Interactions among Emergent Relations during Equivalence Class Formation

1992 ◽  
Vol 45 (2b) ◽  
pp. 125-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanny Fields ◽  
Barbara J. Adams ◽  
Sandra Newman ◽  
Thom Verhave

The interactions among symmetry, transitivity, and equivalence tests during the formation of 3-member equivalence classes were studied with 14 college students. After training AB and BC, a test with BA, CB, AC, and CA was conducted concurrently. Failure led to serial testing with probes for CA equivalence, BA symmetry, CA equivalence, CB symmetry, CA equivalence, AC transitivity, and CA equivalence. For five subjects, equivalence tests were passed immediately once BA and CB symmetry as well as AC transitivity had been induced. Thus, symmetry and transitivity were precursors for successful performance on equivalence tests. The conjoint function of symmetry and transitivity was assessed with the equivalence probes. As the equivalence probes were passed immediately, the presence of symmetry alone and transitivity alone were sufficient for their conjoint function without additional intervention. For different subjects, transitivity alone and symmetry were induced either directly with BA, CB, or AC probes or indirectly with equivalence probes. Equivalence probes can also induce various combinations of symmetry and transitivity. Thus, different subjects formed classes in various patterns at different rates.

Author(s):  
Felix Högnason ◽  
Erik Arntzen

AbstractIn an attempt to limit the opportunity to engage in mediating behavior, two groups of adult participants received preliminary training in identity matching with limited hold levels (LH) for responding of 0.7 s for the sample and 1.2 s for the comparisons. The two groups were subsequently trained to form three 5-member classes, using the same LH levels, where the A, B, D, and E stimuli were abstract stimuli, and the C stimuli were meaningful pictures. In two tests for emergent relations, the LH for Group Short was unchanged, whereas 5 s were added to the LH for the comparisons for Group Long. None of the participants in Group Short responded in accordance with stimulus equivalence in either of the two tests. In Group Long, one participant responded in accordance with stimulus equivalence in the first test, and an additional eight participants formed equivalence classes in the second test.


1997 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn M. Buffington ◽  
Lanny Fields ◽  
Barbara J. Adams

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Pilgrim ◽  
Rebecca Click ◽  
Mark Galizio

Developmental differences in children’s conditional discrimination learning, equivalenceclass formation, and equivalence-class disruption were investigated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, children between 2 and 9 years of age demonstrated age-related differences across a series of preliminary training steps, such that time to acquisition was more variable for younger than for older children on an initial identity matching and category matching task. However, uponcompletion of the preliminary training, there were no age-related differences in time to acquisition of the two arbitrary conditional discriminations that would serve as the basis for equivalence-class formation, nor were there differences in time to demonstrate stable equivalence classes (Experiment 2). Also in Experiment 2, children between 2 and 14 years of age were exposed to a potential challenge to the demonstrated equivalence classes; the reinforcement contingency for theAC conditional discrimination was reversed (i.e., given A1, A2 or A3, reinforcers were produced by selecting C2, C3, or C1 respectively). While there was little change in performance on reflexivity or BA symmetry tests following the challenge, age-related differences were obtained for CA symmetry and combined tests for equivalence. The older children were more likely to demonstrate an orderly change in equivalence-class membership consistent with the reversal training, while the younger children showed either little change or substantial disruption in their equivalence patterns. These data are considered in relation to more traditional investigations of children’s category formation, as well as their implications for the study of equivalence-class formation and flexibility.


2015 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Perez ◽  
Gerson Y. Tomanari ◽  
Manish Vaidya

1998 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Anne Rehfeldt ◽  
Linda J. Hayes

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 575-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanny Fields ◽  
Robert Travis ◽  
Deborah Roy ◽  
Eytan Yadlovker ◽  
Liliane de Aguiar-Rocha ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document