Student Evaluation of College Teaching Behaviors Instrument: A Factor Analysis

1973 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 596-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon E. Greenwood ◽  
Charles M. Bridges ◽  
William B. Ware ◽  
James E. McLean
1973 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon E. Greenwood ◽  
Charles M. Bridges ◽  
William B. Ware ◽  
James E. McLean

1974 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
GORDON E. GREENWOOD ◽  
CHARLES M. BRIDGES ◽  
WILLIAM B. WARE ◽  
JAMES E. MCLEAN

2004 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bob Algozzine ◽  
John Gretes ◽  
Claudia Flowers ◽  
Lisa Howley ◽  
John Beattie ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 369-375
Author(s):  
N. Jo Campbell ◽  
Harold L. Schoen

Students in 73 prealgebra classes completed a questionnaire containing items about their teacher's classroom behaviors, their grades in mathematics, and their attitudes toward mathematics, school, and their mathematics teacher. Several moderate relationships were found between the student's perception of specific teaching behaviors and student attitudes. A factor analysis of the students' perceptions of teacher behaviors revealed six factors in the teaching behavior portion of the inventory. A significant relationship (p<.05p<.05) between one of the inventory factors and the students' attitudes toward their mathematics teacher was identified.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Lee Waller

<p class="apa">This study examined the results of a student evaluation of faculty against the grades awarded and the level of the course for a higher education institution in the United Arab Emirates. The purpose of the study was to determine if the grades awarded in the course and/or level of the course impacted the evaluation scores awarded to the faculty member. The study utilized a 25-question student perception survey coupling course results with the overall course grade point average (GPA) and the course level. All courses were undergraduate. Descriptives for the responses were obtained prior to conducting a factor analysis for the purposes of dimension reduction. The analysis included 184 course pairings. The data set was examined to verify satisfaction of assumptions appropriate for factor analysis. Reliability analysis yielded a Chronbach’s alpha of 0.974. The factor analysis identified three underlying factors accounting for 80.07% of the variance. These three factors were identified as (1) overall perception of instruction, (2) the relationship of the grade and course level and (3) course management. Results of the study did not indicate that the grades given in a class nor the level of the course significantly affected the evaluations provided by the students. Grades and the level of the course were found to align. Student achievement in the course was also found to relate to the student’s perception of fair treatment by the faculty member.</p>


1984 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Peterson ◽  
G. Manny Gunne ◽  
Paul Miller ◽  
Orlando Rivera

1954 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Van Keuren ◽  
Benjamin Lease

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Busler ◽  
Claire Kirk ◽  
Jared Keeley ◽  
William Buskist

Across three phases, we investigated college students’ perceptions of poor college teaching to develop a typology of poor teaching behaviors. In Phase 1, students generated a list of qualities representative of poor teaching. In Phase 2, another group of students assigned behavioral correspondents to these qualities, resulting in a list of 15 poor teaching qualities and their attendant misbehaviors. Finally, in Phase 3, yet another group of students generated a “top 5” list of qualities and behaviors that their most ineffective teachers have exhibited. Across participants in Phase 3, the top 5 list included, in order, being disrespectful, offering unrepresentative and unfair student learning assessments, having unrealistic expectations for student learning, being less than knowledgeable on course content, and having poor communication skills. These findings provide practical guidance on which particular behaviors teachers should avoid adopting in their instructional repertoires.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document