The effects of yakson or gentle human touch training given to mothers with preterm babies on attachment levels and the responses of the baby: a randomized controlled trial

Author(s):  
Şeyda Can ◽  
Hatice Kaya
1999 ◽  
Vol 45 (4, Part 2 of 2) ◽  
pp. 199A-199A
Author(s):  
Ros O Garr ◽  
Stephen P Wardle ◽  
C William Yoxall ◽  
A Michael Weindling

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-487
Author(s):  
S. Sardar ◽  
S. Pal ◽  
R. Mishra

BACKGROUND: Transient tachypnea of the newborn(TTNB) is the most common respiratory morbidity in late preterm and term babies and is pathophysiologically related to delayed lung fluid clearance after birth. Mimicking low physiological fluid intake in the initial period of life may accelerate the recovery from TTNB. In a randomized controlled trial, we compared the roles of restricted versus standard fluid management in babies with TTNB requiring respiratory support. METHODS: This parallel group,non-blinded, stratified randomized controlled trial was conducted in a level III neonatal unit of eastern India. Late preterm and term babies with TTNB requiring continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were randomly allocated to standard and restricted fluid arms for the first 72 hours (hrs). Primary outcome was CPAP duration. RESULTS: In total, 100 babies were enrolled in this study with 50 babies in each arm. CPAP duration was significantly less in the restricted arm (48[42, 54] hrs vs 54[48,72] hrs, p = 0.002). However, no difference was observed in the incidence of CPAP failure between the two arms. In the subgroup analysis, the benefit of reduced CPAP duration persisted in late preterm but not in term infants. However, the effect was not significant in the late preterm babies exposed to antenatal steroid. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of restrictive fluid strategy in reducing CPAP duration in late preterm and term babies with TTNB. Late preterm babies, especially those not exposed to antenatal steroid were the most benefitted by this strategy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Rawal ◽  
Anirudh Ghai ◽  
Tarsem Jindal

Objective: To compare the analgesic effect of 25% dextrose and expressed breast milk (EBM) in pain relief during heel lance in late preterm babies using the premature infant pain profile (PIPP) score. Study Design: Prospective, double blind, randomized controlled trial. Setting: The neonatal intensive care unit of Jaipur Golden Hospital, Rohini, Delhi. Participants: One-hundred eleven late preterm babies who required heel lancing for glycemic control and who were on oral feeds and were hemodynamically stable. Methodology: The babies were randomized into 2 intervention groups (25% dextrose and EBM) and control group (sterile water). The test solution of 2mL was given to baby 2 minutes before heel lancing. The facial response to pain (brow bulge, eye squeeze, and nasolabial furrow) was analyzed from the video. Maximum heart rate (HR) and minimum blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) were also recorded at 30 seconds, 1 minute, 1.5 minutes, and 2.5 minutes after heel lancing by another camera. Outcome Variable: PIPP score, HR, SpO2 at 30 seconds, 1 minute, 1.5 minutes, and 2.5 minutes after heel lancing. Results: A total of 63 babies were considered for final analysis with 21 each in the 25% dextrose, EBM, and sterile water groups. The mean PIPP score in the 25% dextrose, EBM, and control groups at 30 seconds were 4.52, 6.86, and 10.14, respectively ( P < .001). At 1 minute, the PIPP scores were 3.24, 5.14, and 8.24, respectively, for the 25% dextrose, EBM, and control groups ( P < .001). Twenty-five percent dextrose gave better pain relief than EBM. Mean difference between the PIPP score in the 25% dextrose and EBM groups was –2.34 and –1.9 at 30 seconds and 1 minute, respectively, after the painful procedure ( P = .001). Babies in intervention groups had less increase in HR and less decrease in SpO2. Conclusions: Twenty-five percent dextrose and EBM significantly reduced procedural pain in neonates, though pain relief was better in the 25% dextrose group as compared to the EBM group.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane M. Alsweiler ◽  
Jane E. Harding ◽  
Frank H. Bloomfield

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document