The role of virtual reality intervention on young adult smokers' motivation to quit smoking: a feasibility and pilot study

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 217-226
Author(s):  
Pasquale Caponnetto ◽  
Marilena Maglia ◽  
Daniele Lombardo ◽  
Shirin Demma ◽  
Riccarco Polosa
Author(s):  
Andrea C Johnson ◽  
Monique M Turner ◽  
Samuel J Simmens ◽  
W Douglas Evans ◽  
Andrew A Strasser ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Young adults are vulnerable to cigarette package marketing. Pictorial warning labels are recommended for tobacco control. Research should address questions raised in legal challenges including causal mechanisms. Evidence is mixed and understudied among young adults (e.g., discrete emotions and risk perceptions). Purpose This study investigated mediators of pictorial warning label effects on motivation to quit smoking among young adult smokers. Methods This study analyzed data from a randomized trial with a 4 week exposure to a cigarette pictorial warning among young adult smokers (N = 229) aged 18–30 with assessments at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 months. Mediation analyses used latent change scores to test the effects post-intervention on fear, anger, and risk perceptions. We also examined whether post-intervention measures predicted change in motivation to quit smoking at 3 months. The first model assessed aggregate risk perceptions and the second model assessed discrete risk perceptions (deliberative, affective). Results Pictorial warning label exposure led to increases in fear which led to increased motivation to quit smoking for the first (B = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.04, 0.26) and second (B = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.25) model. Exposure modestly increased motivation to quit by way of fear and affective risk perceptions (B = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.00, 0.04). Exposure had a direct relationship on increased motivation to quit as well. Conclusions Findings demonstrate factors contributing to change in motivation to quit smoking among young adult smokers after pictorial warning label exposure. Affective processes are mediators of pictorial warning label effects.


2018 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damaris J. Rohsenow ◽  
Jennifer W. Tidey ◽  
Rosemarie A. Martin ◽  
Suzanne M. Colby ◽  
Thomas Eissenberg

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 206-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab Bishry ◽  
Mohamed Fekry ◽  
Heba El Shahawy ◽  
Marwa Soltan ◽  
Amany Haroun ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Belinda Borrelli ◽  
Romano Endrighi ◽  
Lisa M Quintiliani ◽  
Rosemary B Hughes ◽  
Sherry Pagoto

Abstract People with mobility impairments (MIs; use assistive devices to ambulate) have twice the smoking prevalence versus the general population. A Facebook intervention could improve reach to smokers with MIs, but use and patterns of use are unknown. The study examined: (a) Facebook use and relationship with Facebook-based social support and (b) whether Facebook use differs by motivation to quit smoking. Participants (N = 510; 56.3% female, mean age = 42.4 years) were recruited via a recruitment company to complete a one-time online survey assessing motivation to quit within 30 days, Facebook use (Facebook Activities Scale), reasons for use (Facebook Motives Scale), attitudes (Facebook Intensity Scale), and social support (Facebook Measure of Social Support). The vast majority said that Facebook is part of their daily routine (92.9%), 83% checked Facebook >once a day, and 69% spent >30 min/day on Facebook. Facebook was used to connect with similar others (68.4%), participate in groups (72.9%), decrease loneliness (69.2%), and obtain health information (62.5%); 88% said that they would join a Facebook program to help them quit smoking. A greater number of Facebook friends (rs = .18–.22, p < .001) and greater Facebook use (rs = .20 to rs = .59; p < .001) were correlated with greater perceived social and emotional support. Those motivated to quit posted more frequently (odds ratio [OR] = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10, 2.22) and were more likely to indicate that they would join a Facebook group for smoking cessation (OR = 4.15, 95% CI = 2.05, 8.38) than those not motivated. Facebook could circumvent disability and environmental barriers to accessing cessation among this health disparity population.


Author(s):  
Karishma Kaur Gill ◽  
Sander van der Moolen ◽  
Sobia Bilal

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 716-727
Author(s):  
Yusuf Yusuf ◽  
Nur Indriani Agus ◽  
Muhammad Syafar

Adolescent smoking behavior is a behavior that endangers health, but there are still many teenagers who become smokers who started when they were teenagers or at the age of 11 years, especially teenage boys who often did this action. The use of appropriate media can affect the knowledge of respondents. In general, this study aims to determine the effect of social media intervention (whatsapp) with flyers on changes in adolescent smoking behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tomado Village, Lindu District, Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi. And specifically, the research objective was to determine the effect of social media intervention (whatsapp) with flyers on smoking knowledge, smoking frequency, changes in smoking attitudes, and adolescent motivation to quit smoking. This type of research is a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest two group design. The research sample used purposive sampling method and obtained a sample of 40 people. The instrument of this research used questionnaires, observation sheets, pretest and posttest questionnaires, and media flyers. Analysis of research data using a comparative test, namely Paired sample t-test, and Independent t-test. The results showed that there was a significant difference in respondents' knowledge about the dangers of smoking in the intervention group, while in the control group it was found that there was no significant difference in respondents' knowledge; there was a significant difference in the frequency of adolescent smoking in the intervention group and the control group; there is a significant difference in adolescent smoking attitudes in the intervention group and the control group; there was a significant difference in motivation to quit smoking in the intervention group and the control group.


2010 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill S. Halterman ◽  
Belinda Borrelli ◽  
Kelly M. Conn ◽  
Paul Tremblay ◽  
Susan Blaakman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document