Community resilience to natural disasters in the informal settlements in Mwanza City, Tanzania

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. 1758-1788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Hambati ◽  
Genesis T. Yengoh
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (24) ◽  
pp. 10600
Author(s):  
Juan Du ◽  
Stefan Greiving

The Philippines is argued as the only Southeast Asian country where informal settlers’ communities have been self-organized and produced discernible impacts on the country’s urban policies. As one of the high risk countries, fifty percent of the country’s informal settlements are located in danger and disaster-prone areas. However, informal settlement upgrading has not reached its significance in disaster mitigation and community resilience building. At the national level, on-site upgrading is not established in disaster risk management or climate change adaptation strategies, which explains the lack of strategic approaches for local implementation. Metro Manila serves as a suitable backdrop in this sense to study informal settlement upgrading under the condition of high risk and rapid urbanization with a high civil society engagement. This study investigates the underlined reasons why upgrading strategically falls short in addressing disaster mitigation and community resilience building. Theoretically, it questions what on-site upgrading is about. Empirically, two hazard-prone informal settlement communities within Metro Manila are examined with their different risk profiles, community development needs and resilience priorities. The core issues of upgrading are, therefore, differentiated at the settlement level with communities’ innate socio-economic and eco-spatial features over time. Meanwhile, the paper heightens the necessity of tackling on-site upgrading at the settlement level and articulating settlements’ spatial correlations with the city development, so as to sustain upgrading outcomes. In addition, this study attempts at setting up a range of scenarios conditioned with COVID pandemic fallout. It endeavors to provide another facet of how to deal with adaptation and resilience. This includes the urgent strategy shift in the housing sector and its financial sustainability, innovative mechanisms to manage uncertainty and risks, lessons for post-COVID planning, etc.


2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 598-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Cutter ◽  
Lindsey Barnes ◽  
Melissa Berry ◽  
Christopher Burton ◽  
Elijah Evans ◽  
...  

ANALITIKA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Zarina Akbar ◽  
Iriani Indri Hapsari ◽  
Burhanuddin Tola

<p><em>This article presents the implementation of core principles and value of community resillience approach in Yogyakarta province. Model program is described in situations of community and conditions post disasters to suggest ways to foster community resilience. Community resilience encompasses individual preparedness as well as establishing a supportive social context in communities to withstand and recover from disasters. </em><em>Participants were drawn from the inhabitants of</em><em> C</em><em>angkringan districts Yogyakarta Province</em><em>. In this research also examine the challenges of integrating model of community resillience to stimulate more disaster awareness and importance of developing for evaluation this model in society. The goal is also to see under which conditions natural disasters can be considered windows of opportunity for sustainability community resilience in society. </em></p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 159
Author(s):  
Sri Suharyono ◽  
Nurmala K. Panjaitan ◽  
NFN Saharuddin

<p>Volcanic eruption victims to be relocated deal with two sequential shaking conditions, namely when a volcano erupts and when the community is relocated. This paper reviews the literatures on social relations and community resilience to the natural disasters, especially volcanoes, as well as how the relocation policy is implemented for farmer community victims. The ability of the community to rise from adversity due to natural disasters and to deal with challenges of a new life in the relocation area is determined by  existing resources and their adaptive capacity. The more various the resources and the stronger the adaptive the community, the community will be more resilient. Social relations will further accelerate community resilience. Relocation is expected to improve the community’s life, but in fact in several places it raises new problems. Some considerations are needed for relocation such as location, natural and social environment, and social ties in the community. It is essential to design an efficient, effective policy to deal with natural disasters which includes sustainable livelihood and social systems.</p><p> </p><p>Abstrak</p><p>Komunitas korban erupsi gunung berapi yang direlokasi dihadapkan pada dua kondisi goncangan yang berurutan, yakni pada saat terjadinya erupsi dan saat komunitas tersebut direlokasi. Tulisan ini mengulas sejumlah literatur yang terkait dengan relasi sosial, resiliensi komunitas terhadap bencana alam yang mereka hadapi, khususnya gunung berapi. Ulasan juga mencakup bagaimana kebijakan relokasi yang diterapkan bagi komunitas petani korban bencana alam. Kemampuan komunitas untuk bangkit dari keterpurukan akibat bencana alam dan untuk menghadapi tantangan kehidupan yang baru di kawasan relokasi ditentukan oleh kekuatan sumber daya dan kapasitas adaptif yang dimiliki oleh komunitas. Semakin bervariasi sumber daya dan semakin kuat kapasitas adaptif yang dimiliki oleh komunitas maka menentukan sejauh mana resiliensi komunitas itu berlangsung. Relasi sosial dalam bentuknya yang asosiatif semakin mempercepat terjadinya resiliensi komunitas. Relokasi yang diharapkan mampu memperbaiki kehidupan komunitas dengan menjauhkannya dari ancaman bencana yang akan datang, justru di beberapa tempat menimbulkan persoalan. Diperlukan pertimbangan dalam pelaksanaan relokasi seperti lokasi, lingkungan alam dan sosial, dan juga ikatan sosial dalam komunitas. Perlu dirumuskan kebijakan yang efektif dan efisien untuk penanggulangan dampak bencana alam yang meliputi sistem penghidupan dan sistem sosial secara berkelanjutan.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 17001
Author(s):  
Brent A McKnight ◽  
Martina K. Linnenluecke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document