Normative performance of older individuals on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) according to ethno-racial group, gender, age and education level

Author(s):  
Joanne Ryan ◽  
Robyn L. Woods ◽  
Anne M. Murray ◽  
Raj C. Shah ◽  
Carlene J. Britt ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Kuslansky ◽  
M. Katz ◽  
J. Verghese ◽  
C. B. Hall ◽  
P. Lapuerta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1018-1018
Author(s):  
Arzuyan A ◽  
Mathew A ◽  
Rosenblatt A ◽  
Gracian E ◽  
Osmon D

Abstract Objective The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised (HVLT-R) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) are memory tests with embedded measures of performance validity (Recognition Discrimination [RD] and Discrimination Index [DI], respectively). We evaluated whether cognitive ability and age influenced embedded measures of effort. Methods Participants included 30 young adults (YA) and 29 older adults (dichotomized into unimpaired [OAu] and impaired [OAi]). Participants completed a medication management ability assessment (MMAA), daily memory lapses survey (DM), digit span, and the Transverse Patterning (TP) and Reversal Learning (RL) computerized tests. Two Repeated-Measures MANOVAs were conducted to determine if Passing PVT and Age/Cognitive Ability influenced performance. An ROC analysis was conducted for HVLT-RD and BVMT-DI to determine pass/fail, and false positives/negatives on embedded measures. Results Those in the YA group who failed RDS (YA-fail), performed better than OAi-fail and OAi-pass groups on RT Errors (p < .0001). On TP Errors, the YA group differed from all four OA groups (p < .0001). On MMAA a significant difference was observed between OAi-fail and all other groups (p < .001). On RD, YA groups differed from both OAi groups (p = .0008). On DI, the YA groups differed from the OAi-fail group (p = .002). A logistic regression classified 43/57 participants successfully into the three cognitive groups using the six predictors (χ2 = 55.73, p < .0001, R2 = .468). RT Errors and TP were significant (Likelihood χ2 = 7.25, p = .027). Conclusion HVLT-RD failed to detect validity for OAi, as did BVMT-DI for YA and OAu. Instead, impairment effects are seen on HVLT-RD and BVMT-DI where YA groups differed from some combination of both/one of the OA groups.


1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Shapiro ◽  
R. H. B. Benedict ◽  
D. Schretlen ◽  
J. Brandt

2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Hogervorst ◽  
Marc Combrinck ◽  
Pablo Lapuerta ◽  
Judith Rue ◽  
Kate Swales ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve S. Chung ◽  
Susan Kerls ◽  
Ann Hammer ◽  
Robert Kustra

Older individuals may be more susceptible to cognitive side effects of antiepileptic drugs than are younger adults. This randomized, double-blind study compared the cognitive effects of lamotrigine (median maintenance dosage, 500.0 mg/d) and topiramate (median maintenance dosage, 300.0 mg/d) as adjunctive therapy for 16 weeks in patients ≥50 years of age. Fifty-one patients (lamotrigine, n=25; topiramate, n=26) were enrolled, and 28 patients (lamotrigine, n=15; topiramate, n=13) completed the study. In a combined analysis of all cognitive tests performed, no significant differences between treatment groups were noted. However, analyses of individual cognitive test results revealed that lamotrigine-treated patients had significantly better results on the Controlled Oral Word Association Test and the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test, whereas topiramate-treated patients had significantly more favorable results on the Digit Cancellation Test and the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test. Larger studies are needed to further clarify the differences in the cognitive effects of lamotrigine and topiramate in older patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document