Saving coral reefs – and applied marine biology in Marine Biology Research

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Fenchel ◽  
Franz Uiblein
2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Fenchel ◽  
Franz Uiblein

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana I. Neto ◽  
Afonso C. L. Prestes ◽  
José M. N. Azevedo ◽  
Roberto Resendes ◽  
Nuno Álvaro ◽  
...  

The oldest reference to marine life in Formigas Islets (oriental group of the Azores archipelago) goes back to the 16th century. Nevertheless, their macroalgal flora is poorly known, the published information mainly resulting from occasional collections of sporadic visitors. To overcome this and contribute to the knowledge of Azorean macroalgal flora at both local and regional scales, a thorough investigation was conducted in 1990 and 1991 under two expeditions promoted by the Marine Biology Research Group of the Department of Biology, University of the Azores. Collections and presence data recordings were undertaken at the littoral and sublittoral levels down to approximately 40 m, in an area of approximately 0.04 km2. This paper lists the taxonomic records and provides information regarding each species’ ecology and occurrence on the Islets’ littoral. A total of 320 specimens are registered (including taxa identified only at generic level) belonging to 90 taxa of macroalgae, from which 70 were diagnosed at species level. The confirmed species comprise 39 Rhodophyta, 12 Chlorophyta and 19 Ochrophyta (Phaeophyceae), distributed in 22 orders (13 Rhodophyta, 3 Chlorophyta and 6 Ochrophyta) and 37 families (24 Rhodophyta, 6 Chlorophyta and 7 Ochrophyta). Sixty-one species represent new records for the Islets, from which Botryocladia macaronesica Afonso-Carrillo, Sobrino, Tittley & Neto and Laurencia viridis Gil-Rodriguez & Haroun are Macaronesian endemisms. Most species are native to the Azores, but six have an uncertain origin and four are introduced (the Rhodophyta Asparagopsis armata Harvey; Laurencia dendroidea J.Agardh; Neoizziella divaricata (C.K.Tseng) S.-M.Lin, S.-Y.Yang & Huisman and the Ochrophyta Hydroclathrus tilesii (Endlicher) Santiañez & M.J.Wynne).


Nature ◽  
1953 ◽  
Vol 171 (4358) ◽  
pp. 828-829
Author(s):  
N. B. EALES

The opportunity to study the coral reefs of the Solomon Islands was valuable for two reasons. First, the Melanesian region has been remarkably neglected by reef workers. To the south-west, the Great Barrier Reef Expedition of 1928-9 provided a basis for understanding Australian reefs; the Snellius Expedition explored those of Indonesia; the Japanese and more recently the Americans have studied the high islands of Micronesia, especially Guam and Saipan; and much recent work has been carried out on the atolls of the Carolines and Marshalls. Within Melanesia itself, the Gatala Aquarium in Noumea and the Singer-Polignac Expedition have begun work on the New Caledonian reefs; the Noona Dan Expedition visited the Bismarck Archipelago and Rennell Island; and some prewar studies were made in Fiji and the New Hebrides. Almost no work at all had been done in the Solomon Islands before 1965, with one notable exception.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna Bushnell ◽  
Soo Park

Climate change is greatly harming coral reefs (Gibbs and West, 2019). It is important to research how to help these coral reefs build resilience against climate change but research programs are severely underfunded (Johnston et al. 2020). This paper explored how lack of funding prevents scientists from saving coral reefs and how scientists themselves can be affected. The goal of this paper was to bring to light the struggles faced in the midst of underfunding to feasibly gain support from politicians and government officials to promote funding for these programs. Through three virtual interviews with two scientists and one college professor, I gathered personal experiences from these participants on how coral reefs are being affected today, why research is necessary, and how lack of funding prevents the restoration of these reefs. With the use of a thematic analysis, I was able to recognize common themes between the interviews in order to conclude how lack of program funding prevents scientists from managing and restoring these coral reef ecosystems. The initial assumption for this paper was that coral reef research is underfunded because coral reefs are considered less important, however, the analysis of the data for this paper concluded that all research programs are underfunded. In essence, marine biology, in general, is underfunded as opposed to mainly research on coral reefs. As a result, scientists can be very limited in their abilities to conduct research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document