The human female orgasm: critical evaluations of proposed psychological sequelae

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Prause
1995 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1601-1615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Thornhill ◽  
Steven W. Gangestad ◽  
Randall Comer

2013 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan P. Zietsch ◽  
Pekka Santtila

2006 ◽  
pp. 255-275
Author(s):  
Randy Thornhill ◽  
Steve W. Gangestad ◽  
Randall Comer

2006 ◽  
pp. 255-275
Author(s):  
Randy Thornhill ◽  
Steven W. Gangestad ◽  
Randall Comer

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1545-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Ellsworth ◽  
Drew H. Bailey
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 620-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Pound ◽  
Martin Daly

Human males are more polygamously inclined than females. However, there is substantial within-sex variation in polygamous inclinations and practices. This is acknowledged by Gangestad & Simpson but we pose the question: Is the target article's “strategic pluralism” pluralistic enough? In addition, we argue that the hypothesis that the female orgasm is an adaptation for post-copulatory female choice between rival ejaculates demands more research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document