scholarly journals General practitioners’ views on leadership roles and challenges in primary health care: a qualitative study

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Spehar ◽  
Hege Sjøvik ◽  
Knut Ivar Karevold ◽  
Elin Olaug Rosvold ◽  
Jan C. Frich
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Leadership Roles ◽  
Primary Health

scholarly journals General practitioners’ perspectives on care coordination in primary health care: A qualitative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ane Drougge Vassbotn ◽  
Hege Sjøvik ◽  
Trond Tjerbo ◽  
Jan Frich ◽  
Ivan Spehar
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
System Level ◽  
Financial Barriers ◽  
Financial Compensation ◽  
Primary Health

Introduction To explore Norwegian general practitioners’ experiences with care coordination in primary health care. Methods Qualitative study using data from five focus groups with 32 general practitioners in Norway. We analysed the data using systematic text condensation, a descriptive and explorative method for thematic cross-case analysis of qualitative data. Results The general practitioners had different notions of care pathways. They expressed a wish and an obligation to be involved in planning and coordination of primary health-care services, but they experienced organisational and financial barriers that limited their involvement and contribution. General practitioners reported lack of information about and few opportunities for involvement in formal coordination initiatives, and they missed informal arenas for dialogue with other primary health-care professionals. They argued that the general practitioner’s role as coordinator should be recognised by other parties and that they needed financial compensation for contributions and attendance in meetings with the municipality. Discussion General practitioners need informal arenas for dialogue with other primary health-care professionals and access to relevant information to promote coordinated care. There might be an untapped potential for improving patient care involving general practitioners more in planning and coordinating services at the system level. Financial compensation of general practitioners contribution may promote increased involvement by general practitioners.

scholarly journals General Practitioners’ Perspectives Over Solutions To Change BZD Prescription Trends – A Qualitative Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Reis ◽  
Helena Serra ◽  
Inês Faria ◽  
Miguel Xavier
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Health Care Settings ◽  
Prescription Practices ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Primary Health Care Settings

Abstract Background: This qualitative study explores General Practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives on solutions to address the problem of excessive prescription of benzodiazepines (BZDs). Over-prescription of BZDs at a primary health care settings is a prevalent issue in the region under analysis, but also elsewhere internationally. GPs are the gatekeepers to these medicines in primary care, but for several subjective, organizational and external reasons, they find it difficult to change current prescription patterns. Simultaneously, GPs recognize the issue of BZD excessive prescription practices, and propose possible solutions to invert the trend.Methods: Qualitative data were collected in seven primary health care centers in an interior and mostly rural region of Portugal. We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with GPs. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent thematic analysis. The themes were integrated and organized into eight axes for action.Results: Solutions proposed by GPs focused on organizational aspects, such as human resources, infrastructure and training (including on withdrawal schemes), alternative approaches, and wider community-based initiatives to counter societal aspects affecting mental health in the identified region. The themes were integrated and organized into eight axes for action.Conclusions: The findings provide an assessment of the priorities to change excessive BZDs prescription, as suggested by the GPs in primary health care settings, and hence reflecting what they consider to be context specific needs. Both experts and multi-stakeholders bottom-up perspectives should be taken into account when proposing new policies and local strategies to tackle current excessive BZD prescription, especially considering the failure of previous strategies to change this well-known public health issue. We consider that our results to be generalizable to all countries where primary health care plays a central role in care provision.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04925596

Dilemmas at a Primary Health Care Center: a baseline study for Computer-Supported Cooperative Health Care Work

1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 204-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Timpka ◽  
J. M. Nyce
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Group Process ◽  
Critical Incident ◽  
Care Work ◽  
Work Activity ◽  
Health Care Center ◽  
Health Care Work ◽  
Primary Health

Abstract:For the development of computer-supported cooperative health care work this study investigated, based upon activity theory, daily dilemmas encountered by the members of interprofessional primary health care work groups. The entire staff at four Swedish primary health care centers were surveyed, 199 personal interviews being conducted by the Critical Incident Technique. Medical dilemmas were mainly reported by general practitioners and nurses, organizational dilemmas by laboratory staff, nurses’ aides, and secretaries, and dilemmas in the patient-provider relation by nurses, nurses’ aides, and secretaries. Organizational and communication dilemmas reported by nurses, nurses’ aides, and secretaries often had their cause outside the control of the individual professional. These dilemmas were often “caused” by other group members (general practitioners or nurses), e.g., by not keeping appointment times or by not sharing information with patients. The implication for computer-supported cooperative health care work is that computer support should be planned on two levels. Collective work activity as a whole should benefit from individual clinical decision support for general practitioners and nurses. However, since most patient communication and organizational problems occurred at group level, group process support is required in these areas.

scholarly journals Partnership in Practice: a multidisciplinary approach to quality improvement in primary health care

1995 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 371-371
Author(s):  
Michael Phelan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Professional Groups ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Audit Team

This one day seminar was arranged by the King's Fund Organisational Audit team (KFOA), to take a multidisciplinary view of quality improvement in primary care. Despite the title of the day all the speakers were general practitioners and managers, and input from other professional groups was limited to questions and comments from the audience of nearly 200.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document