A Course Evaluation — A Proposal for an Integrated Approach to Courses

1988 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-159
Author(s):  
Ronald King
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. JMECD.S38104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean M. Bailey ◽  
Linda C. Perkowski

Introduction This article discussed curriculum development and implementation using a unique collaboration of basic scientists and clinicians functioning as course co-directors. It explores the pros, cons, and unintended consequences of this integrated approach through reflections of the faculty involved. Methods Ten faculty participated in semi-structured phone interviews to reflect on their experiences. Results Analysis of interview transcripts revealed four key themes: (1) the value of the basic scientist and clinician partnership, (2) strategies for coordination, (3) balancing responsibilities, and (4) hierarchy and power. Discussion This study identified that both basic scientists and clinicians experienced benefits from using a course co-director collaborative approach to curriculum development and implementation. While challenges are also noted, the benefits of the collaboration were evident in course organization, course evaluation reports, student feedback, and USMLE Step I pass rate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
Sheryl G Jordan ◽  
Elizabeth C Deans ◽  
Meredith Johnson ◽  
Sheila S Lee ◽  
Gary L Beck Dallaghan

Abstract In response to changing learner needs, our institution launched a new translational curriculum wherein basic sciences and clinical skills were integrated, longitudinal patient care experiences provided, and earlier opportunities in specialty fields introduced to better inform residency program decisions. Medical students taking the breast imaging elective were enrolled in a breast imaging immersive experience designed to meet the School of Medicine’s core competencies. In focusing the elective on a narrow range of specialized topics and skills, we labeled this experience the Breast Imaging Boot Camp. Outcome data from March 6, 2017, to April 26, 2019, have been analyzed for this report. The modifications made to the elective include: e-mailing a detailed orientation document to students prior to the start of the rotation; assigning students to diagnostic, procedural, and screening roles; the attendance of students at introductory radiology symposia; students’ weekly attendance at institutional multidisciplinary and divisional breast radiologic–pathologic correlation conferences; student self-study assignments using faculty-vetted resources; student participation in breast biopsy simulation and small parts ultrasound laboratories; the development of a student-centric radiology educational website; and student-directed publishing of digital case files. Medical student feedback and course analytics indicated superior course evaluation scores reinforced by narrative feedback. In website domain utilization data, the breast file domain is the most viewed subspecialty domain. The Breast Imaging Boot Camp is a successful curriculum. Its novelty lies in both its integrated approach to medical student core competencies and its clinician educators’ use of today’s student-favored teaching tools.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-186
Author(s):  
E COSENTINO ◽  
E RINALDI ◽  
D DEGLIESPOSTI ◽  
S BACCHELLI ◽  
D DESANCTIS ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Braun ◽  
Bernhard Leidner

This article contributes to the conceptual and empirical distinction between (the assessment of) appraisals of teaching behavior and (the assessment of) self-reported competence acquirement within academic course evaluation. The Bologna Process, the current higher-education reform in Europe, emphasizes education aimed toward vocationally oriented competences and demands the certification of acquired competences. Currently available evaluation questionnaires measure the students’ satisfaction with a lecturer’s behavior, whereas the “Evaluation in Higher Education: Self-Assessed Competences” (HEsaCom) measures the students’ personal benefit in terms of competences. In a sample of 1403 German students, we administered a scale of satisfaction with teaching behavior and the German version of the HEsaCom at the same time. Using confirmatory factor analysis, the estimated correlations between the various scales of self-rated competences and teaching behavior appraisals were moderate to strong, yet the constructs were shown to be empirically distinct. We conclude that the self-rated gains in competences are distinct from satisfaction with course and instructor. In line with the higher education reform, self-reported gains in competences are an important aspect of academic course evaluation, which should be taken into account in the future and might be able to restructure the view of “quality of higher education.” The English version of the HEsaCom is presented in the Appendix .


2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-338
Author(s):  
Robert T. Ammerman
Keyword(s):  

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement 14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine T. Chambers ◽  
Elizabeth A. Job
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document