes required a single treatment dose. Of the 11 ICH bleeds, 6 were reported to be controlled within 24 hrs; one within 72 hrs. Two pts required surgery to control hemostasis. In 2 cases, control of hemorrhage was not explicitly confirmed. One patient with spontaneous ICH died despite reported control of hemostasis. There were no serious adverse drug reactions associated with the rFVIIa treatment. In summary, in this retrospective review of the US experience accumulated between 2004 and 2008, standard dosing of rFVIIa was found to be safe and effective in the treatment of cranial hemorrhage with an efficacy rate of 100% for ECH and 82% for ICH. The limitations of this study include potential adverse outcome and complications underreporting. Furthermore, neurological and other morbidity data is unavailable. We advocate further prospective documentation of treatment and outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document