The Microstructure of Dual Task Interaction. 3. Incompatibility and Attention Switching

Perception ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley Fisher

This report is the third in a series of reports concerned with close analysis of a dual task situation in which a five-choice serial task is combined with an auditory—verbal response task. A situation is described in which ‘incompatibility’ is incorporated into the five-choice task in order to increase the information processing load and thus explore the effect on the mechanism believed to control the microstructure of the time-sharing process. Results supported the notion that subjects were continuing to operate a sequential processing strategy in combining the two tasks. The structure of the interval generated by the occurrence of the auditory-verbal task was different in comparison with the compatible five-choice condition reported earlier, suggesting that the introduction of incompatibility causes a change in the characteristics of the time-sharing process. The structure of the interval remained organised and consistent, suggesting that the mechanism which controlled the time-sharing process was not disrupted by increased main task load and therefore was likely to involve a process which did not compete for attention space with task variables. Results also revealed an effect of the digit task response on the following two serial responses. It was suggested that these were probably best described as two independent effects: one arising from the sequential processing strategy adopted, and the other arising perhaps as a function of perception of overall task difficulty.

Perception ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley Fisher

As an extension of an experimental design reported previously the microstructure of dual task interaction was investigated in a condition in which task instructions favoured the task which had previously been designated the secondary task. In the situation explored in this paper subjects worked on the five-choice serial reaction task (designated secondary task) whilst at the same time they received single auditory digits at random time intervals, performed a transform operation (adding seven), and called the answer out into a voice key. The nature of the interaction was investigated using fine analysis of data, and it is argued that the results give further support to the view that subjects were processing information sequentially. A change in the patterning of serial responses in the interval defined by the digit stimulus ( Ds) and the digit response ( Dr) under the changed-instructions condition suggested that individuals are able to play an active role in the ordering of the attention process in sequential processing situations. ‘Process theory’, in which the information processing state of the main task is considered to have a direct influence on the response to the secondary task signal, is argued to be of little use in explaining the data. Two types of explanations based on criterion theory are considered—one which involves criterion setting with respect to a direct time base and one which relies on information processing stage, as an indirect time base. It is argued that the microstructure of dual task interaction should be investigated more closely and that the ordering of the time-sharing process is a skill.


Perception ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley Fisher

The experiment was designed to investigate attention-switching behaviour in sleep-deprived subjects and involved the same dual-task paradigm reported in earlier studies. The task specified by instructions to be the main task, was the five-choice serial-response task; the secondary task was an auditory-verbal digit task which occurred at random time intervals. Analysis of the intervals in which the two tasks concurred gave a different result. Sleep-deprived subjects seemed less able to control the fine structure of the interval and tended to persist in producing serial responses at the expense of the secondary-task response. The evidence supported the view that both sleep-deprived and control subjects were not able to process information in parallel and, thus, the difference in interval patterning was due to the difference in attention-switching processes. The possibility that sleep deprivation might result in loss of attentional control is considered briefly. A surprising result was that, in terms of overall response rates, the sleep-deprived group, although slower, preserved the dual-task priority structure better than the control group, who slowed on both tasks in the combined condition. The control result was different in this respect from control data from previous research, but it is important that within the sleep-deprived group there was evidence that ability to preserve the priority structure was unaffected.


Perception ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley Fisher

The patterning or microstructure of a situation where subjects were presented with two sets of information from two independent ‘high decision’ information processing tasks, was investigated. Thirty-two subjects worked at the five-choice serial-response task (designated by instructions to be the main task), whilst being presented with a transformation task which required that seven had to be added to a presented auditory digit (designated by instructions to be the secondary task). Results suggested that subjects were not able to process two streams of information in parallel, and that the way in which the attention process was ordered was partly a function of task instructions and partly a function of the random occurrence of each digit in relation to the on-going serial task. Results also gave support to the view that the locus of disruption was the production of the response to the secondary task. Explanations of this effect are considered.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hector Palada ◽  
Andrew Neal ◽  
David Strayer ◽  
Timothy Ballard ◽  
Andrew Heathcote

The Detection Response Task (DRT) is an international standard for assessing workload that has minimal effects on primary task performance, making it an attractive option for workload measurement in many settings. An increase in DRT response times and a decrease hit rates as primary task load increases is thought to occur due to competing resources being reallocated to the primary task. However, alternative processes could account for these effects, including changes in response caution, response bias and non-decision processes. We examine how people respond to changes in task demands in a dual-task environment and aim to identify what it is that the DRT is measuring. We model a primary classification task and the DRT in a time pressured environment using the linear ballistic accumulator (Brown & Heathcote, 2008) and a single-bound diffusion (Wald) model (Heathcote, 2004). Under greater time pressure, the rate of information processing increased on the primary task while response caution decreased. In contrast, the rate of information processing in the DRT declined with greater time pressure. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the DRT’s sensitivity to workload is due to the reallocation in resources as demands increase on the primary task.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hector Palada ◽  
Andrew Neal ◽  
David Strayer ◽  
Timothy Ballard ◽  
Andrew Heathcote

The Detection Response Task (DRT) is an international standard for assessing workload that has minimal effects on primary task performance, making it an attractive option for workload measurement in many settings. An increase in DRT response times and a decrease hit rates as primary task load increases is thought to occur due to competing resources being reallocated to the primary task. However, alternative processes could account for these effects, including changes in response caution, response bias and non-decision processes. We examine how people respond to changes in task demands in a dual-task environment and aim to identify what it is that the DRT is measuring. We model a primary classification task and the DRT in a time pressured environment using the linear ballistic accumulator (Brown & Heathcote, 2008) and a single-bound diffusion (Wald) model (Heathcote, 2004). Under greater time pressure, the rate of information processing increased on the primary task while response caution decreased. In contrast, the rate of information processing in the DRT declined with greater time pressure. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the DRT’s sensitivity to workload is due to the reallocation in resources as demands increase on the primary task.


1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Braune ◽  
Christopher D. Wickens

Performance in single task and dual task configurations was examined across four different age groups to determine the presence of an attention deficit hypothesis with increasing chronological age. Although a general slowing of performance could be shown no interaction between age and dual task loadings could be observed which is interpreted as negative evidence for the attention deficit hypothesis. A separate analysis revealed individual differences in time-sharing ability within age groups to be a significant factor in dual task performance.


1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 847-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yili Liu ◽  
Christopher D. Wickens

We report here the first experiment of a series studying the effect of task structure and difficulty demand on time-sharing performance and workload in both automated and corresponding manual systems. The experimental task involves manual control time-shared with spatial and verbal decisions tasks of two levels of difficulty and two modes of response (voice or manual). The results provide strong evidence that tasks and processes competing for common processing resources are time shared less effectively and have higher workload than tasks competing for separate resources. Subjective measures and the structure of multiple resources are used in conjunction to predict dual task performance. The evidence comes from both single task and from dual task performance.


Author(s):  
J. Bystricky ◽  
D. Calvet ◽  
J. Ernwein ◽  
O. Gachelin ◽  
T. Hansl-Kozanecka ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junchuan Zhou ◽  
Stefan Knedlik ◽  
Otmar Loffeld

The carrier-phase-derived delta pseudorange measurements are often used for velocity determination. However, it is a type of integrated measurements with errors strongly related to pseudorange errors at the start and end of the integration interval. Conventional methods circumvent these errors with approximations, which may lead to large velocity estimation errors in high-dynamic applications. In this paper, we employ the extra states to “remember” the pseudorange errors at the start point of the integration interval. Sequential processing is employed for reducing the processing load. Simulations are performed based on a field-collected UAV trajectory. Numerical results show that the correct handling of errors involved in the delta pseudorange measurements is critical for high-dynamic applications. Besides, sequential processing can update different types of measurements without degrading the system estimation accuracy, if certain conditions are met.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document