scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes and low-level residual HIV-RNA in adolescents perinatally infected with HIV-1 after switching to one-pill fixed-dose regimen

AIDS Care ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaella Rosso ◽  
Antonio Di Biagio ◽  
Franco Maggiolo ◽  
Loredana Nulvesu ◽  
Anna Paola Callegaro ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-470
Author(s):  
Andrea Antinori ◽  
Maria V. Cossu ◽  
Barbara Menzaghi ◽  
Gaetana Sterrantino ◽  
Nicola Squillace ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-387
Author(s):  
Andrea Antinori ◽  
Maria V. Cossu ◽  
Barbara Menzaghi ◽  
Gaetana Sterrantino ◽  
Nicola Squillace ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Leong ◽  
Leon Owusu ◽  
Jerrica Tang ◽  
Neeraj John ◽  
Kira E Voyer ◽  
...  

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an increasingly important aspect of patient care, as they offer a perspective from the patient themselves in the treatment and management of a particular disease state. They have a potential role in helping clinicians select an appropriate drug regimen in human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals, as well as those with HIV/hepatitis C (HCV) co-infection. They can also provide insight for individuals receiving long-acting (LA) injectable antiretroviral therapy (ART). Studies found from PROs that participants on an LA injectable ART regimen reported greater preference and treatment satisfaction compared with those on an oral ART regimen. Some additional studies have also used PROs to evaluate the switch to single-tablet regimens and compare different ART in treating HIV-1. Current PROs and how they can be improved for LA injectables were also discussed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Lisa L. Ross ◽  
Marjorie D. Robinson ◽  
Giampiero Carosi ◽  
Adriano Lazzarin ◽  
Hans-Juergen Stellbrink ◽  
...  

The impact of HIV-1 subtype on resistance mutation selection and on virologic response to fosamprenavir in combination with once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) dosing of ritonavir was examined in a prospective, open label, randomized study in antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-1 infected subjects. We studied APV109141 compared QD fosamprenavir/ritonavir (1400mg/100mg) to BID fosamprenavir/ritonavir (700mg/100mg), administered in combination with a QD fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine (600 mg/300 mg) combination tablet through 48 weeks in ART-naïve subjects. HIV genotypes were obtained from all subjects at screen. Subjects with virologic failure (VF) were also genotyped at baseline and VF. HIV subtypes observed in the ITT (n=214) population were A or AE or AG circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) 19%; B 62%; BF or BG CRFs 2%; C or CPX CRFs 7%; D 2%; F1 7%; G <1%. By TLOVR (ITT-exposed), 86/106 (81%) of subjects on QD study arm and 87/106 (82%) in the BID arm achieved plasma HIV-RNA<400 copies/mL at Week 48. Three subjects met VF criteria, 2 receiving QD fosamprenavir/ritonavir; 1 receiving BID fosamprenavir/ritonavir; (HIV subtype B, F1 A1, respectively). Baseline drug resistance was detected in 2/3 VFs: Subject 1-RT: K103K/N, T215C; major PI: V82A, L90M; and Subject 2-RT: M41L, L74V. Only virus from one subject with VF selected for any treatment-emergent mutation (Subject 1; M184V). Post-VF, Subject 3 (subtypeA1) suppressed HIV-RNA >400 copies/mL through 48 weeks. Subtype appeared to have no preferential impact on virologic response or selection for specific resistance mutations in subjects receiving fosamprenavir/ritonavir. Virologic failure rate was rare (3 subjects; each from different subtypes). At VF, virus from only one subject selected any HIV NRTI mutation (M184V); none selected major protease mutations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document