CD26, together with cell surface adenosine deaminase, is selectively expressed on ALK-positive, but not on ALK-negative, anaplastic large cell lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2181-2188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junichi Kameoka ◽  
Ryo Ichinohasama ◽  
Hiroko Inoue ◽  
Joji Yamamoto ◽  
Hisayuki Yokoyama ◽  
...  
Pathology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-374
Author(s):  
Zaid Househ ◽  
Kyaw Lynnhtun ◽  
Peter Presgrave ◽  
Alistair Lochhead

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2764-2769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Khuda Dad Khan ◽  
Thomas Lin ◽  
...  

Purpose MDX-060 is a human anti-CD30 immunoglobulin (Ig) G1κ monoclonal antibody that inhibits growth of CD30-expressing tumor cells in preclinical models. To determine the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and efficacy of MDX-060 in patients with relapsed or refractory CD30+ lymphomas, sequential phase I and II studies were performed. Patients and Methods In the phase I portion, MDX-060 was administered intravenously at doses of 0.1, 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks to cohorts of three to six patients. Twenty-one patients—16 with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), three with anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL), and two with CD30+ T-cell lymphoma—were enrolled. Because of the lack of a defined MTD or dose-response correlation, the phase II portion was amended to include several dose levels. In the phase II portion, an additional 51 patients, 47 with HL and four with ALCL, were treated at doses of 1, 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg. Results MDX-060 was well tolerated, and an MTD has not been identified. Only 7% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events. Among the 72 patients treated, clinical responses were observed in six. Twenty-five patients had stable disease, including five who remained free from progression 1 year after treatment. Conclusion MDX-060 was well tolerated at doses up to 15 mg/kg. MDX-060 has limited activity as a single agent, but the minimal toxicity observed and the significant proportion of patients with stable disease suggests that further study of MDX-060 in combination with other therapies is warranted.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seema Rana ◽  
Rajiv Tangri

Middle aged female presented with generalised lymphadenopathy and fever for last one month. Peripheral blood findings were within normal limits. There was no extra nodal involvement. FNAC performed initially from a cervical node suggested possibility of Hodgkin’s lymphoma and a whole node biopsy was performed. Histopathogical examination revealed effaced nodal architecture and a polymorphous population of lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils and scattered large mononuclear cells with prominent nucleolus. An initial panel of CD3, CD20, LCA, CD15, CD30 and PAX5 was performed. The large atypical cells were positive for LCA, CD3 and CD30 with variable positivity for CD15. CD 30 showed Golgi and membranous staining. These large atypical cells were negative for PAX5 and CD20. In view of above findings, Hodgkin’s lymphoma was ruled out and a possibility of Non- Hodgkin’s lymphoma was considered. Further IHC markers were performed which included CD2, CD5, CD7, EMA, Alk, CD10 and KI67. CD5 showed variable positivity. The cells of interest were negative for CD2, CD7, ALK and EMA. Ki 67 index was 70-80%. Overall histological and IHC findings favoured Alk negative Anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Differential diagnosis considered was peripheral T cell lymphoma (NOS). Hodgkin’s lymphoma, peripheral T cell lymphoma (NOS) and anaplastic large cell lymphoma share common histomorphological findings. With careful analysis of Immunohistochemistry, it is easier to categorise Hodgkin’s lymphoma. ALK negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma and peripheral T cell lymphoma (NOS) are difficult to categorise and show overlapping features. We in this case have discussed clinical, histomorphological and IHC pattern of Alk negative Anaplastic large cell lymphoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document