Menopause: Developing a rational treatment plan

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 682-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Vitiello ◽  
Frederick Naftolin ◽  
Hugh S. Taylor
1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Cohen ◽  
John A. Persing

In this paper, we review the incidence of increased intracranial pressure in children with single-suture craniosynostosis. The major studies in this area are presented, along with their limitations. A rational treatment plan including multidisciplinary team management is recommended. All patients with proven synostosis should be followed closely, whether or not surgery is chosen. Continued clinical and basic science research are necessary to further clarify the ramifications of asymptomatic elevations of intracranial pressure in these patients.


2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trudy Granby

SummaryThe discipline of evidence-based prescribing is relatively new to nurses and other non-medical prescribers. The introduction of clinical governance, which emphasises accountability, quality and efficiency, means that it is no longer acceptable to base clinical decisions on personal opinion. Prescribing itself is just one stage in making a rational treatment decision, which requires a fully structured approach. This article will highlight some of the considerations that the prescriber has to take into account, including: the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of treatment options, how to check the evidence, the benefits or harms of a treatment and, the patient's own involvement in the treatment plan.


2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 292-292
Author(s):  
Danielle Vitiello ◽  
Frederick Naftoilin ◽  
Hugh S. Taylor

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 474-476
Author(s):  
V. B. Blank

For the rational treatment of diabetes, a daily quantitative study of the diabetic's urine for sugar content is necessary in order to be able to judge the effect of one or another diet and develop a treatment plan accordingly.


1987 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 720-722
Author(s):  
BJ Powell ◽  
BH Rice ◽  
LA Leonard
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 474-482
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Schneider

PurposeVocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) can be the result of iatrogenic or traumatic injury or may be idiopathic in nature. It can result in glottic incompetence leading to changes in vocal quality and ease. Associated voice complaints may include breathiness, roughness, diplophonia, reduced vocal intensity, feeling out of breath with talking, and vocal fatigue with voice use. A comprehensive interprofessional voice evaluation includes auditory-perceptual voice evaluation, laryngeal examination including videostroboscopy, acoustic and aerodynamic voice measures. These components provide valuable insight into laryngeal structure and function and individual voice use patterns and, in conjunction with stimulability testing, help identify candidacy for voice therapy and choice of therapeutic techniques.ConclusionA comprehensive, interprofessional evaluation of patients with VFMI is necessary to assess the role of voice therapy and develop a treatment plan. Although there is no efficacy data to support specific voice therapy techniques for treating VFMI, considerations for various techniques are provided.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
Frederick Fung

Abstract A diagnosis of toxic-related injury/illness requires a consideration of the illness related to the toxic exposure, including diagnosis, causation, and permanent impairment; these are best performed by a physician who is certified by a specialty board certified by the American Board of Preventive Medicine. The patient must have a history of symptoms consistent with the exposure and disease at issue. In order to diagnose the presence of a specific disease, the examiner must find subjective complaints that are consistent with the objective findings, and both the subjective complaints and objective findings must be consistent with the disease that is postulated. Exposure to a specific potentially causative agent at a defined concentration level must be documented and must be sufficient to induce a particular pathology in order to establish a diagnosis. Differential diagnoses must be entertained in order to rule out other potential causes, including psychological etiology. Furthermore, the identified exposure at the defined concentration level must be capable of causing the diagnosis being postulated before the examiner can conclude that there has been a cause-and-effect relationship between the exposure and the disease (dose-response relationship). The evaluator's opinion should make biological and epidemiological sense. The treatment plan and prognosis should be consistent with evidence-based medicine, and the rating of impairment must be based on objective findings in involved systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document