Early removal of biflanged metal stents in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a prospective study

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (06) ◽  
pp. 597-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay Dhir ◽  
Douglas Adler ◽  
Ankit Dalal ◽  
Nitin Aherrao ◽  
Rahul Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Early Removal ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stenting ◽  
Walled Off Necrosis

Abstract Background and study aims Dedicated stents placed under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance have shown promise for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). A long duration of stent placement may increase the risk of adverse events. We prospectively evaluated the effects of (i) early removal of biflanged metal stents (BFMSs) and (ii) additional stenting of the pancreatic duct with plastic stents in patients with ductal leaks, on the risk of WON recurrence. Patients and methods Symptomatic patients with pancreatic WON underwent EUS-guided BFMS placement, followed by necrosectomy, when required, from Day 3. A 5 Fr plastic stent was placed in patients with ductal leak. BFMS was removed when the WON cavity had collapsed completely. Patients were followed up at 3-month intervals. Results BFMS placement was successful in all 88 patients. A total of 64 patients (72.7 %) underwent necrosectomy (median 3 sessions). All BFMSs were removed at a median of 3.5 weeks (range 3 – 17 weeks). Ductal disconnection and leak occurred in 53/87 (60.9 %) and 61/87 (70.1 %) patients, respectively. A 5 Fr stent was placed in 56/61 patients (91.8 %) with ductal leak. Overall, 22 patients (25.0 %) had adverse events (17 mild, 1 moderate, 3 severe, 1 fatal). Recurrence was noted in 8/88 (9.1 %) at a median follow-up of 22 months. The recurrence rate was higher in patients with ductal disconnection than in those without (13.2 % vs. 2.9 %; P = 0.08), and was similar in patients with vs. without pancreatic duct stenting (7.1 % vs. 12.9 %; P = 0.44). Seven recurrences (87.5 %) partially regressed on follow-up and did not require therapy; in one case, drainage with a plastic stent was performed. Conclusions Short-term BFMS placement is an effective therapy for pancreatic WON. The majority of recurrences developed in patients with ductal disconnection and did not require therapy. Additional pancreatic duct stents probably do not influence the recurrence rate.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of fully covered self-expandable metal stents versus plastic stents in chronic pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Hoon Lee ◽  
Yeon Suk Kim ◽  
Eui Joo Kim ◽  
Hee Seung Lee ◽  
Jeong Youp Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Spontaneous Migration

AbstractChronic pancreatitis (CP) related main pancreatic duct (MPD) stricture has been a challenge for endoscopists. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FC-SEMS) has been tried in CP patients, but the efficacy and safety are still controversial. Thus, we aim to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of FC-SEMS vs. plastic stent placement in persistent MPD strictures secondary to CP. Between 2007 and 2018, 80 chronic pancreatitis patients (58 males, median age 49 years), who underwent endoscopic placement of FC-SEMS (n = 26) and plastic stent (n = 54) for persistent MPD strictures after at least 3 months of initial single plastic stenting, were retrospectively analyzed during a median follow-up duration of 33.7 months. As a result, MPD stricture resolution rate was statistically higher in FC-SEMS group (87.0% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.001). Although immediate complications occurred similarly (38.5% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.902), spontaneous migration (26.9%) and de novo strictures (23.1%) were pronounced delayed complications in FC-SEMS group. Pain relief during follow-up was significantly higher in FC-SEMS group (76.9% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.046). The total procedure cost was similar in both groups ($1,455.6 vs. $1,596.9, p = 0.486). In comparison with plastic stent, FC-SEMS placement for persistent MPD strictures had favorable long-term clinical efficacy, with its typical complications like spontaneous migration and de novo strictures.

A new 12-French plastic stent for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (06) ◽  
pp. 474-482
Author(s):  
Pierre H. Deprez ◽  
Tom G. Moreels ◽  
Tarik Aouattah ◽  
Hubert Piessevaux ◽  
Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Malignant Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Background Self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) are recommended in unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction. However, problems with dysfunction and migration of these stents are not negligible. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of a new 12-Fr plastic stent. Methods In an observational, prospective study, all consecutive patients who underwent biliary stenting with the 12-Fr stent were considered (index group). Referent groups were a historical cohort, matched by sex, etiology, and metastatic status, including patients with 10-Fr plastic stents and with fully covered and uncovered SEMSs (FCSEMSs and UCSEMSs). Outcomes were stent patency, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), technical success, 30-day mortality and adverse events. A post-procedure examination of removed stents was done. Results 72 patients (median age 66, range 32 – 94 years, 50 % men) were included (24 index, 48 referents). There were no differences in median stent patency time (P = 0.684). RBO was significantly lower with the 12-Fr compared with the 10-Fr profile stent (50 % vs. 81.3 %, P = 0.04), but no difference was found compared with the FCSEMSs (50 % vs. 43.8 %, P = 0.698). Technical success was 100 %, with no differences in 30-day mortality P = 0.105). The adverse events rate was 4.2 % for both groups (index n = 1, referents n = 2). Of 11 removed 12-Fr plastic stents suspected to be dysfunctional, 7 (64 %) were still patent. Conclusions This new 12-Fr plastic stent could be an effective and cheaper alternative to SEMSs in distal malignant biliary obstruction.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a new stent for EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage: long-term follow-up outcome

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (05) ◽  
pp. E505-E512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukitoshi Matsunami ◽  
Takao Itoi ◽  
Atsushi Sofuni ◽  
Takayoshi Tsuchiya ◽  
Kentaro Kamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Arterial Embolization ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stenting ◽  
Initial Intervention ◽  
Stent Exchange ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Drainage

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) has been reported as an alternative for failed conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, there are few dedicated devices for EUS-PD. Recently, we have developed a new plastic stent dedicated to EUS-PD and have conducted a feasibility study to evaluate its efficacy. In the current study, we evaluated the long-term efficacy of this new plastic stent. Patients and methods Thirty patients (61 ± 14.3 years old, 14 men) with acute recurrent pancreatitis caused by a stricture in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) or stenotic pancreatoenterostomy were treated at our institution using our recently developed 7Fr plastic stent between August 2013 and April 2017. Results The stent was placed successfully in all patients (30/30) and early clinical success was achieved in all of them. Early adverse events (AEs) occurred in seven patients (23.3 %), namely, self-limited abdominal pain (n = 5), mild pancreatitis (n = 1), and bleeding which required transcatheter arterial embolization (n = 1). Two patients died of primary disease and three were lost to follow-up. The remaining 25 patients were followed up after initial EUS-PD for a median of 23 months (range, 6 – 44 months). Twenty patients required regular stent exchange (3 times; range, 1 – 12 times). Spontaneous stent dislodgement was observed in six patients. Four patients wanted their stents removed 1 year after the initial intervention. Twelve patients (48 %) had regular stent exchange 1 year after the initial intervention. Three patients converted to standard transpapillary pancreatic duct stenting by conventional ERCP. Finally, nine patients (36 %) had complete stent removal either intentionally or by spontaneous dislodgement without any symptoms. Conclusion The new plastic stent for EUS-PD was associated with not only short-term technical success but also long-term clinical success in the majority of patients evaluated in this study.

scholarly journals Non-superiority of lumen-apposing metal stents over plastic stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis in a randomised trial

Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (7) ◽  
pp. 1200-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Young Bang ◽  
Udayakumar Navaneethan ◽  
Muhammad K Hasan ◽  
Bryce Sutton ◽  
Robert Hawes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Protocol Amendment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Procedure Duration ◽  
Walled Off Necrosis

ObjectiveAlthough lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are increasingly used for drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON), their advantage over plastic stents is unclear. We compared efficacy of LAMS and plastic stents for WON drainage.DesignPatients with WON were randomised to endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage using LAMS or plastic stents. Primary outcome was comparing total number of procedures to achieve treatment success defined as symptom relief in conjunction with WON resolution on CT at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were treatment success, procedure duration, clinical/stent-related adverse events, readmissions, length of hospital stay (LOS) and costs.Results60 patients underwent LAMS (n=31) or plastic stent (n=29) placement. There was no significant difference in total number of procedures performed (median 2 (range 2–7) LAMS vs 3 (range 2–7) plastic, p=0.192), treatment success, clinical adverse events, readmissions, LOS and overall treatment costs between cohorts. Although procedure duration was shorter (15 vs 40 min, p<0.001), stent-related adverse events (32.3% vs 6.9%, p=0.01) and procedure costs (US$12 155 vs US$6609, p<0.001) were higher with LAMS. Significant stent-related adverse events were observed ≥3 weeks postintervention in LAMS cohort. Interim audit resulted in protocol amendment where CT scan was obtained at 3 weeks postintervention followed by LAMS removal if WON had resolved. After protocol amendment, there was no significant difference in adverse events between cohorts.ConclusionExcept for procedure duration, there was no significant difference in treatment outcomes between LAMS and plastic stents. To minimise adverse events with LAMS, patients should undergo follow-up imaging and stent removal at 3 weeks if WON has resolved.Trial registration numberNCT02685865.

scholarly journals Fully covered self-expanding metal stents for refractory pancreatic duct strictures in symptomatic chronic pancreatitis, US experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (11) ◽  
pp. E1419-E1423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem Z. Sharaiha ◽  
Aleksey Novikov ◽  
Kristen Weaver ◽  
Pawan Marfatia ◽  
Jonathan M. Buscaglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Self Expanding Metal Stents

Abstract Background and study aims Fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) have been used to treat refractory pancreatic duct strictures. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of FCSEMS in chronic pancreatitis with refractory pancreatic duct strictures. Patients and methods This was a retrospective multicenter cases series of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with FCSEMS placement in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) at five tertiary care centers between February 2010 and June 2016. Primary endpoints were technical success, clinical success, and procedure-related morbidity. Secondary endpoints were pain relief at the end of follow-up and resolution of the pancreatic stricture on ERCP. Results Thirty-three patients with previously drained stents, 76 % of whom were male, underwent ERCP with FCSEMS placement. Mean duration of follow-up was 14 months. All of the patients had prior therapy. The technical success rate for FCSEMS placement was 100 % (n = 33) and the clinical success rate was 93 % (was n = 31). Stents were removed after a median duration of 14.4 weeks. After stent removal, the diameter of the narrowest MPD stricture had increased significantly from 1 mm to 4.5 mm (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant improvement on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from a median of 8.5 to 2.5. At the end of the study, (n = 27) 87.1 % of patients reported significant pain reduction with reduced narcotic use. Conclusion FCSEMS appeared to be a feasible, safe, and potentially effective Intervention in patients who had not responded to endoscopic therapy with plastic stents.

scholarly journals Lumen apposing metal stents are superior to plastic stents in pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a large international multicenter study

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. E347-E354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-I Chen ◽  
Juliana Yang ◽  
Shai Friedland ◽  
Ian Holmes ◽  
Ryan Law ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Transmural Drainage ◽  
International Multicenter Study ◽  
Walled Off Necrosis ◽  
International Multicenter

Abstract Background and study aims The use of lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) during EUS-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) has gained popularity. Data supporting their use in WON over plastic stents (PS), however, remain scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of LAMS (Axios, Boston Scientific) with PS in WON. Patients and methods This was a multicenter, retrospective study involving 14 centers. Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-TD of WON (2012 – 2016) were included. The primary end point was clinical success defined as WON size ≤ 3 cm within a 6-month period without need for percutaneous drainage (PCD) or surgery. Results A total of 189 patients (mean age 55.2 ± 15.6 years, 34.9 % female) were included (102 LAMS and 87 PS). Technical success rates were similar: 100 % in LAMS and 98.9 % in PS (P = 0.28). Clinical success was attained in 80.4 % of LAMS and 57.5 % of PS (P = 0.001). Rate of PCD was similar (13.7 % LAMS vs. 16.3 % PS, P = 0.62), while PS was associated with a greater need for surgery (16.1 % PS vs. 5.6 % LAMS, P = 0.02). Adverse events (AEs) were observed in 9.8 % of LAMS and 10.3 % of PS (P = 0.90) and were rated as severe in 2.0 % and 6.9 %, respectively (P = 0.93). After excluding patients with < 6 months follow-up, the rate of WON recurrence following initial clinical success was greater with PS (22.9 % PS vs. 5.6 % LAMS, P = 0.04). Conclusions When compared to PS, LAMS in WON is associated with higher clinical success, shorter procedure time, lower need for surgery, and lower rate of recurrence.

scholarly journals EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: a learning curve modified by technical progress

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. E92-E96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Tyberg ◽  
Kopal Jha ◽  
Shawn Shah ◽  
Prashant Kedia ◽  
Monica Gaidhane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
P Value ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Gallbladder Drainage ◽  
Post Procedure

Abstract Introduction Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is an efficacious and safe option for patients who cannot undergo cholecystectomy. It is a technically challenging procedure, requiring skills in EUS, and ERCP. The aim of this study was to define the learning curve for EUS-GBD. Patients and methods Consecutive patients undergoing EUS-GBD by a single operator were included from a prospective registry over 5 years. Demographics, procedure information, post-procedure follow-up data, and information on adverse events were collected. Non-linear regression and CUSUM analyses were conducted for the learning curve. Clinical success was defined as resolution of cholecystitis post-procedure. Results Forty-eight patients were included (58 % male, mean age 76 years). Twenty patients (42 %) had malignant cholecystitis. Most patients had lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) (15 mm, n = 29, 60 %; 10 mm, n = 8, 7 %). The remaining patients had FCSEMS (n = 9, 19 %) or plastic stents alone (n = 2, 4 %). Clinical success was achieved in 36 (86 %) of patients. Of the remaining 12, 7 were lost to follow-up and 5 had persistent cholecystitis. 9 patients (19 %) had adverse events including bleeding (n = 4), liver abscesses (n = 2), and hypotension. Two patients passed away post-procedure. Median procedure time was 41 minutes (range 16 – 121 min), with the 41-minute time occurring during the 19th procedure. Procedure durations further reduced, with the last 10 procedures being 20 minutes or under (nonlinear regression p value P < 0.0001). Conclusion Endoscopists experienced in EUS-GBD are expected to achieve a reduction in procedure time over successive cases, with efficiency reached at 41 minutes and a learning rate of 19 cases. Continued improvement is demonstrated with additional experience

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes of Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents Versus Plastic Stents in Chronic Pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Hoon Lee ◽  
Yeon Suk Kim ◽  
Eui Joo Kim ◽  
Hee Seung Lee ◽  
Jeong Youp Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Spontaneous Migration

Abstract Chronic pancreatitis (CP) related main pancreatic duct (MPD) stricture has been a challenge for endoscopists. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FC-SEMS) has been tried in CP patients, but the efficacy and safety are still controversial. Thus, we aim to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of FC-SEMS vs. plastic stent placement in persistent MPD strictures secondary to CP. Between 2007 and 2018, 80 chronic pancreatitis patients (58 males, median age 49 years), who underwent endoscopic placement of FC-SEMS (n=26) and plastic stent (n=54) for persistent MPD strictures, were retrospectively analyzed during a median follow-up duration of 33.7 months. As a result, MPD stricture resolution rate was statistically higher in FC-SEMS group (87.0% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.001). Although immediate complications occurred similarly (38.5% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.902), spontaneous migration (26.9%) and de novo strictures (23.1%) were pronounced delayed complications in FC-SEMS group. Pain relief during follow-up was significantly higher in FC-SEMS group (76.9% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.046). The total procedure cost was similar in both groups ($1,455.6 vs. $1,596.9, p = 0.486). In comparison with plastic stent, FC-SEMS placement for persistent MPD strictures had favorable long-term clinical efficacy, with its typical complications like spontaneous migration and de novo strictures.

scholarly journals Evaluation of post-ERCP pancreatitis after biliary stenting with self-expandable metal stents vs. plastic stents in benign and malignant obstructions

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (06) ◽  
pp. E888-E894
Author(s):  
Nichol S. Martinez ◽  
Sumant Inamdar ◽  
Sheila N. Firoozan ◽  
Stephanie Izard ◽  
Calvin Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Sems Group ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Stent Type ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stent

Abstract Background and study aims There are conflicting data regarding the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) with self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) compared to polyethylene stents (PS) in malignant biliary obstructions and limited data related to benign obstructions. Patients and methods A retrospective cohort study was performed of 1136 patients who underwent ERCP for biliary obstruction and received SEMS or PS at a tertiary-care medical center between January 2011 and October 2016. We evaluated the association between stent type (SEMS vs PS) and PEP in malignant and benign biliary obstructions. Results Among the 1136 patients included in our study, 399 had SEMS placed and 737 had PS placed. Patients with PS were more likely to have pancreatic duct cannulation, pancreatic duct stent placement, double guidewire technique, sphincterotomy and sphincteroplasty as compared to the SEMS group. On multivariate analysis, PEP rates were higher in the SEMS group (8.0 %) versus the PS group (4.8 %) (OR 2.27 [CI, 1.22, 4.24]) for all obstructions. For malignant obstructions, PEP rates were 7.8 % and 6.6 % for SEMS and plastic stents, respectively (OR 1.54 [CI, 0.72, 3.30]). For benign obstructions the PEP rate was higher in the SEMS group (8.8 %) compared to the PS group (4.2 %) (OR 3.67 [CI, 1.50, 8.97]). No significant differences between PEP severity were identified based on stent type when stratified based on benign and malignant. Conclusions PEP rates were higher when SEMS were used for benign obstruction as compared to PS. For malignant obstruction, no difference was identified in PEP rates with use of SEMS vs PS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document